Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: iio: adc: rtq6056: add support for the whole RTQ6056 family

[ChiYuan Huang <cy_huang@richtek.com>]

On Tue, Dec 26, 2023 at 10:18:47AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 26/12/2023 04:47, cy_huang@richtek.com wrote:
> > From: ChiYuan Huang <cy_huang@richtek.com>
> > 
> > Add compatible support for RTQ6053 and RTQ6059.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: ChiYuan Huang <cy_huang@richtek.com>
> > ---
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/richtek,rtq6056.yaml         | 5 ++++-
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/richtek,rtq6056.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/richtek,rtq6056.yaml
> > index 88e008629ea8..d1e1f36d1972 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/richtek,rtq6056.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/richtek,rtq6056.yaml
> > @@ -25,7 +25,10 @@ description: |
> >  
> >  properties:
> >    compatible:
> > -    const: richtek,rtq6056
> > +    enum:
> > +      - richtek,rtq6053
> > +      - richtek,rtq6056
> 
> Aren't these devices compatible? Your driver change says they are, so
> express compatibility with list here (and oneOf).
>
Thanks, I try to take other binding as the reference. One more question.
If rtq6053 is compatible with rtq6056, there's only chip package type difference.
Do I need to seperate it into a dedicated enum element?
Or just put it into one item and said this part number is compatible with rtq6056? 
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>