Re: [PATCH 3/3] btrfs: migrate to the newer memparse_safe() helper

[David Disseldorp <ddiss@suse.de>]

On Sat, 23 Dec 2023 20:28:07 +1030, Qu Wenruo wrote:

> The new helper has better error report and correct overflow detection,
> furthermore the old @retptr behavior is also kept, thus there should be
> no behavior change.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
> ---
>  fs/btrfs/ioctl.c |  8 ++++++--
>  fs/btrfs/super.c |  8 ++++++++
>  fs/btrfs/sysfs.c | 14 +++++++++++---
>  3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
> index 4e50b62db2a8..8bfd4b4ccf02 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
> @@ -1175,8 +1175,12 @@ static noinline int btrfs_ioctl_resize(struct file *file,
>  			mod = 1;
>  			sizestr++;
>  		}
> -		new_size = memparse(sizestr, &retptr);
> -		if (*retptr != '\0' || new_size == 0) {
> +
> +		ret = memparse_safe(sizestr, MEMPARSE_SUFFIXES_DEFAULT,
> +				    &new_size, &retptr);
> +		if (ret < 0)
> +			goto out_finish;
> +		if (*retptr != '\0') {

Was dropping the -EINVAL return for new_size=0 intentional?

>  			ret = -EINVAL;
>  			goto out_finish;
>  		}
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/super.c b/fs/btrfs/super.c
> index 3a677b808f0f..2bb6ea525e89 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/super.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/super.c
> @@ -400,6 +400,14 @@ static int btrfs_parse_param(struct fs_context *fc, struct fs_parameter *param)
>  		ctx->thread_pool_size = result.uint_32;
>  		break;
>  	case Opt_max_inline:
> +		int ret;
> +
> +		ret = memparse_safe(param->string, MEMPARSE_SUFFIXES_DEFAULT,
> +				    &ctx->max_inline, NULL);
> +		if (ret < 0) {
> +			btrfs_err(NULL, "invalid string \"%s\"", param->string);
> +			return ret;
> +		}
>  		ctx->max_inline = memparse(param->string, NULL);

Looks like you overlooked removal of the old memparse() call above.

Cheers, David