From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev
Subject: [frederic-dynticks:timers/core 10/11] kernel/cpu.c:1404:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'tick_assert_timekeeping_handover'
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2023 19:31:07 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202312271944.Un7vt3Si-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/frederic/linux-dynticks.git timers/core
head: 018d96d27486694a8496e3937ac2f7270442c7c3
commit: a8b61acc0092102926a2a5d8aa6c162d9d5762a3 [10/11] tick: Assume timekeeping is correctly handed over upon last offline idle call
config: parisc-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231227/202312271944.Un7vt3Si-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: hppa-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231227/202312271944.Un7vt3Si-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202312271944.Un7vt3Si-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from include/linux/sched/isolation.h:6,
from kernel/cpu.c:13:
include/linux/tick.h: In function 'tick_cpu_dying':
include/linux/tick.h:29:1: warning: no return statement in function returning non-void [-Wreturn-type]
29 | static inline int tick_cpu_dying(unsigned int cpu) { }
| ^~~~~~
kernel/cpu.c: In function 'cpuhp_report_idle_dead':
>> kernel/cpu.c:1404:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'tick_assert_timekeeping_handover' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
1404 | tick_assert_timekeeping_handover();
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
vim +/tick_assert_timekeeping_handover +1404 kernel/cpu.c
1398
1399 void cpuhp_report_idle_dead(void)
1400 {
1401 struct cpuhp_cpu_state *st = this_cpu_ptr(&cpuhp_state);
1402
1403 BUG_ON(st->state != CPUHP_AP_OFFLINE);
> 1404 tick_assert_timekeeping_handover();
1405 rcutree_report_cpu_dead();
1406 st->state = CPUHP_AP_IDLE_DEAD;
1407 /*
1408 * We cannot call complete after rcutree_report_cpu_dead() so we delegate it
1409 * to an online cpu.
1410 */
1411 smp_call_function_single(cpumask_first(cpu_online_mask),
1412 cpuhp_complete_idle_dead, st, 0);
1413 }
1414
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
reply other threads:[~2023-12-27 11:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202312271944.Un7vt3Si-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.