From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pl1-f174.google.com (mail-pl1-f174.google.com [209.85.214.174]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FF1123A5 for ; Sat, 30 Dec 2023 06:43:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="k/jH+cWD" Received: by mail-pl1-f174.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1d426ad4433so25921685ad.0 for ; Fri, 29 Dec 2023 22:43:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1703918629; x=1704523429; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=PKyJkvWfyB9gFWvqVcyA6eRgjBZI+oSvrJAT3OSS80Q=; b=k/jH+cWDcLRMC6rkNR1gYj/6uKyrKhiL4+N3E2Yd8euxYvbypzsaA2Ak11jMTICbEQ fzoY+PvoxLORIh5ivKNjas3fA6j1eoESWRSSn3Jntgdb5a8/4O9bqJ/qrD7W0MiXUXTw taB+Vsju6en+Va+5mDiY27+iJYQ5lfHbXytzkImGT1NNiQT3Gy6fjG2cu1Ny6UlCkx/O yWQ6PT1SLHgJCHC7evE5o0GRfPIct5v6A9J0nCgNxuJNY+lS+4QHYQd9x2GN88wkjrHH 22Ufp8UB8ElYjooyS6zOJGLSvkeVQEnA7LWNIGjmbFjfHZI/5ZC5OfxTiQXVchgnO3qk M82Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1703918629; x=1704523429; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=PKyJkvWfyB9gFWvqVcyA6eRgjBZI+oSvrJAT3OSS80Q=; b=mvlf3Y+8gTIlbYS6WbS5fIJ6MhGcqaMbjFNqfoQKC+zrRnAJE9qdDsvnJuRPnh80nS Jlqlwsrfg6Leg+40ma6havsOjIQLueHTy9y78gkhJn4CH5DgsP1Pc2IldkJPjEPesFe/ oMvbsY2LMI4HuLzWPKp7Gz4bsVz5+tAEsHAUlrcSwWTkappLR5NBhNi681llp7BPgzQE ffu7zKQ9aqi3d3oqqKr+pBWXBGswcIZlAAJEl/jpJ1ADS3I0Vq1/owXphxlEOuY3eqYI /nqxSmEKNgkTNIaZhB06kkLjrNmKf4NOWxTfpfsE3/xjWbWwioxrpsTyvr63eYTu73WK BNNA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwUsXt/IY1fZqP0udIO4YZCdaJx+0/7isa5ETXSpK3Sn4O8zHqB EXfjzfz6dAzfFlzYYMRVLABYs1Wx97s= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IG9P5OdTD5zmd05vyT5nBAgd0Wy4wpkoZrlmBy2Gcv7rbFnNojYD9C50d3DHq5OkFhm+Z3h7Q== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:4b11:b0:28c:b0d5:e021 with SMTP id lx17-20020a17090b4b1100b0028cb0d5e021mr710256pjb.49.1703918629098; Fri, 29 Dec 2023 22:43:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from rigel (60-241-235-125.tpgi.com.au. [60.241.235.125]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d14-20020a17090ad98e00b0028ac1112124sm17115735pjv.30.2023.12.29.22.43.47 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 29 Dec 2023 22:43:48 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2023 14:43:45 +0800 From: Kent Gibson To: Seamus de Mora Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [libgpiod] help with GPIOSET_INTERACTIVE Message-ID: <20231230064345.GA54180@rigel> References: <20231229155837.GA103278@rigel> <20231230022136.GA19799@rigel> <20231230050325.GA40096@rigel> <20231230055330.GA47174@rigel> <20231230062933.GA52702@rigel> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On Sat, Dec 30, 2023 at 12:36:37AM -0600, Seamus de Mora wrote: > On Sat, Dec 30, 2023 at 12:29 AM Kent Gibson wrote: > > > > On Sat, Dec 30, 2023 at 12:25:17AM -0600, Seamus de Mora wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 29, 2023 at 11:53 PM Kent Gibson wrote: > > > > > > > > And today after my email you undownvoted it, confirming that you did in > > > > fact downvote it. > > > > > > > > > > I don't want to argue about this. What I did was restored my upvote. > > > Which I probably shouldn't have done b/c you left your snide remark in > > > your answer. Anyway - I don't know what to do about it... does a > > > 2-point downvote mean that much to you? > > > > Oh, so it's snide now, is it. Unburying that hatchet? > > > > Anyway, I couldn't care less - it was your actions that I found > > informative. > > :) Kent, you're wearing me out, man. > Lightweight! ;-) > But NO - NOT un-burying the hatchet, not un-downvoting what I didn't > downvote in the first place. I clicked a button three times: first was > to up-vote, next was to take the upvote away, 3rd was to restore the > upvote. That is my total recollection - honest. In which case trying to upvote it again now would do nothing. I'll bet you that isn't the case. Cheers, Kent.