From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Subject: Re: Compilation errors in drivers/event/opdl/
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2018 09:44:46 +0100
Message-ID: <20236883.VkVyGBRfOF@xps>
References: <D6881123.1A3A3D%Harish.Patil@cavium.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, ferruh.yigit@intel.com
To: "Patil, Harish" <Harish.Patil@cavium.com>,
 "liang.j.ma@intel.com" <liang.j.ma@intel.com>,
 "peter.mccarthy@intel.com" <peter.mccarthy@intel.com>,
 jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com
 [66.111.4.25]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0654F1B1B8
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Sat, 20 Jan 2018 09:45:23 +0100 (CET)
In-Reply-To: <D6881123.1A3A3D%Harish.Patil@cavium.com>
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

20/01/2018 06:18, Patil, Harish:
> Hi,
>=20
> I am seeing below compilation errors in drivers/event/opdl/, this is with
> cloned latest DPDK (git clone http://dpdk.org/git/dpdk).
>=20
> ..
> ..
> /home2/hpatil/e4/jan19-inbox-submit/dpdk/drivers/event/opdl/opdl_evdev_xs=
ta
> ts.c: In function =E2=80=98opdl_xstats_get_names=E2=80=99:
> /home2/hpatil/e4/jan19-inbox-submit/dpdk/drivers/event/opdl/opdl_evdev_xs=
ta
> ts.c:89:2: error: =E2=80=98for=E2=80=99 loop initial declarations are onl=
y allowed in
> C99 mode
>   for (uint32_t j =3D 0; j < max_num_port_xstat; j++) {
>   ^

My compiler does not raise this error.
What is your compiler?

Anyone to fix it QUICKLY please? today?

Harish, do you think we should revert if not fixed?