From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Chris von Recklinghausen <crecklin@redhat.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, crecklin@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] don't record leak information on allocations done between kmemleak_init and kmemleak_late_init
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2024 18:51:33 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202401031842.TmCnuTu2-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240102153428.139984-1-crecklin@redhat.com>
Hi Chris,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on v6.7-rc8]
[also build test ERROR on linus/master]
[cannot apply to akpm-mm/mm-everything next-20240103]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Chris-von-Recklinghausen/don-t-record-leak-information-on-allocations-done-between-kmemleak_init-and-kmemleak_late_init/20240102-233553
base: v6.7-rc8
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240102153428.139984-1-crecklin%40redhat.com
patch subject: [PATCH] don't record leak information on allocations done between kmemleak_init and kmemleak_late_init
config: arc-randconfig-001-20240103 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240103/202401031842.TmCnuTu2-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: arceb-elf-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240103/202401031842.TmCnuTu2-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202401031842.TmCnuTu2-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
mm/kmemleak.c: In function 'kmemleak_not_leak':
>> mm/kmemleak.c:1194:33: error: 'kmamleak_late_initialized' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'kmemleak_late_initialized'?
1194 | if (kmemleak_enabled && kmamleak_late_initialized && ptr &&
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| kmemleak_late_initialized
mm/kmemleak.c:1194:33: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
mm/kmemleak.c: In function 'kmemleak_ignore':
mm/kmemleak.c:1213:33: error: 'kmamleak_late_initialized' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'kmemleak_late_initialized'?
1213 | if (kmemleak_enabled && kmamleak_late_initialized && ptr &&
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| kmemleak_late_initialized
vim +1194 mm/kmemleak.c
1182
1183 /**
1184 * kmemleak_not_leak - mark an allocated object as false positive
1185 * @ptr: pointer to beginning of the object
1186 *
1187 * Calling this function on an object will cause the memory block to no longer
1188 * be reported as leak and always be scanned.
1189 */
1190 void __ref kmemleak_not_leak(const void *ptr)
1191 {
1192 pr_debug("%s(0x%px)\n", __func__, ptr);
1193
> 1194 if (kmemleak_enabled && kmamleak_late_initialized && ptr &&
1195 !IS_ERR(ptr))
1196 make_gray_object((unsigned long)ptr);
1197 }
1198 EXPORT_SYMBOL(kmemleak_not_leak);
1199
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-03 10:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-02 15:34 [PATCH] don't record leak information on allocations done between kmemleak_init and kmemleak_late_init Chris von Recklinghausen
2024-01-02 20:07 ` Catalin Marinas
[not found] ` <5d979584-a168-4594-af19-93af6bc0ae5a@redhat.com>
2024-01-03 12:25 ` Catalin Marinas
2024-01-03 3:08 ` kernel test robot
2024-01-03 10:51 ` kernel test robot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202401031842.TmCnuTu2-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=crecklin@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.