From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: "Jonas Dreßler" <verdre@v0yd.nl>
Cc: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>,
Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@gmail.com>,
Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@gmail.com>,
linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Bluetooth: hci_sync: Check the correct flag before starting a scan
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2024 17:41:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240104174112.GJ31813@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240102180810.54515-1-verdre@v0yd.nl>
On Tue, Jan 02, 2024 at 07:08:08PM +0100, Jonas Dreßler wrote:
> There's a very confusing mistake in the code starting a HCI inquiry: We're
> calling hci_dev_test_flag() to test for HCI_INQUIRY, but hci_dev_test_flag()
> checks hdev->dev_flags instead of hdev->flags. HCI_INQUIRY is a bit that's
> set on hdev->flags, not on hdev->dev_flags though.
>
> HCI_INQUIRY equals the integer 7, and in hdev->dev_flags, 7 means
> HCI_BONDABLE, so we were actually checking for HCI_BONDABLE here.
>
> The mistake is only present in the synchronous code for starting an inquiry,
> not in the async one. Also devices are typically bondable while doing an
> inquiry, so that might be the reason why nobody noticed it so far.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonas Dreßler <verdre@v0yd.nl>
FWIIW, I agree with this analysis and the proposed fix looks
correct to me.
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
I do wonder if it is appropriate to treat this as a bug fix -
is there a use-visible problem? If so, the following seems appropriate to
me.
Fixes: abfeea476c68 ("Bluetooth: hci_sync: Convert MGMT_OP_START_DISCOVERY")
...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-04 17:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-02 18:08 [PATCH] Bluetooth: hci_sync: Check the correct flag before starting a scan Jonas Dreßler
2024-01-02 18:35 ` bluez.test.bot
2024-01-04 17:41 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2024-01-04 22:20 ` [PATCH] " patchwork-bot+bluetooth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240104174112.GJ31813@kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=johan.hedberg@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luiz.dentz@gmail.com \
--cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=verdre@v0yd.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.