From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B8C4C3DA6E for ; Fri, 5 Jan 2024 13:17:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1838F83EC6; Fri, 5 Jan 2024 13:17:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org 1838F83EC6 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eoyntirFd0li; Fri, 5 Jan 2024 13:17:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ash.osuosl.org (ash.osuosl.org [140.211.166.34]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6423883EAB; Fri, 5 Jan 2024 13:17:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org 6423883EAB Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [140.211.166.133]) by ash.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E4491BF841 for ; Fri, 5 Jan 2024 13:17:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1538C436D6 for ; Fri, 5 Jan 2024 13:17:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org 1538C436D6 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp2.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5GSVrpEuzeD2 for ; Fri, 5 Jan 2024 13:17:31 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: delayed 349 seconds by postgrey-1.37 at util1.osuosl.org; Fri, 05 Jan 2024 13:17:31 UTC DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp2.osuosl.org 81534436BD Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [195.135.223.130]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81534436BD for ; Fri, 5 Jan 2024 13:17:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org [IPv6:2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF64421D34; Fri, 5 Jan 2024 13:11:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DE05136F5; Fri, 5 Jan 2024 13:11:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([10.150.64.162]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id GC9eAgkAmGVEDQAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Fri, 05 Jan 2024 13:11:37 +0000 Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2024 14:11:35 +0100 From: Petr Vorel To: Rob Landley Message-ID: <20240105131135.GA1484621@pevik> References: <20240103015240.1065284-1-pvorel@suse.cz> <20240103114957.GD1073466@pevik> <5a1f1ff3-8a61-67cf-59a9-ce498738d912@landley.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5a1f1ff3-8a61-67cf-59a9-ce498738d912@landley.net> X-Spamd-Bar: / X-Rspamd-Server: rspamd2.dmz-prg2.suse.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.82 / 50.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.30)[pvorel@suse.cz]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; SPAMHAUS_XBL(0.00)[2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97:from]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[suse.cz:+]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; BAYES_HAM(-0.11)[66.47%]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; URIBL_BLOCKED(0.00)[suse.cz:dkim]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; RCPT_COUNT_TWELVE(0.00)[18]; FUZZY_BLOCKED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: BF64421D34 X-Mailman-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1704460298; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=XMu0Tc8M/OGHMVCqGwKKidHMYVyujs8ULbIrYAKyctk=; b=PirfMTLkdWyOzUVVz7p6G2ULi4VhsbiBiEovaWdYP6RmzcuwhtQKKUgKa98M3/Ip8l1k/g XwNng9X+TvSLeuIRIA9U9KlvSfKkHLqoBB1MvKK/dh3zwPOw6svOjDiCk3dtV0Bq+qEnr5 Qv06406TfLtT/5tFFYvfvqWg9SA8IqM= X-Mailman-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1704460298; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=XMu0Tc8M/OGHMVCqGwKKidHMYVyujs8ULbIrYAKyctk=; b=/vZmO3d4O+ZOvy2AL7ekQ7g4Fa0ZowPCpSXsCf1l01Jz1p9pxtSiDqKiaPh+6bDpvquCQ9 f3qkaTRGWtQT5+AQ== X-Mailman-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1704460297; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=XMu0Tc8M/OGHMVCqGwKKidHMYVyujs8ULbIrYAKyctk=; b=Uk26/hGBJXjpw8WTegFn/8dWqIzARLH7T6rfeEUvsOk1mAl5RjTrjREnCSUF82cXmbTFX9 ts3XwW8FLL2JAyFOtJWm3lU0iLZC81SdDShl3VZRNMWb0BNeZNSJ3HWfhQaPBCcvuyZzgl B8qt1ml182j0+u5k2jGWDzmk7ft6S0o= X-Mailman-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1704460297; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=XMu0Tc8M/OGHMVCqGwKKidHMYVyujs8ULbIrYAKyctk=; b=Dq2NWLSjfkY6KPsXaTn2B4MnPvlbKABhwyuoEx9zmsCM6PoEOnXj0wNXu+xI3t+rB1SZi2 oehXWwFEzy/kGqDg== X-Mailman-Original-Authentication-Results: smtp2.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=suse.cz header.i=@suse.cz header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=PirfMTLk; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.i=@suse.cz header.a=ed25519-sha256 header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=/vZmO3d4; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=suse.cz header.i=@suse.cz header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=Uk26/hGB; dkim=neutral header.d=suse.cz header.i=@suse.cz header.a=ed25519-sha256 header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=Dq2NWLSj X-Mailman-Original-Authentication-Results: smtp-out1.suse.de; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_rsa header.b="Uk26/hGB"; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=Dq2NWLSj Subject: [Buildroot] Call for nommu LTP maintainer [was: Re: [PATCH 00/36] Remove UCLINUX from LTP] X-BeenThere: buildroot@buildroot.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion and development of buildroot List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Petr Vorel Cc: Andrea Cervesato , Jonathan Corbet , Linux-sh list , Christophe Lyon , Randy Dunlap , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Li Wang , linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, Geert Uytterhoeven , Linux ARM , Cyril Hrubis , John Paul Adrian Glaubitz , linux-riscv , buildroot@buildroot.org, Greg Ungerer , ltp@lists.linux.it, automated-testing@lists.yoctoproject.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: buildroot-bounces@buildroot.org Sender: "buildroot" Hi all, [ Cc also automated-testing and buildroot ML FYI thread started here: https://lore.kernel.org/ltp/20240103015240.1065284-1-pvorel@suse.cz/ ] > On 1/3/24 06:09, Cyril Hrubis wrote: > > Hi! > >> I am not sure I agree with this series. > >> Removing support for UCLINUX from LTP is almost a guarantee for > >> not noticing when more breakage is introduced. > >> How exactly is UCLINUX broken in LTP? > > As far as we know noone is using it and nobody is maintaing it for a > > decade, > Nobody is maintaining "uclinux" because that was a distro, but you can build > nommu support in buildroot and such, and people do. Right, there are nommu users. Will anybody join LTP development to maintain nommu support in LTP? The needed work is to add this support to LTP new C API [1] and use it in the relevant test. There is some implementation in the old API, I have no idea how well it worked. If nobody stands for maintaing nommu, we will have to delete it. There is nobody from the current maintainers who is using LTP on nommu HW (that is the reason why nommu support have not been implemented in the new API). Kind regards, Petr > Rob [1] https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/wiki/C-Test-API _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list buildroot@buildroot.org https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [195.135.223.130]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ECFA32CCB4 for ; Fri, 5 Jan 2024 13:11:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.cz Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.cz Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=suse.cz header.i=@suse.cz header.b="PirfMTLk"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=suse.cz header.i=@suse.cz header.b="/vZmO3d4"; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=suse.cz header.i=@suse.cz header.b="Uk26/hGB"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=suse.cz header.i=@suse.cz header.b="Dq2NWLSj" Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org [IPv6:2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF64421D34; Fri, 5 Jan 2024 13:11:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1704460298; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=XMu0Tc8M/OGHMVCqGwKKidHMYVyujs8ULbIrYAKyctk=; b=PirfMTLkdWyOzUVVz7p6G2ULi4VhsbiBiEovaWdYP6RmzcuwhtQKKUgKa98M3/Ip8l1k/g XwNng9X+TvSLeuIRIA9U9KlvSfKkHLqoBB1MvKK/dh3zwPOw6svOjDiCk3dtV0Bq+qEnr5 Qv06406TfLtT/5tFFYvfvqWg9SA8IqM= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1704460298; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=XMu0Tc8M/OGHMVCqGwKKidHMYVyujs8ULbIrYAKyctk=; b=/vZmO3d4O+ZOvy2AL7ekQ7g4Fa0ZowPCpSXsCf1l01Jz1p9pxtSiDqKiaPh+6bDpvquCQ9 f3qkaTRGWtQT5+AQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1704460297; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=XMu0Tc8M/OGHMVCqGwKKidHMYVyujs8ULbIrYAKyctk=; b=Uk26/hGBJXjpw8WTegFn/8dWqIzARLH7T6rfeEUvsOk1mAl5RjTrjREnCSUF82cXmbTFX9 ts3XwW8FLL2JAyFOtJWm3lU0iLZC81SdDShl3VZRNMWb0BNeZNSJ3HWfhQaPBCcvuyZzgl B8qt1ml182j0+u5k2jGWDzmk7ft6S0o= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1704460297; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=XMu0Tc8M/OGHMVCqGwKKidHMYVyujs8ULbIrYAKyctk=; b=Dq2NWLSjfkY6KPsXaTn2B4MnPvlbKABhwyuoEx9zmsCM6PoEOnXj0wNXu+xI3t+rB1SZi2 oehXWwFEzy/kGqDg== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DE05136F5; Fri, 5 Jan 2024 13:11:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([10.150.64.162]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id GC9eAgkAmGVEDQAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Fri, 05 Jan 2024 13:11:37 +0000 Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2024 14:11:35 +0100 From: Petr Vorel To: Rob Landley Cc: Cyril Hrubis , Geert Uytterhoeven , ltp@lists.linux.it, Li Wang , Andrea Cervesato , Greg Ungerer , Jonathan Corbet , Randy Dunlap , John Paul Adrian Glaubitz , Christophe Lyon , linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linux ARM , linux-riscv , Linux-sh list , automated-testing@lists.yoctoproject.org, buildroot@buildroot.org Subject: Call for nommu LTP maintainer [was: Re: [PATCH 00/36] Remove UCLINUX from LTP] Message-ID: <20240105131135.GA1484621@pevik> Reply-To: Petr Vorel References: <20240103015240.1065284-1-pvorel@suse.cz> <20240103114957.GD1073466@pevik> <5a1f1ff3-8a61-67cf-59a9-ce498738d912@landley.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5a1f1ff3-8a61-67cf-59a9-ce498738d912@landley.net> X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Level: X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: smtp-out1.suse.de; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_rsa header.b="Uk26/hGB"; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=Dq2NWLSj X-Rspamd-Server: rspamd2.dmz-prg2.suse.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.82 / 50.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.30)[pvorel@suse.cz]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; SPAMHAUS_XBL(0.00)[2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97:from]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[suse.cz:+]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; BAYES_HAM(-0.11)[66.47%]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; URIBL_BLOCKED(0.00)[suse.cz:dkim]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; RCPT_COUNT_TWELVE(0.00)[18]; FUZZY_BLOCKED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-Spam-Score: -0.82 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: BF64421D34 X-Spam-Flag: NO Hi all, [ Cc also automated-testing and buildroot ML FYI thread started here: https://lore.kernel.org/ltp/20240103015240.1065284-1-pvorel@suse.cz/ ] > On 1/3/24 06:09, Cyril Hrubis wrote: > > Hi! > >> I am not sure I agree with this series. > >> Removing support for UCLINUX from LTP is almost a guarantee for > >> not noticing when more breakage is introduced. > >> How exactly is UCLINUX broken in LTP? > > As far as we know noone is using it and nobody is maintaing it for a > > decade, > Nobody is maintaining "uclinux" because that was a distro, but you can build > nommu support in buildroot and such, and people do. Right, there are nommu users. Will anybody join LTP development to maintain nommu support in LTP? The needed work is to add this support to LTP new C API [1] and use it in the relevant test. There is some implementation in the old API, I have no idea how well it worked. If nobody stands for maintaing nommu, we will have to delete it. There is nobody from the current maintainers who is using LTP on nommu HW (that is the reason why nommu support have not been implemented in the new API). Kind regards, Petr > Rob [1] https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/wiki/C-Test-API From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6222C46CD2 for ; Fri, 5 Jan 2024 13:12:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Reply-To:List-Subscribe:List-Help: List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=cyb9nWkqwc7cM3RCIlJn/t8Rh3Qw+F3TR3CFWPn92yk=; b=i1oyjywOfqagns ASSns2y7SV2MeeHcW3mBmlTmsMTVJE2e92YZ8AMAVJaw8IKw6uKY6tiodR+LzAt/0Gt89rAdJtgPF hGOckIw7mTFwlRVVH/97ahkwMfU7i7uEHmFBhbPxWCKGqSV1P2NyPYcdxvJwH9mN1rWWga7SCPwIm oTRUaxzlkUNfBP7hsUR2kdQGH6cEpMaEQYs27/LJGIOPK2QRlxhaUIq+tFfLgP/3VPX2qtaoPPwjI 5qITc0Aaz/IIQrc9rFsbe8UJkghnRiN81JPid7+ZCx8PfqV/HBKewcLm+joG7pFHwPXVeDLfR0Aek s9scJb3/FHxbynzr7KeA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rLjzH-00Gvwt-1a; Fri, 05 Jan 2024 13:11:47 +0000 Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b251:101:10:150:64:1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rLjzB-00Gvsx-2x; Fri, 05 Jan 2024 13:11:44 +0000 Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org [IPv6:2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF64421D34; Fri, 5 Jan 2024 13:11:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1704460298; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=XMu0Tc8M/OGHMVCqGwKKidHMYVyujs8ULbIrYAKyctk=; b=PirfMTLkdWyOzUVVz7p6G2ULi4VhsbiBiEovaWdYP6RmzcuwhtQKKUgKa98M3/Ip8l1k/g XwNng9X+TvSLeuIRIA9U9KlvSfKkHLqoBB1MvKK/dh3zwPOw6svOjDiCk3dtV0Bq+qEnr5 Qv06406TfLtT/5tFFYvfvqWg9SA8IqM= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1704460298; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=XMu0Tc8M/OGHMVCqGwKKidHMYVyujs8ULbIrYAKyctk=; b=/vZmO3d4O+ZOvy2AL7ekQ7g4Fa0ZowPCpSXsCf1l01Jz1p9pxtSiDqKiaPh+6bDpvquCQ9 f3qkaTRGWtQT5+AQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1704460297; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=XMu0Tc8M/OGHMVCqGwKKidHMYVyujs8ULbIrYAKyctk=; b=Uk26/hGBJXjpw8WTegFn/8dWqIzARLH7T6rfeEUvsOk1mAl5RjTrjREnCSUF82cXmbTFX9 ts3XwW8FLL2JAyFOtJWm3lU0iLZC81SdDShl3VZRNMWb0BNeZNSJ3HWfhQaPBCcvuyZzgl B8qt1ml182j0+u5k2jGWDzmk7ft6S0o= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1704460297; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=XMu0Tc8M/OGHMVCqGwKKidHMYVyujs8ULbIrYAKyctk=; b=Dq2NWLSjfkY6KPsXaTn2B4MnPvlbKABhwyuoEx9zmsCM6PoEOnXj0wNXu+xI3t+rB1SZi2 oehXWwFEzy/kGqDg== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DE05136F5; Fri, 5 Jan 2024 13:11:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([10.150.64.162]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id GC9eAgkAmGVEDQAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Fri, 05 Jan 2024 13:11:37 +0000 Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2024 14:11:35 +0100 From: Petr Vorel To: Rob Landley Cc: Cyril Hrubis , Geert Uytterhoeven , ltp@lists.linux.it, Li Wang , Andrea Cervesato , Greg Ungerer , Jonathan Corbet , Randy Dunlap , John Paul Adrian Glaubitz , Christophe Lyon , linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linux ARM , linux-riscv , Linux-sh list , automated-testing@lists.yoctoproject.org, buildroot@buildroot.org Subject: Call for nommu LTP maintainer [was: Re: [PATCH 00/36] Remove UCLINUX from LTP] Message-ID: <20240105131135.GA1484621@pevik> References: <20240103015240.1065284-1-pvorel@suse.cz> <20240103114957.GD1073466@pevik> <5a1f1ff3-8a61-67cf-59a9-ce498738d912@landley.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5a1f1ff3-8a61-67cf-59a9-ce498738d912@landley.net> X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: smtp-out1.suse.de; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_rsa header.b="Uk26/hGB"; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=Dq2NWLSj X-Rspamd-Server: rspamd2.dmz-prg2.suse.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.82 / 50.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.30)[pvorel@suse.cz]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; SPAMHAUS_XBL(0.00)[2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97:from]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[suse.cz:+]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; BAYES_HAM(-0.11)[66.47%]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; URIBL_BLOCKED(0.00)[suse.cz:dkim]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; RCPT_COUNT_TWELVE(0.00)[18]; FUZZY_BLOCKED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: BF64421D34 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240105_051142_111162_78F3B294 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 14.84 ) X-BeenThere: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Petr Vorel Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-riscv" Errors-To: linux-riscv-bounces+linux-riscv=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi all, [ Cc also automated-testing and buildroot ML FYI thread started here: https://lore.kernel.org/ltp/20240103015240.1065284-1-pvorel@suse.cz/ ] > On 1/3/24 06:09, Cyril Hrubis wrote: > > Hi! > >> I am not sure I agree with this series. > >> Removing support for UCLINUX from LTP is almost a guarantee for > >> not noticing when more breakage is introduced. > >> How exactly is UCLINUX broken in LTP? > > As far as we know noone is using it and nobody is maintaing it for a > > decade, > Nobody is maintaining "uclinux" because that was a distro, but you can build > nommu support in buildroot and such, and people do. Right, there are nommu users. Will anybody join LTP development to maintain nommu support in LTP? The needed work is to add this support to LTP new C API [1] and use it in the relevant test. There is some implementation in the old API, I have no idea how well it worked. If nobody stands for maintaing nommu, we will have to delete it. There is nobody from the current maintainers who is using LTP on nommu HW (that is the reason why nommu support have not been implemented in the new API). Kind regards, Petr > Rob [1] https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/wiki/C-Test-API _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5C38C47079 for ; Fri, 5 Jan 2024 13:11:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id C40303CE670 for ; Fri, 5 Jan 2024 14:11:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from in-3.smtp.seeweb.it (in-3.smtp.seeweb.it [IPv6:2001:4b78:1:20::3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1) server-digest SHA384) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A09843CBA58 for ; Fri, 5 Jan 2024 14:11:42 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: in-3.smtp.seeweb.it; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=suse.cz (client-ip=2a07:de40:b251:101:10:150:64:1; helo=smtp-out1.suse.de; envelope-from=pvorel@suse.cz; receiver=lists.linux.it) Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [IPv6:2a07:de40:b251:101:10:150:64:1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-3.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FF2D1A010C3 for ; Fri, 5 Jan 2024 14:11:40 +0100 (CET) Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org [IPv6:2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF64421D34; Fri, 5 Jan 2024 13:11:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1704460298; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=XMu0Tc8M/OGHMVCqGwKKidHMYVyujs8ULbIrYAKyctk=; b=PirfMTLkdWyOzUVVz7p6G2ULi4VhsbiBiEovaWdYP6RmzcuwhtQKKUgKa98M3/Ip8l1k/g XwNng9X+TvSLeuIRIA9U9KlvSfKkHLqoBB1MvKK/dh3zwPOw6svOjDiCk3dtV0Bq+qEnr5 Qv06406TfLtT/5tFFYvfvqWg9SA8IqM= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1704460298; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=XMu0Tc8M/OGHMVCqGwKKidHMYVyujs8ULbIrYAKyctk=; b=/vZmO3d4O+ZOvy2AL7ekQ7g4Fa0ZowPCpSXsCf1l01Jz1p9pxtSiDqKiaPh+6bDpvquCQ9 f3qkaTRGWtQT5+AQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1704460297; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=XMu0Tc8M/OGHMVCqGwKKidHMYVyujs8ULbIrYAKyctk=; b=Uk26/hGBJXjpw8WTegFn/8dWqIzARLH7T6rfeEUvsOk1mAl5RjTrjREnCSUF82cXmbTFX9 ts3XwW8FLL2JAyFOtJWm3lU0iLZC81SdDShl3VZRNMWb0BNeZNSJ3HWfhQaPBCcvuyZzgl B8qt1ml182j0+u5k2jGWDzmk7ft6S0o= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1704460297; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=XMu0Tc8M/OGHMVCqGwKKidHMYVyujs8ULbIrYAKyctk=; b=Dq2NWLSjfkY6KPsXaTn2B4MnPvlbKABhwyuoEx9zmsCM6PoEOnXj0wNXu+xI3t+rB1SZi2 oehXWwFEzy/kGqDg== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DE05136F5; Fri, 5 Jan 2024 13:11:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([10.150.64.162]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id GC9eAgkAmGVEDQAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Fri, 05 Jan 2024 13:11:37 +0000 Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2024 14:11:35 +0100 From: Petr Vorel To: Rob Landley Message-ID: <20240105131135.GA1484621@pevik> References: <20240103015240.1065284-1-pvorel@suse.cz> <20240103114957.GD1073466@pevik> <5a1f1ff3-8a61-67cf-59a9-ce498738d912@landley.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5a1f1ff3-8a61-67cf-59a9-ce498738d912@landley.net> X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: smtp-out1.suse.de; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_rsa header.b="Uk26/hGB"; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=Dq2NWLSj X-Rspamd-Server: rspamd2.dmz-prg2.suse.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.82 / 50.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.30)[pvorel@suse.cz]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; SPAMHAUS_XBL(0.00)[2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97:from]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[suse.cz:+]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; BAYES_HAM(-0.11)[66.47%]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; URIBL_BLOCKED(0.00)[suse.cz:dkim]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; RCPT_COUNT_TWELVE(0.00)[18]; FUZZY_BLOCKED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: BF64421D34 X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.3 at in-3.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: [LTP] Call for nommu LTP maintainer [was: Re: [PATCH 00/36] Remove UCLINUX from LTP] X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Petr Vorel Cc: Jonathan Corbet , Linux-sh list , Christophe Lyon , Randy Dunlap , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, Geert Uytterhoeven , Linux ARM , John Paul Adrian Glaubitz , linux-riscv , buildroot@buildroot.org, Greg Ungerer , ltp@lists.linux.it, automated-testing@lists.yoctoproject.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi all, [ Cc also automated-testing and buildroot ML FYI thread started here: https://lore.kernel.org/ltp/20240103015240.1065284-1-pvorel@suse.cz/ ] > On 1/3/24 06:09, Cyril Hrubis wrote: > > Hi! > >> I am not sure I agree with this series. > >> Removing support for UCLINUX from LTP is almost a guarantee for > >> not noticing when more breakage is introduced. > >> How exactly is UCLINUX broken in LTP? > > As far as we know noone is using it and nobody is maintaing it for a > > decade, > Nobody is maintaining "uclinux" because that was a distro, but you can build > nommu support in buildroot and such, and people do. Right, there are nommu users. Will anybody join LTP development to maintain nommu support in LTP? The needed work is to add this support to LTP new C API [1] and use it in the relevant test. There is some implementation in the old API, I have no idea how well it worked. If nobody stands for maintaing nommu, we will have to delete it. There is nobody from the current maintainers who is using LTP on nommu HW (that is the reason why nommu support have not been implemented in the new API). Kind regards, Petr > Rob [1] https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/wiki/C-Test-API -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0350C3DA6E for ; Fri, 5 Jan 2024 13:12:17 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Reply-To:List-Subscribe:List-Help: List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=Xdqa7FHqzc+4rcH5CoxYkgAAzf9TI1jdn2NfzALFgdU=; b=lKbaSrQfx8VESr ZDHbDBLbU6MGPaySZW3YSj3RkKIS60qFgfNzD8+LuQpgFEjyLcUVM78ZnKKNMV8T8xMtyh+9x/yZE 4fKAUo2aDN+bLhJmrpIxDRPE1+RX/aQauK/SXiCSKuUStiT+JXrm2/xRSF9NF1cfL0YeG/TRh0zQ1 FZXToZLeEgVsiN84/cMX3uBm7bFlISSrrFkxzdLZ3UQXNEfqm4S3V+RDQWxtMCm1c0qS8ie2zFshk KJKyXbQxyw0zdTJNRIheey8XQQvX8hx0qSrla86hbmOjZt/BtWSY6dnq0hqI7EDhiEzajzTtc02FV wiU73Kjyxc/q2C3Rwq0w==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rLjzG-00GvwQ-2a; Fri, 05 Jan 2024 13:11:46 +0000 Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b251:101:10:150:64:1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rLjzB-00Gvsx-2x; Fri, 05 Jan 2024 13:11:44 +0000 Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org [IPv6:2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF64421D34; Fri, 5 Jan 2024 13:11:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1704460298; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=XMu0Tc8M/OGHMVCqGwKKidHMYVyujs8ULbIrYAKyctk=; b=PirfMTLkdWyOzUVVz7p6G2ULi4VhsbiBiEovaWdYP6RmzcuwhtQKKUgKa98M3/Ip8l1k/g XwNng9X+TvSLeuIRIA9U9KlvSfKkHLqoBB1MvKK/dh3zwPOw6svOjDiCk3dtV0Bq+qEnr5 Qv06406TfLtT/5tFFYvfvqWg9SA8IqM= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1704460298; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=XMu0Tc8M/OGHMVCqGwKKidHMYVyujs8ULbIrYAKyctk=; b=/vZmO3d4O+ZOvy2AL7ekQ7g4Fa0ZowPCpSXsCf1l01Jz1p9pxtSiDqKiaPh+6bDpvquCQ9 f3qkaTRGWtQT5+AQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1704460297; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=XMu0Tc8M/OGHMVCqGwKKidHMYVyujs8ULbIrYAKyctk=; b=Uk26/hGBJXjpw8WTegFn/8dWqIzARLH7T6rfeEUvsOk1mAl5RjTrjREnCSUF82cXmbTFX9 ts3XwW8FLL2JAyFOtJWm3lU0iLZC81SdDShl3VZRNMWb0BNeZNSJ3HWfhQaPBCcvuyZzgl B8qt1ml182j0+u5k2jGWDzmk7ft6S0o= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1704460297; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=XMu0Tc8M/OGHMVCqGwKKidHMYVyujs8ULbIrYAKyctk=; b=Dq2NWLSjfkY6KPsXaTn2B4MnPvlbKABhwyuoEx9zmsCM6PoEOnXj0wNXu+xI3t+rB1SZi2 oehXWwFEzy/kGqDg== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DE05136F5; Fri, 5 Jan 2024 13:11:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([10.150.64.162]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id GC9eAgkAmGVEDQAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Fri, 05 Jan 2024 13:11:37 +0000 Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2024 14:11:35 +0100 From: Petr Vorel To: Rob Landley Cc: Cyril Hrubis , Geert Uytterhoeven , ltp@lists.linux.it, Li Wang , Andrea Cervesato , Greg Ungerer , Jonathan Corbet , Randy Dunlap , John Paul Adrian Glaubitz , Christophe Lyon , linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linux ARM , linux-riscv , Linux-sh list , automated-testing@lists.yoctoproject.org, buildroot@buildroot.org Subject: Call for nommu LTP maintainer [was: Re: [PATCH 00/36] Remove UCLINUX from LTP] Message-ID: <20240105131135.GA1484621@pevik> References: <20240103015240.1065284-1-pvorel@suse.cz> <20240103114957.GD1073466@pevik> <5a1f1ff3-8a61-67cf-59a9-ce498738d912@landley.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5a1f1ff3-8a61-67cf-59a9-ce498738d912@landley.net> X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: smtp-out1.suse.de; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_rsa header.b="Uk26/hGB"; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=Dq2NWLSj X-Rspamd-Server: rspamd2.dmz-prg2.suse.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.82 / 50.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.30)[pvorel@suse.cz]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; SPAMHAUS_XBL(0.00)[2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97:from]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[suse.cz:+]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; BAYES_HAM(-0.11)[66.47%]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; URIBL_BLOCKED(0.00)[suse.cz:dkim]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; RCPT_COUNT_TWELVE(0.00)[18]; FUZZY_BLOCKED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: BF64421D34 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240105_051142_111162_78F3B294 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 14.84 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Petr Vorel Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi all, [ Cc also automated-testing and buildroot ML FYI thread started here: https://lore.kernel.org/ltp/20240103015240.1065284-1-pvorel@suse.cz/ ] > On 1/3/24 06:09, Cyril Hrubis wrote: > > Hi! > >> I am not sure I agree with this series. > >> Removing support for UCLINUX from LTP is almost a guarantee for > >> not noticing when more breakage is introduced. > >> How exactly is UCLINUX broken in LTP? > > As far as we know noone is using it and nobody is maintaing it for a > > decade, > Nobody is maintaining "uclinux" because that was a distro, but you can build > nommu support in buildroot and such, and people do. Right, there are nommu users. Will anybody join LTP development to maintain nommu support in LTP? The needed work is to add this support to LTP new C API [1] and use it in the relevant test. There is some implementation in the old API, I have no idea how well it worked. If nobody stands for maintaing nommu, we will have to delete it. There is nobody from the current maintainers who is using LTP on nommu HW (that is the reason why nommu support have not been implemented in the new API). Kind regards, Petr > Rob [1] https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/wiki/C-Test-API _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel