From: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
To: Jian Wen <wenjianhn@gmail.com>
Cc: <oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev>, <lkp@intel.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
Jian Wen <wenjian1@xiaomi.com>, <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>,
Jian Wen <wenjianhn@gmail.com>, <djwong@kernel.org>, <hch@lst.de>,
<dchinner@redhat.com>, <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] xfs: improve handling of prjquot ENOSPC
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 22:08:57 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202401102103.1a66c72-oliver.sang@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240104062248.3245102-1-wenjian1@xiaomi.com>
Hello,
kernel test robot noticed "xfstests.generic.603.fail" on:
commit: 7616836bd77299614d6ff314f6fd6c65b433f56a ("[PATCH v4] xfs: improve handling of prjquot ENOSPC")
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Jian-Wen/xfs-improve-handling-of-prjquot-ENOSPC/20240104-142759
base: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/fs/xfs/xfs-linux.git for-next
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240104062248.3245102-1-wenjian1@xiaomi.com/
patch subject: [PATCH v4] xfs: improve handling of prjquot ENOSPC
in testcase: xfstests
version: xfstests-x86_64-f814a0d8-1_20231225
with following parameters:
disk: 4HDD
fs: xfs
test: generic-603
compiler: gcc-12
test machine: 4 threads Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-6500 CPU @ 3.20GHz (Skylake) with 32G memory
(please refer to attached dmesg/kmsg for entire log/backtrace)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202401102103.1a66c72-oliver.sang@intel.com
2024-01-09 17:34:02 export TEST_DIR=/fs/sda1
2024-01-09 17:34:03 export TEST_DEV=/dev/sda1
2024-01-09 17:34:03 export FSTYP=xfs
2024-01-09 17:34:03 export SCRATCH_MNT=/fs/scratch
2024-01-09 17:34:03 mkdir /fs/scratch -p
2024-01-09 17:34:03 export SCRATCH_DEV=/dev/sda4
2024-01-09 17:34:03 export SCRATCH_LOGDEV=/dev/sda2
meta-data=/dev/sda1 isize=512 agcount=4, agsize=13107200 blks
= sectsz=4096 attr=2, projid32bit=1
= crc=1 finobt=1, sparse=1, rmapbt=0
= reflink=1 bigtime=0
data = bsize=4096 blocks=52428800, imaxpct=25
= sunit=0 swidth=0 blks
naming =version 2 bsize=4096 ascii-ci=0, ftype=1
log =internal log bsize=4096 blocks=25600, version=2
= sectsz=4096 sunit=1 blks, lazy-count=1
realtime =none extsz=4096 blocks=0, rtextents=0
2024-01-09 17:34:03 export MKFS_OPTIONS=-mreflink=1
2024-01-09 17:34:03 echo generic/603
2024-01-09 17:34:04 ./check generic/603
FSTYP -- xfs (debug)
PLATFORM -- Linux/x86_64 lkp-skl-d03 6.7.0-rc4-00137-g7616836bd772 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Mon Jan 8 09:32:19 CST 2024
MKFS_OPTIONS -- -f -mreflink=1 /dev/sda4
MOUNT_OPTIONS -- /dev/sda4 /fs/scratch
generic/603 - output mismatch (see /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/results//generic/603.out.bad)
--- tests/generic/603.out 2023-12-25 18:24:02.000000000 +0000
+++ /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/results//generic/603.out.bad 2024-01-09 17:37:42.162919905 +0000
@@ -7,11 +7,11 @@
Write 225 blocks...
Rewrite 250 blocks plus 1 byte, over the block softlimit...
Try to write 1 one more block after grace...
-pwrite: Disk quota exceeded
+pwrite: No space left on device
--- Test inode quota ---
Create 2 more files, over the inode softlimit...
...
(Run 'diff -u /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/tests/generic/603.out /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/results//generic/603.out.bad' to see the entire diff)
Ran: generic/603
Failures: generic/603
Failed 1 of 1 tests
The kernel config and materials to reproduce are available at:
https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240110/202401102103.1a66c72-oliver.sang@intel.com
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-10 14:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-14 15:07 [PATCH] xfs: improve handling of prjquot ENOSPC Jian Wen
2023-12-14 15:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-12-14 17:06 ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-12-14 21:13 ` Dave Chinner
2023-12-16 15:49 ` Jian Wen
2023-12-16 15:35 ` [PATCH v2] " Jian Wen
2023-12-18 22:00 ` Dave Chinner
2023-12-19 5:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-12-19 13:50 ` Jian Wen
2023-12-23 11:00 ` Jian Wen
2024-01-04 6:22 ` [PATCH v4] " Jian Wen
2024-01-08 0:35 ` Dave Chinner
2024-01-09 6:14 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-01-09 6:38 ` Dave Chinner
2024-01-11 1:42 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-01-11 7:24 ` Dave Chinner
2024-01-10 14:08 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2023-12-23 10:56 ` [PATCH v3] " Jian Wen
2024-01-03 1:42 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-01-03 3:45 ` Jian Wen
2024-01-04 1:46 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-01-04 3:36 ` Jian Wen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202401102103.1a66c72-oliver.sang@intel.com \
--to=oliver.sang@intel.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=wenjian1@xiaomi.com \
--cc=wenjianhn@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.