From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pl1-f182.google.com (mail-pl1-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8632917C61 for ; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 17:05:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=networkplumber.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=networkplumber.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=networkplumber-org.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.i=@networkplumber-org.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.b="C0QfTMmo" Received: by mail-pl1-f182.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1d3f29fea66so49155645ad.3 for ; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 09:05:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1705338351; x=1705943151; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=7dFiktk11TJEZqPAEmrKV1n2sq63GtsFgFs5yp66KSQ=; b=C0QfTMmo+ubqFGXqt6jFOt5vrWkI+paSpMJr0DLjLWPV9McFKW4OylPLhfpeqimdC2 E84CeMaigiLclc/Kiq2wKZh06GO280e+N8ud2QEwDue2amJuA+2ZwMJDAze4eIG4zi7T Dd3SqmFcSk0CLTZejtpC99jB56nuKFo/4bnLtxS36gpeyX7b8kDjEZCG7Z9ygaM7vnGv KprOGDOes4ZVgP0OpnaBA1wH25cMsDjTbwDZiJqg4uq9JxqJwxgvx+ocsZPhPGOyqr07 6pggniYEZXn2vWukwOoCNScBH5yxIV9UcGOm3Cjh1467Iwpq7rhDT0vhuxtX73wiKGWY VDFA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1705338351; x=1705943151; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=7dFiktk11TJEZqPAEmrKV1n2sq63GtsFgFs5yp66KSQ=; b=NK9WUnUagnGB2V3chE+yHORhcTA8AAq9VaeB9J2Zcy6TkC3aBXvhfABa//R2Ro9nsi oO3zQkQnv5yxuNmQ5KpKEadS9nK63MP6IU+/IYggVdvBct3KbX0bAF76eZkduKSx0PYV XCQ187qa6bkuj5fnEjtTswWB4S7fb/9hZqXuqZabXJyKTH31JqIWWmpsuyzJ29lAppGe JnWWn2CmTciJLPEpk2DpGwvvg90dIWjiq3Yi5lKSPa9BGehgfji6OSkTZsjIPUleIKCX JEy1KDRuPbDUHwbg5epSaWrEDXQqzufd1PgDG+cDVY5mLLSuWqADraqDAa6cBSD9Syjb zFfg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yxuuqd2mzVvi14ZJWPDVzEzDMK/MHsfi0+SvUb7hECj9ChYegIL ThlE3bq6OxNlAJTHt6e0ZDVSYS7NeTOPfg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGOxVEKBanujs+tFEQ5mXii+O6Rj1e/nKfr+4O2DEU0OyjuBcNg3/42cX9JY4OcLi0YT1cHUA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:181:b0:1d4:e23e:ea9b with SMTP id z1-20020a170903018100b001d4e23eea9bmr3663846plg.58.1705338350857; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 09:05:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from hermes.local (204-195-123-141.wavecable.com. [204.195.123.141]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ix15-20020a170902f80f00b001d5947f5163sm7541445plb.59.2024.01.15.09.05.50 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 15 Jan 2024 09:05:50 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2024 09:05:48 -0800 From: Stephen Hemminger To: Matthieu Baerts Cc: Quentin Deslandes , netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2] Revert "ss: prevent "Process" column from being printed unless requested" Message-ID: <20240115090548.04eb7f6f@hermes.local> In-Reply-To: <694cc41a-59fd-4b13-a6fe-59782beef373@kernel.org> References: <20240113165458.22935-1-stephen@networkplumber.org> <694cc41a-59fd-4b13-a6fe-59782beef373@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 12:27:23 +0100 Matthieu Baerts wrote: > Hi Stephen, > > On 13/01/2024 17:54, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > This reverts commit 1607bf531fd2f984438d227ea97312df80e7cf56. > > > > This commit is being reverted because it breaks output of tcp info. > > Thank you for having reverted this commit to solve the issue. > > It looks like it breaks more than just TCP info output, please see [1]. > Because of the impact this issue seems to have, do you think it could be > possible to have a v6.7.1 version including this revert patch or the fix > from [1]? Sorry, no this is not a big enough issue for a release.