From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E7EA18632 for ; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 18:29:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="Ewfr4tYE" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1705343394; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Ag0vJpAxvy1phP8+DiRzay9dH6w6lEOujjJkwdgW3Ms=; b=Ewfr4tYEGPJ+c6+E+QeaWaA/m/KISiCO6OGGZ19RgjMPHKNrQRqutkDHCKQtffSU8nGDfo bp0nC3B/VqJMxn2jTWiRG3TYF848V0FCvN5jDPTFAvVHRismZwp6Widr4N+rCyPZv2AGzo mVGL0HpVdmdNsIYW0oLnJFjkR5RwcBo= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-524-gtPuUKmVNkepiGK9gfrrwA-1; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 13:29:50 -0500 X-MC-Unique: gtPuUKmVNkepiGK9gfrrwA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.9]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6C8A185A781; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 18:29:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [10.39.192.194]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10F5B492BC6; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 18:29:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2024 13:29:44 -0500 From: Stefan Hajnoczi To: Li RongQing Cc: vgoyal@redhat.com, miklos@szeredi.hu, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio_fs: remove duplicate check if queue is broken Message-ID: <20240115182944.GA1143584@fedora> References: <20240115071505.43917-1-lirongqing@baidu.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="oyER+1Wr1RKIsoXg" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240115071505.43917-1-lirongqing@baidu.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.11.54.9 --oyER+1Wr1RKIsoXg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 03:15:05PM +0800, Li RongQing wrote: > virtqueue_enable_cb() will call virtqueue_poll() which will check if > queue is broken at beginning, so remove the virtqueue_is_broken() call >=20 > Signed-off-by: Li RongQing > --- > fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi --oyER+1Wr1RKIsoXg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEhpWov9P5fNqsNXdanKSrs4Grc8gFAmWleZgACgkQnKSrs4Gr c8jYHggAhlBI7bzkMxhpKyBi8eW4EuEJcsAowxkBQFjFDSA9QGamf4cLDJnTIfO+ j0DpLOaLXUo+gXvBdw15pdt47xzafnNZnyhP4kVwh2uuL8tTPIUFmEzWPAlz20IN rpwoZ+q/3mlCVsQdbndpy9azgTng/TF9rtSp7guYNuKiU8xGvncnT8/dxSU9XBrZ l9Z9tn60P5Q8xqyXvP+LVoUhIuo9RNTBp5fj7UBHZNpM533tMCRRnXJiYFExMkeP KH2spR6aXa63kibnU2r6N2pEko1//B+NEpKsI9cZBsNPW3K0TfXndb/JMQOmRRnF 09NV9nyh6y3zP3UdYtLU4iX6ug4Lyw== =YjaL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --oyER+1Wr1RKIsoXg--