[PATCH 2/2] wifi: rtl8xxxu: make instances of iface limit and combination to be static const

[Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>]

rtl8xxxu_limits and rtl8xxxu_combinations can be static const, so add
modifiers as desire. Otherwise, Sparse reports warnings

rtl8xxxu_core.c:7677:30: warning: symbol 'rtl8xxxu_limits' was not declared. Should it be static?
rtl8xxxu_core.c:7682:36: warning: symbol 'rtl8xxxu_combinations' was not declared. Should it be static?

Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c
index 98700f3ad6f9..3b954c2fe448 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c
@@ -7674,12 +7674,12 @@ static void rtl8xxxu_deinit_led(struct rtl8xxxu_priv *priv)
 	led_classdev_unregister(led);
 }
 
-struct ieee80211_iface_limit rtl8xxxu_limits[] = {
+static const struct ieee80211_iface_limit rtl8xxxu_limits[] = {
 	{ .max = 2, .types = BIT(NL80211_IFTYPE_STATION), },
 	{ .max = 1, .types = BIT(NL80211_IFTYPE_AP), },
 };
 
-struct ieee80211_iface_combination rtl8xxxu_combinations[] = {
+static const struct ieee80211_iface_combination rtl8xxxu_combinations[] = {
 	{
 		.limits = rtl8xxxu_limits,
 		.n_limits = ARRAY_SIZE(rtl8xxxu_limits),
-- 
2.25.1