From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1C0EC47258 for ; Wed, 17 Jan 2024 11:44:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 515BD3CE316 for ; Wed, 17 Jan 2024 12:44:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from in-2.smtp.seeweb.it (in-2.smtp.seeweb.it [IPv6:2001:4b78:1:20::2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF9E23C88E1 for ; Wed, 17 Jan 2024 12:44:14 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: in-2.smtp.seeweb.it; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=suse.cz (client-ip=2a07:de40:b251:101:10:150:64:2; helo=smtp-out2.suse.de; envelope-from=pvorel@suse.cz; receiver=lists.linux.it) Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [IPv6:2a07:de40:b251:101:10:150:64:2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-2.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5883360091B for ; Wed, 17 Jan 2024 12:44:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org [IPv6:2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BB901FC05; Wed, 17 Jan 2024 11:44:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1705491853; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=0V5EO6QS4VOCGXCI+CEKZl4DbQcXcxyvV0pF844Z0eE=; b=pp8K5sp7aYOVcLpOvcbLj+gK/TTOGxXBhvw2x1rPOfBuM6oOfu0647Z0yd9jpL23P3qE40 D3nzIgs0sKNoR1VmqIDCG8fz5cyU/QSuGK5GrKZdFyKATJPqhtLbFgJmVchesHqV8loyY3 NJ8lH5dOOHqIFhxzdfeuxkHm08urNTE= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1705491853; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=0V5EO6QS4VOCGXCI+CEKZl4DbQcXcxyvV0pF844Z0eE=; b=Tr1dE5/yqs9HkzPYNzujutjq9QXXt+guzCcsr0KObZGwozJ43QBDTtfnyBtLavvf1lu9wz +vmHWXCBe8RXveDw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1705491853; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=0V5EO6QS4VOCGXCI+CEKZl4DbQcXcxyvV0pF844Z0eE=; b=pp8K5sp7aYOVcLpOvcbLj+gK/TTOGxXBhvw2x1rPOfBuM6oOfu0647Z0yd9jpL23P3qE40 D3nzIgs0sKNoR1VmqIDCG8fz5cyU/QSuGK5GrKZdFyKATJPqhtLbFgJmVchesHqV8loyY3 NJ8lH5dOOHqIFhxzdfeuxkHm08urNTE= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1705491853; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=0V5EO6QS4VOCGXCI+CEKZl4DbQcXcxyvV0pF844Z0eE=; b=Tr1dE5/yqs9HkzPYNzujutjq9QXXt+guzCcsr0KObZGwozJ43QBDTtfnyBtLavvf1lu9wz +vmHWXCBe8RXveDw== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FCA813751; Wed, 17 Jan 2024 11:44:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([10.150.64.162]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id lVzOGY29p2VASgAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Wed, 17 Jan 2024 11:44:13 +0000 Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 12:44:12 +0100 From: Petr Vorel To: Cyril Hrubis Message-ID: <20240117114412.GA2700187@pevik> References: <20240117101801.12536-1-chrubis@suse.cz> <20240117110744.GA2692706@pevik> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: smtp-out2.suse.de; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=pp8K5sp7; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b="Tr1dE5/y" X-Rspamd-Server: rspamd2.dmz-prg2.suse.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.76 / 50.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.30)[pvorel@suse.cz]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; SPAMHAUS_XBL(0.00)[2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97:from]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_BLOCKED(0.00)[suse.cz:dkim]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[suse.cz:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[suse.cz:dkim]; FUZZY_BLOCKED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; BAYES_HAM(-0.05)[60.25%] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 8BB901FC05 X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.3 at in-2.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] lib: TST_EXP_FAIL: Fix the *_ARR_() macros X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Petr Vorel Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" > Hi! > > I'm sorry, I haven't noticed the problem. tst_test_macros.h is getting quite > > complex, maybe we should add some comments into the header. > Pushed, thanks. > I guess that ideal fix would be comparing the output from the newlib > TST_EXP_* tescases with expected output. That would actually catch most > of the bugs introduced in there. I've had it on my TODO list, hope to get to it sometimes in February. Kind regards, Petr -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp