From: thinker.li@gmail.com
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev,
song@kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com, andrii@kernel.org,
drosen@google.com
Cc: sinquersw@gmail.com, kuifeng@meta.com,
Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v17 10/14] bpf: validate value_type
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2024 14:50:01 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240119225005.668602-11-thinker.li@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240119225005.668602-1-thinker.li@gmail.com>
From: Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>
A value_type should consist of three components: refcnt, state, and data.
refcnt and state has been move to struct bpf_struct_ops_common_value to
make it easier to check the value type.
Signed-off-by: Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>
---
include/linux/bpf.h | 12 +++++
kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c | 93 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
2 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index 91714edd6193..90f78f04e139 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -1688,6 +1688,18 @@ struct bpf_struct_ops_desc {
u32 value_id;
};
+enum bpf_struct_ops_state {
+ BPF_STRUCT_OPS_STATE_INIT,
+ BPF_STRUCT_OPS_STATE_INUSE,
+ BPF_STRUCT_OPS_STATE_TOBEFREE,
+ BPF_STRUCT_OPS_STATE_READY,
+};
+
+struct bpf_struct_ops_common_value {
+ refcount_t refcnt;
+ enum bpf_struct_ops_state state;
+};
+
#if defined(CONFIG_BPF_JIT) && defined(CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL)
#define BPF_MODULE_OWNER ((void *)((0xeB9FUL << 2) + POISON_POINTER_DELTA))
const struct bpf_struct_ops_desc *bpf_struct_ops_find(struct btf *btf, u32 type_id);
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
index 02216a8d9265..30ab34fab0f8 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
@@ -13,19 +13,8 @@
#include <linux/btf_ids.h>
#include <linux/rcupdate_wait.h>
-enum bpf_struct_ops_state {
- BPF_STRUCT_OPS_STATE_INIT,
- BPF_STRUCT_OPS_STATE_INUSE,
- BPF_STRUCT_OPS_STATE_TOBEFREE,
- BPF_STRUCT_OPS_STATE_READY,
-};
-
-#define BPF_STRUCT_OPS_COMMON_VALUE \
- refcount_t refcnt; \
- enum bpf_struct_ops_state state
-
struct bpf_struct_ops_value {
- BPF_STRUCT_OPS_COMMON_VALUE;
+ struct bpf_struct_ops_common_value common;
char data[] ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
};
@@ -81,8 +70,8 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(update_mutex);
#define BPF_STRUCT_OPS_TYPE(_name) \
extern struct bpf_struct_ops bpf_##_name; \
\
-struct bpf_struct_ops_##_name { \
- BPF_STRUCT_OPS_COMMON_VALUE; \
+struct bpf_struct_ops_##_name { \
+ struct bpf_struct_ops_common_value common; \
struct _name data ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp; \
};
#include "bpf_struct_ops_types.h"
@@ -113,11 +102,49 @@ const struct bpf_prog_ops bpf_struct_ops_prog_ops = {
BTF_ID_LIST(st_ops_ids)
BTF_ID(struct, module)
+BTF_ID(struct, bpf_struct_ops_common_value)
enum {
IDX_MODULE_ID,
+ IDX_ST_OPS_COMMON_VALUE_ID,
};
+extern struct btf *btf_vmlinux;
+
+static bool is_valid_value_type(struct btf *btf, s32 value_id,
+ const struct btf_type *type,
+ const char *value_name)
+{
+ const struct btf_type *common_value_type;
+ const struct btf_member *member;
+ const struct btf_type *vt, *mt;
+
+ vt = btf_type_by_id(btf, value_id);
+ if (btf_vlen(vt) != 2) {
+ pr_warn("The number of %s's members should be 2, but we get %d\n",
+ value_name, btf_vlen(vt));
+ return false;
+ }
+ member = btf_type_member(vt);
+ mt = btf_type_by_id(btf, member->type);
+ common_value_type = btf_type_by_id(btf_vmlinux,
+ st_ops_ids[IDX_ST_OPS_COMMON_VALUE_ID]);
+ if (mt != common_value_type) {
+ pr_warn("The first member of %s should be bpf_struct_ops_common_value\n",
+ value_name);
+ return false;
+ }
+ member++;
+ mt = btf_type_by_id(btf, member->type);
+ if (mt != type) {
+ pr_warn("The second member of %s should be %s\n",
+ value_name, btf_name_by_offset(btf, type->name_off));
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ return true;
+}
+
static void bpf_struct_ops_desc_init(struct bpf_struct_ops_desc *st_ops_desc,
struct btf *btf,
struct bpf_verifier_log *log)
@@ -138,14 +165,6 @@ static void bpf_struct_ops_desc_init(struct bpf_struct_ops_desc *st_ops_desc,
}
sprintf(value_name, "%s%s", VALUE_PREFIX, st_ops->name);
- value_id = btf_find_by_name_kind(btf, value_name,
- BTF_KIND_STRUCT);
- if (value_id < 0) {
- pr_warn("Cannot find struct %s in %s\n",
- value_name, btf_get_name(btf));
- return;
- }
-
type_id = btf_find_by_name_kind(btf, st_ops->name,
BTF_KIND_STRUCT);
if (type_id < 0) {
@@ -160,6 +179,16 @@ static void bpf_struct_ops_desc_init(struct bpf_struct_ops_desc *st_ops_desc,
return;
}
+ value_id = btf_find_by_name_kind(btf, value_name,
+ BTF_KIND_STRUCT);
+ if (value_id < 0) {
+ pr_warn("Cannot find struct %s in %s\n",
+ value_name, btf_get_name(btf));
+ return;
+ }
+ if (!is_valid_value_type(btf, value_id, t, value_name))
+ return;
+
for_each_member(i, t, member) {
const struct btf_type *func_proto;
@@ -219,8 +248,6 @@ void bpf_struct_ops_init(struct btf *btf, struct bpf_verifier_log *log)
}
}
-extern struct btf *btf_vmlinux;
-
static const struct bpf_struct_ops_desc *
bpf_struct_ops_find_value(struct btf *btf, u32 value_id)
{
@@ -276,7 +303,7 @@ int bpf_struct_ops_map_sys_lookup_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
kvalue = &st_map->kvalue;
/* Pair with smp_store_release() during map_update */
- state = smp_load_acquire(&kvalue->state);
+ state = smp_load_acquire(&kvalue->common.state);
if (state == BPF_STRUCT_OPS_STATE_INIT) {
memset(value, 0, map->value_size);
return 0;
@@ -287,7 +314,7 @@ int bpf_struct_ops_map_sys_lookup_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
*/
uvalue = value;
memcpy(uvalue, st_map->uvalue, map->value_size);
- uvalue->state = state;
+ uvalue->common.state = state;
/* This value offers the user space a general estimate of how
* many sockets are still utilizing this struct_ops for TCP
@@ -295,7 +322,7 @@ int bpf_struct_ops_map_sys_lookup_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
* should sufficiently meet our present goals.
*/
refcnt = atomic64_read(&map->refcnt) - atomic64_read(&map->usercnt);
- refcount_set(&uvalue->refcnt, max_t(s64, refcnt, 0));
+ refcount_set(&uvalue->common.refcnt, max_t(s64, refcnt, 0));
return 0;
}
@@ -413,7 +440,7 @@ static long bpf_struct_ops_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
if (err)
return err;
- if (uvalue->state || refcount_read(&uvalue->refcnt))
+ if (uvalue->common.state || refcount_read(&uvalue->common.refcnt))
return -EINVAL;
tlinks = kcalloc(BPF_TRAMP_MAX, sizeof(*tlinks), GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -425,7 +452,7 @@ static long bpf_struct_ops_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
mutex_lock(&st_map->lock);
- if (kvalue->state != BPF_STRUCT_OPS_STATE_INIT) {
+ if (kvalue->common.state != BPF_STRUCT_OPS_STATE_INIT) {
err = -EBUSY;
goto unlock;
}
@@ -540,7 +567,7 @@ static long bpf_struct_ops_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
*
* Pair with smp_load_acquire() during lookup_elem().
*/
- smp_store_release(&kvalue->state, BPF_STRUCT_OPS_STATE_READY);
+ smp_store_release(&kvalue->common.state, BPF_STRUCT_OPS_STATE_READY);
goto unlock;
}
@@ -558,7 +585,7 @@ static long bpf_struct_ops_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
* It ensures the above udata updates (e.g. prog->aux->id)
* can be seen once BPF_STRUCT_OPS_STATE_INUSE is set.
*/
- smp_store_release(&kvalue->state, BPF_STRUCT_OPS_STATE_INUSE);
+ smp_store_release(&kvalue->common.state, BPF_STRUCT_OPS_STATE_INUSE);
goto unlock;
}
@@ -588,7 +615,7 @@ static long bpf_struct_ops_map_delete_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key)
if (st_map->map.map_flags & BPF_F_LINK)
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
- prev_state = cmpxchg(&st_map->kvalue.state,
+ prev_state = cmpxchg(&st_map->kvalue.common.state,
BPF_STRUCT_OPS_STATE_INUSE,
BPF_STRUCT_OPS_STATE_TOBEFREE);
switch (prev_state) {
@@ -848,7 +875,7 @@ static bool bpf_struct_ops_valid_to_reg(struct bpf_map *map)
return map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS &&
map->map_flags & BPF_F_LINK &&
/* Pair with smp_store_release() during map_update */
- smp_load_acquire(&st_map->kvalue.state) == BPF_STRUCT_OPS_STATE_READY;
+ smp_load_acquire(&st_map->kvalue.common.state) == BPF_STRUCT_OPS_STATE_READY;
}
static void bpf_struct_ops_map_link_dealloc(struct bpf_link *link)
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-19 22:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-19 22:49 [PATCH bpf-next v17 00/14] Registrating struct_ops types from modules thinker.li
2024-01-19 22:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v17 01/14] bpf: refactory struct_ops type initialization to a function thinker.li
2024-01-19 22:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v17 02/14] bpf: get type information with BTF_ID_LIST thinker.li
2024-01-19 22:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v17 03/14] bpf, net: introduce bpf_struct_ops_desc thinker.li
2024-01-19 22:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v17 04/14] bpf: add struct_ops_tab to btf thinker.li
2024-01-19 22:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v17 05/14] bpf: make struct_ops_map support btfs other than btf_vmlinux thinker.li
2024-01-19 22:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v17 06/14] bpf: pass btf object id in bpf_map_info thinker.li
2024-01-19 22:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v17 07/14] bpf: lookup struct_ops types from a given module BTF thinker.li
2024-01-19 22:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next v17 08/14] bpf: pass attached BTF to the bpf_struct_ops subsystem thinker.li
2024-01-19 22:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v17 09/14] bpf: hold module refcnt in bpf_struct_ops map creation and prog verification thinker.li
2024-01-19 22:50 ` thinker.li [this message]
2024-01-19 22:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v17 11/14] bpf, net: switch to dynamic registration thinker.li
2024-01-23 7:11 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2024-01-19 22:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v17 12/14] libbpf: Find correct module BTFs for struct_ops maps and progs thinker.li
2024-01-19 22:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v17 13/14] bpf: export btf_ctx_access to modules thinker.li
2024-01-19 22:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v17 14/14] selftests/bpf: test case for register_bpf_struct_ops() thinker.li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240119225005.668602-11-thinker.li@gmail.com \
--to=thinker.li@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=drosen@google.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kuifeng@meta.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=sinquersw@gmail.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.