From: Changbin Du <changbin.du@huawei.com>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Changbin Du <changbin.du@huawei.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>, <changbin.du@gmail.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] perf: util: use capstone disasm engine to show assembly instructions
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2024 17:13:28 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240120091328.wmk27ktpps2ky5cl@M910t> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e3463435-b879-4d72-9cab-c4bf951b9084@intel.com>
On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 08:39:19PM +0200, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> On 19/01/24 12:48, Changbin Du wrote:
> > Currently, the instructions of samples are shown as raw hex strings
> > which are hard to read. x86 has a special option '--xed' to disassemble
> > the hex string via intel XED tool.
> >
> > Here we use capstone as our disassembler engine to give more friendly
> > instructions. We select libcapstone because capstone can provide more
> > insn details. Perf will fallback to raw instructions if libcapstone is
> > not available.
> >
> > The advantages compared to XED tool:
> > * Support arm, arm64, x86-32, x86_64 (more could be supported),
> > xed only for x86_64.
> > * Immediate address operands are shown as symbol+offs.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Changbin Du <changbin.du@huawei.com>
> > ---
> > tools/perf/builtin-script.c | 8 +--
> > tools/perf/util/Build | 1 +
> > tools/perf/util/print_insn.c | 122 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > tools/perf/util/print_insn.h | 14 ++++
> > 4 files changed, 140 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > create mode 100644 tools/perf/util/print_insn.c
> > create mode 100644 tools/perf/util/print_insn.h
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-script.c b/tools/perf/builtin-script.c
> > index b1f57401ff23..4817a37f16e2 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/builtin-script.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-script.c
> > @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
> > #include "util/event.h"
> > #include "ui/ui.h"
> > #include "print_binary.h"
> > +#include "print_insn.h"
> > #include "archinsn.h"
> > #include <linux/bitmap.h>
> > #include <linux/kernel.h>
> > @@ -1511,11 +1512,8 @@ static int perf_sample__fprintf_insn(struct perf_sample *sample,
> > if (PRINT_FIELD(INSNLEN))
> > printed += fprintf(fp, " ilen: %d", sample->insn_len);
> > if (PRINT_FIELD(INSN) && sample->insn_len) {
> > - int i;
> > -
> > - printed += fprintf(fp, " insn:");
> > - for (i = 0; i < sample->insn_len; i++)
> > - printed += fprintf(fp, " %02x", (unsigned char)sample->insn[i]);
> > + printed += fprintf(fp, " insn: ");
>
> "insn:" seems unnecessary. Also xed prints 2 tabs, which
> helps line up the output. Perhaps 1 tab and 2 spaces is
> enough.
>
The "insn:" is used by xed. So it can not be removed if we preserve xed
function.
For 'insn' field, I keep the original output format.
For 'disasm' field, we can line up the output. I changed to 2 tabs and removed
'insn:'.
> > + printed += sample__fprintf_insn_raw(sample, fp);
> > }
> > if (PRINT_FIELD(BRSTACKINSN) || PRINT_FIELD(BRSTACKINSNLEN))
> > printed += perf_sample__fprintf_brstackinsn(sample, thread, attr, machine, fp);
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/Build b/tools/perf/util/Build
> > index 988473bf907a..c33aab53d8dd 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/util/Build
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/Build
> > @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ perf-y += perf_regs.o
> > perf-y += perf-regs-arch/
> > perf-y += path.o
> > perf-y += print_binary.o
> > +perf-y += print_insn.o
> > perf-y += rlimit.o
> > perf-y += argv_split.o
> > perf-y += rbtree.o
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/print_insn.c b/tools/perf/util/print_insn.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..162be4856f79
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/print_insn.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,122 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +/*
> > + * Instruction binary disassembler based on capstone.
> > + *
> > + * Author(s): Changbin Du <changbin.du@huawei.com>
> > + */
> > +#include "print_insn.h"
>
> Please put with the other non-system includes
>
done.
> > +#include <stdlib.h>
> > +#include <string.h>
> > +#include <stdbool.h>
> > +#include "util/debug.h"
>
> util/ not needed
>
done.
> > +#include "util/symbol.h"
>
> util/ not needed
>
done.
> > +#include "machine.h"
> > +
> > +size_t sample__fprintf_insn_raw(struct perf_sample *sample, FILE *fp)
> > +{
> > + int printed = 0;
> > +
> > + for (int i = 0; i < sample->insn_len; i++)
> > + printed += fprintf(fp, "%02x ", (unsigned char)sample->insn[i]);
>
> Why change this to put a space on the end?
>
Removed the tailing space.
> > + return printed;
> > +}
> > +
> > +#ifdef HAVE_LIBCAPSTONE_SUPPORT
> > +#include <capstone/capstone.h>
> > +
> > +static int capstone_init(struct machine *machine, csh *cs_handle)
> > +{
> > + cs_arch arch;
> > + cs_mode mode;
> > +
> > + if (machine__is(machine, "x86_64")) {
> > + arch = CS_ARCH_X86;
> > + mode = CS_MODE_64;
> > + } else if (machine__normalized_is(machine, "x86")) {
> > + arch = CS_ARCH_X86;
> > + mode = CS_MODE_32;
> > + } else if (machine__normalized_is(machine, "arm64")) {
> > + arch = CS_ARCH_ARM64;
> > + mode = CS_MODE_ARM;
> > + } else if (machine__normalized_is(machine, "arm")) {
> > + arch = CS_ARCH_ARM;
> > + mode = CS_MODE_ARM + CS_MODE_V8;
> > + } else if (machine__normalized_is(machine, "s390")) {
> > + arch = CS_ARCH_SYSZ;
> > + mode = CS_MODE_BIG_ENDIAN;
> > + } else {
> > + return -1;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (cs_open(arch, mode, cs_handle) != CS_ERR_OK) {
> > + pr_warning_once("cs_open failed\n");
> > + return -1;
> > + }
> > +
> > + cs_option(*cs_handle, CS_OPT_SYNTAX, CS_OPT_SYNTAX_ATT);
>
> That's only needed for x86 isn't it
>
Moved into below branch.
> > + if (machine__normalized_is(machine, "x86"))
> > + cs_option(*cs_handle, CS_OPT_DETAIL, CS_OPT_ON);
>
> Why? Could use a comment.
>
/*
* Resolving address oprands to symbols is implemented
* on x86 by investigating instruction details.
*/
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static size_t print_insn_x86(struct perf_sample *sample, struct thread *thread,
> > + cs_insn *insn, FILE *fp)
> > +{
> > + struct addr_location al;
> > + size_t printed = 0;
> > +
> > + if (insn->detail && insn->detail->x86.op_count == 1) {
> > + cs_x86_op *op = &insn->detail->x86.operands[0];
> > +
> > + addr_location__init(&al);
>
> Missing addr_location__exit()
>
Fixed.
> > +
> > + if (op->type == X86_OP_IMM &&
> > + thread__find_symbol(thread, sample->cpumode, op->imm, &al)) {
> > + printed += fprintf(fp, "%s ", insn[0].mnemonic);
> > + printed += symbol__fprintf_symname_offs(al.sym, &al, fp);
> > + return printed;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + printed += fprintf(fp, "%s %s", insn[0].mnemonic, insn[0].op_str);
> > + return printed;
> > +}
> > +
> > +size_t sample__fprintf_insn(struct perf_sample *sample, struct thread *thread,
> > + struct machine *machine, FILE *fp)
> > +{
> > + static csh cs_handle;
>
> Why static?
>
Removed. See below.
> > + cs_insn *insn;
> > + size_t count;
> > + size_t printed = 0;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + ret = capstone_init(machine, &cs_handle);
>
> Does this really need to be done every time?
>
Only need to init once exactly. The problem is I cannot find a appropriate
place to do the initiation.
I tried to initiate on first call but we still need a global mutex to be
initiated.
So finally I fallback to initiate every time. The redundant initiation is
acceptable per my test.
> > + if (ret < 0) {
> > + /* fallback */
> > + return sample__fprintf_insn_raw(sample, fp);
> > + }
> > +
> > + count = cs_disasm(cs_handle, (uint8_t *)sample->insn, sample->insn_len,
> > + sample->ip, 1, &insn);
> > + if (count > 0) {
> > + if (machine__normalized_is(machine, "x86"))
> > + printed += print_insn_x86(sample, thread, &insn[0], fp);
> > + else
> > + printed += fprintf(fp, "%s %s", insn[0].mnemonic, insn[0].op_str);
> > + cs_free(insn, count);
> > + } else {
> > + printed += fprintf(fp, "illegal instruction");
> > + }
> > +
> > + cs_close(&cs_handle);
> > + return printed;
> > +}
> > +#else
> > +size_t sample__fprintf_insn(struct perf_sample *sample, struct thread *thread __maybe_unused,
> > + struct machine *machine __maybe_unused, FILE *fp)
> > +{
> > + return sample__fprintf_insn_raw(sample, fp);
> > +}
> > +#endif
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/print_insn.h b/tools/perf/util/print_insn.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..af8fa5d01fb7
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/print_insn.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
> > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> > +#ifndef PERF_PRINT_ISNS_H
>
> Here and elsewhere
>
> ISNS -> INSN
>
fixed.
> > +#define PERF_PRINT_ISNS_H
> > +
> > +#include <stddef.h>
> > +#include <stdio.h>
> > +#include "event.h"
> > +#include "util/thread.h"
>
> Instead of including event.h and thread.h, just forward declare:
>
> struct perf_sample;
> struct thread;
> struct machine;
>
Why forward declaration?
> > +
> > +size_t sample__fprintf_insn(struct perf_sample *sample, struct thread *thread,
> > + struct machine *machine, FILE *fp);
> > +size_t sample__fprintf_insn_raw(struct perf_sample *sample, FILE *fp);
> > +
> > +#endif /* PERF_PRINT_ISNS_H */
>
--
Cheers,
Changbin Du
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-20 9:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-19 10:48 [PATCH v4 0/5] perf: script: Intro capstone disasm engine to show instruction trace Changbin Du
2024-01-19 10:48 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] perf: build: introduce the libcapstone Changbin Du
2024-01-19 18:38 ` Adrian Hunter
2024-01-20 7:23 ` Changbin Du
2024-01-19 10:48 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] perf: util: use capstone disasm engine to show assembly instructions Changbin Du
2024-01-19 18:39 ` Adrian Hunter
2024-01-20 9:13 ` Changbin Du [this message]
2024-01-22 8:24 ` Adrian Hunter
2024-01-22 8:42 ` Changbin Du
2024-01-19 10:48 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] perf: script: add field 'disasm' to display mnemonic instructions Changbin Du
2024-01-19 18:39 ` Adrian Hunter
2024-01-20 7:40 ` Changbin Du
2024-01-22 9:59 ` Adrian Hunter
2024-01-22 10:46 ` Changbin Du
2024-01-22 13:41 ` Andi Kleen
2024-01-22 14:05 ` Changbin Du
2024-01-19 10:48 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] perf: script: add raw|disasm arguments to --insn-trace option Changbin Du
2024-01-19 18:39 ` Adrian Hunter
2024-01-20 7:30 ` Changbin Du
2024-01-19 10:48 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] perf: script: prefer capstone to XED Changbin Du
2024-01-19 18:40 ` Adrian Hunter
2024-01-20 7:26 ` Changbin Du
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240120091328.wmk27ktpps2ky5cl@M910t \
--to=changbin.du@huawei.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=changbin.du@gmail.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tmricht@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.