All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: kernel@openeuler.org
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev
Subject: [openeuler:OLK-6.6 2490/2572] kernel/sched/core.c:9719:2: error: call to undeclared function 'tg_update_affinity_domains'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 11:27:09 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202401241115.amp9PdWR-lkp@intel.com> (raw)

tree:   https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git OLK-6.6
head:   a662a03b9d1d5b93551f9c0f9c2875373b223115
commit: 6eb07f9925a906d81f328c808ba25f7800888dce [2490/2572] sched: Introduce smart grid scheduling strategy for cfs
config: arm64-randconfig-002-20240124 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240124/202401241115.amp9PdWR-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 15.0.7 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git 8dfdcc7b7bf66834a761bd8de445840ef68e4d1a)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240124/202401241115.amp9PdWR-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202401241115.amp9PdWR-lkp@intel.com/

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

>> kernel/sched/core.c:9719:2: error: call to undeclared function 'tg_update_affinity_domains'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
           tg_update_affinity_domains(cpu, 1);
           ^
   kernel/sched/core.c:9719:2: note: did you mean 'irq_update_affinity_hint'?
   include/linux/interrupt.h:325:1: note: 'irq_update_affinity_hint' declared here
   irq_update_affinity_hint(unsigned int irq, const struct cpumask *m)
   ^
   kernel/sched/core.c:9809:2: error: call to undeclared function 'tg_update_affinity_domains'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
           tg_update_affinity_domains(cpu, 0);
           ^
>> kernel/sched/core.c:9931:2: error: call to undeclared function 'init_auto_affinity'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
           init_auto_affinity(&root_task_group);
           ^
   kernel/sched/core.c:9931:2: note: did you mean 'irq_set_affinity'?
   include/linux/interrupt.h:308:12: note: 'irq_set_affinity' declared here
   extern int irq_set_affinity(unsigned int irq, const struct cpumask *cpumask);
              ^
   kernel/sched/core.c:9931:22: error: use of undeclared identifier 'root_task_group'; did you mean 'task_group'?
           init_auto_affinity(&root_task_group);
                               ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                               task_group
   kernel/sched/sched.h:2140:34: note: 'task_group' declared here
   static inline struct task_group *task_group(struct task_struct *p)
                                    ^
   4 errors generated.


vim +/tg_update_affinity_domains +9719 kernel/sched/core.c

  9699	
  9700	int sched_cpu_activate(unsigned int cpu)
  9701	{
  9702		struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
  9703		struct rq_flags rf;
  9704	
  9705		/*
  9706		 * Clear the balance_push callback and prepare to schedule
  9707		 * regular tasks.
  9708		 */
  9709		balance_push_set(cpu, false);
  9710	
  9711	#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_SMT
  9712		/*
  9713		 * When going up, increment the number of cores with SMT present.
  9714		 */
  9715		if (cpumask_weight(cpu_smt_mask(cpu)) == 2)
  9716			static_branch_inc_cpuslocked(&sched_smt_present);
  9717	#endif
  9718		set_cpu_active(cpu, true);
> 9719		tg_update_affinity_domains(cpu, 1);
  9720	
  9721		if (sched_smp_initialized) {
  9722			sched_update_numa(cpu, true);
  9723			sched_domains_numa_masks_set(cpu);
  9724			cpuset_cpu_active();
  9725		}
  9726	
  9727		/*
  9728		 * Put the rq online, if not already. This happens:
  9729		 *
  9730		 * 1) In the early boot process, because we build the real domains
  9731		 *    after all CPUs have been brought up.
  9732		 *
  9733		 * 2) At runtime, if cpuset_cpu_active() fails to rebuild the
  9734		 *    domains.
  9735		 */
  9736		rq_lock_irqsave(rq, &rf);
  9737		if (rq->rd) {
  9738			BUG_ON(!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, rq->rd->span));
  9739			set_rq_online(rq);
  9740		}
  9741		rq_unlock_irqrestore(rq, &rf);
  9742	
  9743		return 0;
  9744	}
  9745	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

             reply	other threads:[~2024-01-24  3:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-24  3:27 kernel test robot [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-01-24  2:05 [openeuler:OLK-6.6 2490/2572] kernel/sched/core.c:9719:2: error: call to undeclared function 'tg_update_affinity_domains'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations kernel test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202401241115.amp9PdWR-lkp@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=kernel@openeuler.org \
    --cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.