From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15DB3136F for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2024 01:46:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706147214; cv=none; b=G8eaFYHmCD2/sVqI4QbgNWClYQTEjzMjm5fy1lRFStQA922yNcMMRuiXYXeWBOvYtLHLzAIjVMyzQbc2u+RmjZ3QcLvQprwwLg9vEG3v6TJsvVJSiEIqPP7ZJpiwffv5fHEN+HwtXAwZH2p1CYoG3TOIP3hmNYdi4H04ySDobSc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706147214; c=relaxed/simple; bh=DxNHxjQDkc1QD619p/JjXngvCug49O1ClJEFlQM5+t0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=KD9yAG/7xdKzYHbLZZfJQsHaLWDDX50DzlhtVk6cAzV67uT2VfmuHlSeLN/HU2Tx7qNNG+uagEqEWyN70Q+Wm99uznUxiTz006nmtrGUi36omYuB8rVSk2cF9/vX+D3rO/2vdXXpGHVdCevfWP0ZDyGQdXCWZR+icBW2OJ6Q/Cs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Cw/R03sD; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Cw/R03sD" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 56AA2C433F1; Thu, 25 Jan 2024 01:46:53 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1706147213; bh=DxNHxjQDkc1QD619p/JjXngvCug49O1ClJEFlQM5+t0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Cw/R03sDT3a4KP4V1vkgxobrpvyAZq/yPRCufPOlupLytQH0sxBh9vQSxoRbYrI/5 LuT8rCLPvRc0nUBp0yGH4rqfrbrUlAH55dSiC/DU+jjDDHdM+0BS2Q7Ynu8ZHfK940 F0SU+wpOFb6+kjSQesG8/LQnd0fr2NzuGHYase9EkBjtoIoY+2iuX+8Zf70VMYMkdo jyAGsOAeT0G5VEzTJUbZb/gScZHFlnwwrw53FL5P5rWCgG1TDhYeU3Z3tRskhwXuOf VsVscJrP12wQRkvkudLZGgs6dvIJCzerM/8oR1mB/fpn6FfyzM0fQC3xGW29625QZc e0a5oBgcGuJyw== Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 17:46:52 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: heng guo Cc: David Ahern , Vitezslav Samel , netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [6.6.x REGRESSION][BISECTED] dev_snmp6: broken Ip6OutOctets accounting for forwarded IPv6 packets Message-ID: <20240124174652.670af8d9@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <493d90b0-53f8-487e-8e0f-49f1dce65d58@windriver.com> References: <20240124123006.26bad16c@kernel.org> <61d1b53f-2879-4f9f-bd68-01333a892c02@gmail.com> <493d90b0-53f8-487e-8e0f-49f1dce65d58@windriver.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 25 Jan 2024 08:37:11 +0800 heng guo wrote: > >> Heng Guo, David, any thoughts on this? Revert? > > Revert is best; Heng Guo can revisit the math and try again. > > > > The patch in question basically negated IPSTATS_MIB_OUTOCTETS; I see it > > shown in proc but never bumped in the datapath. > [HG]: Yes please revert it. I verified the patch on ipv4, seems I should > not touch the codes to ipv6. Sorry for it. Would you mind sending a patch with a revert, explaining the situation, the right Fixes tag and a link to Vitezslav's report?