All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org
Cc: andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, martin.lau@linux.dev,
	yonghong.song@linux.dev, mykolal@fb.com,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, mat.gienieczko@tum.de,
	Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 6.6.y 08/17] selftests/bpf: track tcp payload offset as scalar in xdp_synproxy
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 02:15:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240125001554.25287-9-eddyz87@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240125001554.25287-1-eddyz87@gmail.com>

[ Upstream commit 977bc146d4eb ]

This change prepares syncookie_{tc,xdp} for update in callbakcs
verification logic. To allow bpf_loop() verification converge when
multiple callback itreations are considered:
- track offset inside TCP payload explicitly, not as a part of the
  pointer;
- make sure that offset does not exceed MAX_PACKET_OFF enforced by
  verifier;
- make sure that offset is tracked as unbound scalar between
  iterations, otherwise verifier won't be able infer that bpf_loop
  callback reaches identical states.

Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231121020701.26440-2-eddyz87@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_synproxy_kern.c   | 84 ++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_synproxy_kern.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_synproxy_kern.c
index 07d786329105..614b8ae2c144 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_synproxy_kern.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_synproxy_kern.c
@@ -53,6 +53,8 @@
 #define DEFAULT_TTL 64
 #define MAX_ALLOWED_PORTS 8
 
+#define MAX_PACKET_OFF 0xffff
+
 #define swap(a, b) \
 	do { typeof(a) __tmp = (a); (a) = (b); (b) = __tmp; } while (0)
 
@@ -183,63 +185,76 @@ static __always_inline __u32 tcp_time_stamp_raw(void)
 }
 
 struct tcpopt_context {
-	__u8 *ptr;
-	__u8 *end;
+	void *data;
 	void *data_end;
 	__be32 *tsecr;
 	__u8 wscale;
 	bool option_timestamp;
 	bool option_sack;
+	__u32 off;
 };
 
-static int tscookie_tcpopt_parse(struct tcpopt_context *ctx)
+static __always_inline u8 *next(struct tcpopt_context *ctx, __u32 sz)
 {
-	__u8 opcode, opsize;
+	__u64 off = ctx->off;
+	__u8 *data;
 
-	if (ctx->ptr >= ctx->end)
-		return 1;
-	if (ctx->ptr >= ctx->data_end)
-		return 1;
+	/* Verifier forbids access to packet when offset exceeds MAX_PACKET_OFF */
+	if (off > MAX_PACKET_OFF - sz)
+		return NULL;
 
-	opcode = ctx->ptr[0];
+	data = ctx->data + off;
+	barrier_var(data);
+	if (data + sz >= ctx->data_end)
+		return NULL;
 
-	if (opcode == TCPOPT_EOL)
-		return 1;
-	if (opcode == TCPOPT_NOP) {
-		++ctx->ptr;
-		return 0;
-	}
+	ctx->off += sz;
+	return data;
+}
 
-	if (ctx->ptr + 1 >= ctx->end)
-		return 1;
-	if (ctx->ptr + 1 >= ctx->data_end)
+static int tscookie_tcpopt_parse(struct tcpopt_context *ctx)
+{
+	__u8 *opcode, *opsize, *wscale, *tsecr;
+	__u32 off = ctx->off;
+
+	opcode = next(ctx, 1);
+	if (!opcode)
 		return 1;
-	opsize = ctx->ptr[1];
-	if (opsize < 2)
+
+	if (*opcode == TCPOPT_EOL)
 		return 1;
+	if (*opcode == TCPOPT_NOP)
+		return 0;
 
-	if (ctx->ptr + opsize > ctx->end)
+	opsize = next(ctx, 1);
+	if (!opsize || *opsize < 2)
 		return 1;
 
-	switch (opcode) {
+	switch (*opcode) {
 	case TCPOPT_WINDOW:
-		if (opsize == TCPOLEN_WINDOW && ctx->ptr + TCPOLEN_WINDOW <= ctx->data_end)
-			ctx->wscale = ctx->ptr[2] < TCP_MAX_WSCALE ? ctx->ptr[2] : TCP_MAX_WSCALE;
+		wscale = next(ctx, 1);
+		if (!wscale)
+			return 1;
+		if (*opsize == TCPOLEN_WINDOW)
+			ctx->wscale = *wscale < TCP_MAX_WSCALE ? *wscale : TCP_MAX_WSCALE;
 		break;
 	case TCPOPT_TIMESTAMP:
-		if (opsize == TCPOLEN_TIMESTAMP && ctx->ptr + TCPOLEN_TIMESTAMP <= ctx->data_end) {
+		tsecr = next(ctx, 4);
+		if (!tsecr)
+			return 1;
+		if (*opsize == TCPOLEN_TIMESTAMP) {
 			ctx->option_timestamp = true;
 			/* Client's tsval becomes our tsecr. */
-			*ctx->tsecr = get_unaligned((__be32 *)(ctx->ptr + 2));
+			*ctx->tsecr = get_unaligned((__be32 *)tsecr);
 		}
 		break;
 	case TCPOPT_SACK_PERM:
-		if (opsize == TCPOLEN_SACK_PERM)
+		if (*opsize == TCPOLEN_SACK_PERM)
 			ctx->option_sack = true;
 		break;
 	}
 
-	ctx->ptr += opsize;
+	ctx->off = off + *opsize;
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -256,16 +271,21 @@ static int tscookie_tcpopt_parse_batch(__u32 index, void *context)
 
 static __always_inline bool tscookie_init(struct tcphdr *tcp_header,
 					  __u16 tcp_len, __be32 *tsval,
-					  __be32 *tsecr, void *data_end)
+					  __be32 *tsecr, void *data, void *data_end)
 {
 	struct tcpopt_context loop_ctx = {
-		.ptr = (__u8 *)(tcp_header + 1),
-		.end = (__u8 *)tcp_header + tcp_len,
+		.data = data,
 		.data_end = data_end,
 		.tsecr = tsecr,
 		.wscale = TS_OPT_WSCALE_MASK,
 		.option_timestamp = false,
 		.option_sack = false,
+		/* Note: currently verifier would track .off as unbound scalar.
+		 *       In case if verifier would at some point get smarter and
+		 *       compute bounded value for this var, beware that it might
+		 *       hinder bpf_loop() convergence validation.
+		 */
+		.off = (__u8 *)(tcp_header + 1) - (__u8 *)data,
 	};
 	u32 cookie;
 
@@ -635,7 +655,7 @@ static __always_inline int syncookie_handle_syn(struct header_pointers *hdr,
 	cookie = (__u32)value;
 
 	if (tscookie_init((void *)hdr->tcp, hdr->tcp_len,
-			  &tsopt_buf[0], &tsopt_buf[1], data_end))
+			  &tsopt_buf[0], &tsopt_buf[1], data, data_end))
 		tsopt = tsopt_buf;
 
 	/* Check that there is enough space for a SYNACK. It also covers
-- 
2.43.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-01-25  0:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-25  0:15 [PATCH 6.6.y 00/17] bpf: backport of iterator and callback handling fixes Eduard Zingerman
2024-01-25  0:15 ` [PATCH 6.6.y 01/17] bpf: move explored_state() closer to the beginning of verifier.c Eduard Zingerman
2024-01-25  0:15 ` [PATCH 6.6.y 02/17] bpf: extract same_callsites() as utility function Eduard Zingerman
2024-01-25  0:15 ` [PATCH 6.6.y 03/17] bpf: exact states comparison for iterator convergence checks Eduard Zingerman
2024-01-25  0:15 ` [PATCH 6.6.y 04/17] selftests/bpf: tests with delayed read/precision makrs in loop body Eduard Zingerman
2024-01-25  0:15 ` [PATCH 6.6.y 05/17] bpf: correct loop detection for iterators convergence Eduard Zingerman
2024-01-25  0:15 ` [PATCH 6.6.y 06/17] selftests/bpf: test if state loops are detected in a tricky case Eduard Zingerman
2024-01-25  0:15 ` [PATCH 6.6.y 07/17] bpf: print full verifier states on infinite loop detection Eduard Zingerman
2024-01-25  0:15 ` Eduard Zingerman [this message]
2024-01-25  0:15 ` [PATCH 6.6.y 09/17] selftests/bpf: track string payload offset as scalar in strobemeta Eduard Zingerman
2024-01-25  0:15 ` [PATCH 6.6.y 10/17] bpf: extract __check_reg_arg() utility function Eduard Zingerman
2024-01-25  0:15 ` [PATCH 6.6.y 11/17] bpf: extract setup_func_entry() " Eduard Zingerman
2024-01-25  0:15 ` [PATCH 6.6.y 12/17] bpf: verify callbacks as if they are called unknown number of times Eduard Zingerman
2024-01-25  0:15 ` [PATCH 6.6.y 13/17] selftests/bpf: tests for iterating callbacks Eduard Zingerman
2024-01-25  0:15 ` [PATCH 6.6.y 14/17] bpf: widening for callback iterators Eduard Zingerman
2024-01-25  0:15 ` [PATCH 6.6.y 15/17] selftests/bpf: test widening for iterating callbacks Eduard Zingerman
2024-01-25  0:15 ` [PATCH 6.6.y 16/17] bpf: keep track of max number of bpf_loop callback iterations Eduard Zingerman
2024-01-25  0:15 ` [PATCH 6.6.y 17/17] selftests/bpf: check if max number of bpf_loop iterations is tracked Eduard Zingerman
2024-01-27  1:13 ` [PATCH 6.6.y 00/17] bpf: backport of iterator and callback handling fixes Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240125001554.25287-9-eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --to=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=mat.gienieczko@tum.de \
    --cc=mykolal@fb.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.