From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87A0CC48285 for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2024 09:53:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id D13163CE1D1 for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2024 10:53:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from in-7.smtp.seeweb.it (in-7.smtp.seeweb.it [IPv6:2001:4b78:1:20::7]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94BAE3C8B4B for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2024 10:53:33 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: in-7.smtp.seeweb.it; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=suse.cz (client-ip=195.135.223.130; helo=smtp-out1.suse.de; envelope-from=pvorel@suse.cz; receiver=lists.linux.it) Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [195.135.223.130]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-7.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22F3A256FEE for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2024 10:53:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org [10.150.64.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 218FA21ED1; Thu, 25 Jan 2024 09:53:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1706176410; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ceDYl0nxU85aDl2gZ2PZzDE/+UadL8wYdgdOuZo9iOc=; b=q6Oy8ouEpMbCE7IAZ+NwvkA5Ks2QCwgvYzbr3VuqywTc/iEd2kTLSky8AZFULQfauUUsvQ AWA6PYD2z5MctIkyyjHdpLwUswGwimD0syQqnZUd6jwX60FKDl2WbOTXbo8RIZe3/g0ViD 6Gn85CqAGankqT6Vgku2q9aWYQQEmvU= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1706176410; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ceDYl0nxU85aDl2gZ2PZzDE/+UadL8wYdgdOuZo9iOc=; b=IRyhRnR83KqCz3HDHXXWRO7TN95uSKbJMpY0PQ9V7Nm/vIBMzLpvcLiyUfXWjDMhE4n6Fr 6KsPdAm5pF4uh2Dw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1706176410; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ceDYl0nxU85aDl2gZ2PZzDE/+UadL8wYdgdOuZo9iOc=; b=q6Oy8ouEpMbCE7IAZ+NwvkA5Ks2QCwgvYzbr3VuqywTc/iEd2kTLSky8AZFULQfauUUsvQ AWA6PYD2z5MctIkyyjHdpLwUswGwimD0syQqnZUd6jwX60FKDl2WbOTXbo8RIZe3/g0ViD 6Gn85CqAGankqT6Vgku2q9aWYQQEmvU= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1706176410; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ceDYl0nxU85aDl2gZ2PZzDE/+UadL8wYdgdOuZo9iOc=; b=IRyhRnR83KqCz3HDHXXWRO7TN95uSKbJMpY0PQ9V7Nm/vIBMzLpvcLiyUfXWjDMhE4n6Fr 6KsPdAm5pF4uh2Dw== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EEA8E13649; Thu, 25 Jan 2024 09:53:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([10.150.64.162]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id NBYLOJkvsmVrWgAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Thu, 25 Jan 2024 09:53:29 +0000 Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 10:53:24 +0100 From: Petr Vorel To: Martin Doucha Message-ID: <20240125095324.GA385509@pevik> References: <20240125004732.9549-1-wegao@suse.com> <20240125093554.GA383352@pevik> <44e16062-1336-45fb-be72-6cbba0ba5e3c@suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <44e16062-1336-45fb-be72-6cbba0ba5e3c@suse.cz> Authentication-Results: smtp-out1.suse.de; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.52 / 50.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.30)[pvorel@suse.cz]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; FUZZY_BLOCKED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; BAYES_HAM(-0.02)[53.14%] X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.3 at in-7.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v1] fs_fill: Increase test loop device size to 1GB X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Petr Vorel Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" > On 25. 01. 24 10:35, Petr Vorel wrote: > > Hi Wei, > > > On PPC64 the page size is 64K and this causes trouble on btrfs > > nit: s/PPC64/ppc64le/ (the other one is 32 bit) > The other one is 64bit but big-endian. And yes, the big-endian mode will > have the same issue, so "PPC64" is good enough catch-all term. Wei, I'm sorry, of course Martin, you're right. > > nit: s/64K/4K/ > No. Also here. Martin, thanks for correcting me. Kind regards, Petr > > > filesystems of small size(LTP currently use 300M), the threads > > > could compete for a very small number of pages/blocks to actually > > > write the data. So Increase minimal device size to 1G avoid the > > > corner case. > > Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel > > I wonder if would work with less (512 MB), but probably better to be safe with > > 1024 MB. > > Kind regards, > > Petr -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp