From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Alessandro Marcolini <alessandromarcolini99@gmail.com>
Cc: jhs@mojatatu.com, xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com, jiri@resnulli.us,
davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next] taprio: validate TCA_TAPRIO_ATTR_FLAGS through policy instead of open-coding
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 21:14:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240126211441.GF401354@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240125165942.37920-1-alessandromarcolini99@gmail.com>
On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 05:59:42PM +0100, Alessandro Marcolini wrote:
> As of now, the field TCA_TAPRIO_ATTR_FLAGS is being validated by manually
> checking its value, using the function taprio_flags_valid().
>
> With this patch, the field will be validated through the netlink policy
> NLA_POLICY_MASK, where the mask is defined by TAPRIO_SUPPORTED_FLAGS.
> The mutual exclusivity of the two flags TCA_TAPRIO_ATTR_FLAG_FULL_OFFLOAD
> and TCA_TAPRIO_ATTR_FLAG_TXTIME_ASSIST is still checked manually.
>
> Changes since RFC:
> - fixed reversed xmas tree
> - use NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD() for both invalid configuration
>
> Changes since v1:
> - Changed NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD to NL_SET_ERR_MSG_ATTR when wrong flags
> issued
> - Changed __u32 to u32
>
> Changes since v2:
> - Added the missing parameter for NL_SET_ERR_MSG_ATTR (sorry again for
> the noise)
>
> Signed-off-by: Alessandro Marcolini <alessandromarcolini99@gmail.com>
> ---
Thanks for the updates.
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
For reference, and I don't think it's probably not
necessary to repost because of this, these days
it is normal to put the Changes below the scissors (---).
This means they don't end up in the git history.
But now we have lore that seems to be less of an issue.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-26 21:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-25 16:59 [PATCH v3 net-next] taprio: validate TCA_TAPRIO_ATTR_FLAGS through policy instead of open-coding Alessandro Marcolini
2024-01-26 21:14 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2024-01-28 16:13 ` Alessandro Marcolini
2024-01-29 12:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240126211441.GF401354@kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=alessandromarcolini99@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.