From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: dchinner@redhat.com,chandanbabu@kernel.org,hch@lst.de
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] xfs: read only mounts with fsopen mount API are busted" failed to apply to 5.10-stable tree
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2024 14:06:36 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2024012736-provable-risotto-2228@gregkh> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 5.10-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.10.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x d8d222e09dab84a17bb65dda4b94d01c565f5327
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2024012736-provable-risotto-2228@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.10.y' HEAD^..
Possible dependencies:
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From d8d222e09dab84a17bb65dda4b94d01c565f5327 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 15:33:07 +1100
Subject: [PATCH] xfs: read only mounts with fsopen mount API are busted
Recently xfs/513 started failing on my test machines testing "-o
ro,norecovery" mount options. This was being emitted in dmesg:
[ 9906.932724] XFS (pmem0): no-recovery mounts must be read-only.
Turns out, readonly mounts with the fsopen()/fsconfig() mount API
have been busted since day zero. It's only taken 5 years for debian
unstable to start using this "new" mount API, and shortly after this
I noticed xfs/513 had started to fail as per above.
The syscall trace is:
fsopen("xfs", FSOPEN_CLOEXEC) = 3
mount_setattr(-1, NULL, 0, NULL, 0) = -1 EINVAL (Invalid argument)
.....
fsconfig(3, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "source", "/dev/pmem0", 0) = 0
fsconfig(3, FSCONFIG_SET_FLAG, "ro", NULL, 0) = 0
fsconfig(3, FSCONFIG_SET_FLAG, "norecovery", NULL, 0) = 0
fsconfig(3, FSCONFIG_CMD_CREATE, NULL, NULL, 0) = -1 EINVAL (Invalid argument)
close(3) = 0
Showing that the actual mount instantiation (FSCONFIG_CMD_CREATE) is
what threw out the error.
During mount instantiation, we call xfs_fs_validate_params() which
does:
/* No recovery flag requires a read-only mount */
if (xfs_has_norecovery(mp) && !xfs_is_readonly(mp)) {
xfs_warn(mp, "no-recovery mounts must be read-only.");
return -EINVAL;
}
and xfs_is_readonly() checks internal mount flags for read only
state. This state is set in xfs_init_fs_context() from the
context superblock flag state:
/*
* Copy binary VFS mount flags we are interested in.
*/
if (fc->sb_flags & SB_RDONLY)
set_bit(XFS_OPSTATE_READONLY, &mp->m_opstate);
With the old mount API, all of the VFS specific superblock flags
had already been parsed and set before xfs_init_fs_context() is
called, so this all works fine.
However, in the brave new fsopen/fsconfig world,
xfs_init_fs_context() is called from fsopen() context, before any
VFS superblock have been set or parsed. Hence if we use fsopen(),
the internal XFS readonly state is *never set*. Hence anything that
depends on xfs_is_readonly() actually returning true for read only
mounts is broken if fsopen() has been used to mount the filesystem.
Fix this by moving this internal state initialisation to
xfs_fs_fill_super() before we attempt to validate the parameters
that have been set prior to the FSCONFIG_CMD_CREATE call being made.
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Fixes: 73e5fff98b64 ("xfs: switch to use the new mount-api")
cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Chandan Babu R <chandanbabu@kernel.org>
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
index aff20ddd4a9f..5a2512d20bd0 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
@@ -1496,6 +1496,18 @@ xfs_fs_fill_super(
mp->m_super = sb;
+ /*
+ * Copy VFS mount flags from the context now that all parameter parsing
+ * is guaranteed to have been completed by either the old mount API or
+ * the newer fsopen/fsconfig API.
+ */
+ if (fc->sb_flags & SB_RDONLY)
+ set_bit(XFS_OPSTATE_READONLY, &mp->m_opstate);
+ if (fc->sb_flags & SB_DIRSYNC)
+ mp->m_features |= XFS_FEAT_DIRSYNC;
+ if (fc->sb_flags & SB_SYNCHRONOUS)
+ mp->m_features |= XFS_FEAT_WSYNC;
+
error = xfs_fs_validate_params(mp);
if (error)
return error;
@@ -1965,6 +1977,11 @@ static const struct fs_context_operations xfs_context_ops = {
.free = xfs_fs_free,
};
+/*
+ * WARNING: do not initialise any parameters in this function that depend on
+ * mount option parsing having already been performed as this can be called from
+ * fsopen() before any parameters have been set.
+ */
static int xfs_init_fs_context(
struct fs_context *fc)
{
@@ -1996,16 +2013,6 @@ static int xfs_init_fs_context(
mp->m_logbsize = -1;
mp->m_allocsize_log = 16; /* 64k */
- /*
- * Copy binary VFS mount flags we are interested in.
- */
- if (fc->sb_flags & SB_RDONLY)
- set_bit(XFS_OPSTATE_READONLY, &mp->m_opstate);
- if (fc->sb_flags & SB_DIRSYNC)
- mp->m_features |= XFS_FEAT_DIRSYNC;
- if (fc->sb_flags & SB_SYNCHRONOUS)
- mp->m_features |= XFS_FEAT_WSYNC;
-
fc->s_fs_info = mp;
fc->ops = &xfs_context_ops;
reply other threads:[~2024-01-27 22:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2024012736-provable-risotto-2228@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=chandanbabu@kernel.org \
--cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.