From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: David Wei <dw@davidwei.uk>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v7 1/4] netdevsim: allow two netdevsim ports to be connected
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2024 06:48:51 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202401280644.lnmk82jI-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240127040354.944744-2-dw@davidwei.uk>
Hi David,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on net-next/main]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/David-Wei/netdevsim-allow-two-netdevsim-ports-to-be-connected/20240127-121234
base: net-next/main
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240127040354.944744-2-dw%40davidwei.uk
patch subject: [PATCH net-next v7 1/4] netdevsim: allow two netdevsim ports to be connected
config: x86_64-randconfig-r122-20240127 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240128/202401280644.lnmk82jI-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-9 (Debian 9.3.0-22) 9.3.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240128/202401280644.lnmk82jI-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202401280644.lnmk82jI-lkp@intel.com/
sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>> drivers/net/netdevsim/bus.c:349:14: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different address spaces) @@ expected struct netdevsim *peer @@ got struct netdevsim [noderef] __rcu *peer @@
drivers/net/netdevsim/bus.c:349:14: sparse: expected struct netdevsim *peer
drivers/net/netdevsim/bus.c:349:14: sparse: got struct netdevsim [noderef] __rcu *peer
vim +349 drivers/net/netdevsim/bus.c
311
312 static ssize_t unlink_device_store(const struct bus_type *bus, const char *buf, size_t count)
313 {
314 struct netdevsim *nsim, *peer;
315 unsigned int netnsid, ifidx;
316 struct net_device *dev;
317 struct net *ns;
318 int err;
319
320 err = sscanf(buf, "%u:%u", &netnsid, &ifidx);
321 if (err != 2) {
322 pr_err("Format for unlinking a device is \"netnsid:ifidx\" (uint uint).\n");
323 return -EINVAL;
324 }
325
326 err = -EINVAL;
327 rtnl_lock();
328 ns = get_net_ns_by_id(current->nsproxy->net_ns, netnsid);
329 if (!ns) {
330 pr_err("Could not find netns with id: %u\n", netnsid);
331 goto out_unlock_rtnl;
332 }
333
334 dev = __dev_get_by_index(ns, ifidx);
335 if (!dev) {
336 pr_err("Could not find device with ifindex %u in netnsid %u\n", ifidx, netnsid);
337 goto out_put_netns;
338 }
339
340 if (!netdev_is_nsim(dev)) {
341 pr_err("Device with ifindex %u in netnsid %u is not a netdevsim\n", ifidx, netnsid);
342 goto out_put_netns;
343 }
344
345 err = 0;
346 nsim = netdev_priv(dev);
347 if (!nsim->peer)
348 goto out_put_netns;
> 349 peer = nsim->peer;
350
351 RCU_INIT_POINTER(nsim->peer, NULL);
352 RCU_INIT_POINTER(peer->peer, NULL);
353
354 out_put_netns:
355 put_net(ns);
356 out_unlock_rtnl:
357 rtnl_unlock();
358
359 return !err ? count : err;
360 }
361 static BUS_ATTR_WO(unlink_device);
362
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-27 22:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-27 4:03 [PATCH net-next v7 0/4] netdevsim: link and forward skbs between ports David Wei
2024-01-27 4:03 ` [PATCH net-next v7 1/4] netdevsim: allow two netdevsim ports to be connected David Wei
2024-01-27 22:48 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2024-01-27 4:03 ` [PATCH net-next v7 2/4] netdevsim: forward skbs from one connected port to another David Wei
2024-01-27 4:03 ` [PATCH net-next v7 3/4] netdevsim: add selftest for forwarding skb between connected ports David Wei
2024-01-29 20:34 ` Simon Horman
2024-01-30 18:57 ` David Wei
2024-02-02 10:22 ` Simon Horman
2024-01-27 4:03 ` [PATCH net-next v7 4/4] netdevsim: add Makefile for selftests David Wei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202401280644.lnmk82jI-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=dw@davidwei.uk \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sd@queasysnail.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.