All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Cc: Erick Archer <erick.archer@gmx.com>,
	Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>,
	Jeffrey Hugo <quic_jhugo@quicinc.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, mhi@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bus: mhi: ep: Use kcalloc() instead of kzalloc()
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 14:04:38 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240130083438.GM32821@thinkpad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43614a09-d520-4111-873a-b352bd93ea07@moroto.mountain>

On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 10:15:20AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> This code does not have an integer overflow, but it might have a
> different memory corruption bug.
> 
> On Sat, Jan 20, 2024 at 04:25:18PM +0100, Erick Archer wrote:
> > As noted in the "Deprecated Interfaces, Language Features, Attributes,
> > and Conventions" documentation [1], size calculations (especially
> > multiplication) should not be performed in memory allocator (or similar)
> > function arguments due to the risk of them overflowing. This could lead
> > to values wrapping around and a smaller allocation being made than the
> > caller was expecting. Using those allocations could lead to linear
> > overflows of heap memory and other misbehaviors.
> > 
> > So, use the purpose specific kcalloc() function instead of the argument
> > count * size in the kzalloc() function.
> > 
> 
> This one is more complicated to analyze.  I have built a Smatch cross
> function database so it's easy for me and I will help you.
> 
> $ smbd.py where mhi_ep_cntrl event_rings
> drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-mhi.c | pci_epf_mhi_probe              | (struct mhi_ep_cntrl)->event_rings | 0
> drivers/bus/mhi/ep/main.c      | mhi_ep_irq                     | (struct mhi_ep_cntrl)->event_rings | min-max
> drivers/bus/mhi/ep/mmio.c      | mhi_ep_mmio_init               | (struct mhi_ep_cntrl)->event_rings | 0-255
> drivers/bus/mhi/ep/mmio.c      | mhi_ep_mmio_update_ner         | (struct mhi_ep_cntrl)->event_rings | 0-255
> 
> The other way to figure this stuff out would be to do:
> 
> $ grep -Rn "event_rings = " drivers/bus/mhi/ep/
> drivers/bus/mhi/ep/mmio.c:260:  mhi_cntrl->event_rings = FIELD_GET(MHICFG_NER_MASK, regval);
> drivers/bus/mhi/ep/mmio.c:261:  mhi_cntrl->hw_event_rings = FIELD_GET(MHICFG_NHWER_MASK, regval);
> drivers/bus/mhi/ep/mmio.c:271:  mhi_cntrl->event_rings = FIELD_GET(MHICFG_NER_MASK, regval);
> drivers/bus/mhi/ep/mmio.c:272:  mhi_cntrl->hw_event_rings = FIELD_GET(MHICFG_NHWER_MASK, regval);
> 
> That means that this multiplication can never overflow so the patch
> has no effect on runtime.  The patch is still useful because we don't
> want every single person to have to do this analysis.  The kcalloc()
> function is just safer and more obviously correct.
> 

Agree.

> It's a bit concerning that ->event_rings is set multiple times, but only
> allocated one time.  It's either unnecessary or there is a potential
> memory corruption bug.  If it's really necessary then there should be a
> check that the new size is <= the size of the original buffer that we
> allocated.

Agree, the dual assignment could be avoided. I added it initially to have all
the memory allocations in one place, and also there is a guarantee from the spec
that the MHICFG_NER_MASK will always be initialized to hw max value.

But looking at it again, it seems redundant. So I will drop the assignment from
mhi_ep_mmio_init().

Thanks for spotting!

- Mani

-- 
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-01-30  8:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-20 15:25 [PATCH] bus: mhi: ep: Use kcalloc() instead of kzalloc() Erick Archer
2024-01-22  7:15 ` Dan Carpenter
2024-01-28 10:29   ` Erick Archer
2024-01-29  5:20     ` Dan Carpenter
2024-02-02 17:48       ` Erick Archer
2024-01-30  8:34   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam [this message]
2024-01-22 17:50 ` Gustavo A. R. Silva

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240130083438.GM32821@thinkpad \
    --to=mani@kernel.org \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
    --cc=erick.archer@gmx.com \
    --cc=error27@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
    --cc=mhi@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=quic_jhugo@quicinc.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.