From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Jian-Hong Pan <jhp@endlessos.org>
Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
David Box <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>,
Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>,
Nirmal Patel <nirmal.patel@linux.intel.com>,
Jonathan Derrick <jonathan.derrick@linux.dev>,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux@endlessos.org,
Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] PCI: vmd: enable PCI PM's L1 substates of remapped PCIe port and NVMe
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 11:28:01 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240130172801.GA525128@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240130163519.GA521777@bhelgaas>
[+cc Johan since qcom has similar code]
On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 10:35:19AM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 06:00:51PM +0800, Jian-Hong Pan wrote:
> > The remmapped PCIe port and NVMe have PCI PM L1 substates capability on
> > ASUS B1400CEAE, but they are disabled originally:
> >
> > Capabilities: [900 v1] L1 PM Substates
> > L1SubCap: PCI-PM_L1.2+ PCI-PM_L1.1- ASPM_L1.2+ ASPM_L1.1- L1_PM_Substates+
> > PortCommonModeRestoreTime=32us PortTPowerOnTime=10us
> > L1SubCtl1: PCI-PM_L1.2- PCI-PM_L1.1- ASPM_L1.2+ ASPM_L1.1-
> > T_CommonMode=0us LTR1.2_Threshold=0ns
> > L1SubCtl2: T_PwrOn=10us
> >
> > Power on all of the VMD remapped PCI devices before enable PCI-PM L1 PM
> > Substates by following "Section 5.5.4 of PCIe Base Spec Revision 5.0
> > Version 0.1". Then, PCI PM's L1 substates control are enabled
> > accordingly.
> >
> > Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218394
> > Signed-off-by: Jian-Hong Pan <jhp@endlessos.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c b/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c
> > index 87b7856f375a..b1bbe8e6075a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c
> > @@ -738,6 +738,12 @@ static void vmd_copy_host_bridge_flags(struct pci_host_bridge *root_bridge,
> > vmd_bridge->native_dpc = root_bridge->native_dpc;
> > }
> >
> > +static int vmd_power_on_pci_device(struct pci_dev *pdev, void *userdata)
> > +{
> > + pci_set_power_state(pdev, PCI_D0);
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > /*
> > * Enable ASPM and LTR settings on devices that aren't configured by BIOS.
> > */
> > @@ -928,6 +934,13 @@ static int vmd_enable_domain(struct vmd_dev *vmd, unsigned long features)
> > vmd_acpi_begin();
> >
> > pci_scan_child_bus(vmd->bus);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Make PCI devices at D0 when enable PCI-PM L1 PM Substates from
> > + * Section 5.5.4 of PCIe Base Spec Revision 5.0 Version 0.1
> > + */
> > + pci_walk_bus(vmd->bus, vmd_power_on_pci_device, NULL);
>
> Sec 5.5.4 indeed says "If setting either or both of the enable bits
> for PCI-PM L1 PM Substates, both ports must be configured ... while in
> D0."
>
> This applies to *all* PCIe devices, not just those below a VMD bridge,
> so I'm not sure this is the right place to do this. Is there anything
> that prevents a similar issue for non-VMD hierarchies?
>
> I guess the bridges (Root Ports and Switch Ports) must already be in
> D0, or we wouldn't be able to enumerate anything below them, right?
>
> It would be nice to connect this more closely with the L1 PM Substates
> configuration. I don't quite see the connection here. The only path
> I see for L1SS configuration is this:
>
> pci_scan_slot
> pcie_aspm_init_link_state
> pcie_aspm_cap_init
> aspm_l1ss_init
>
> which of course is inside pci_scan_child_bus(), which happens *before*
> this patch puts the devices in D0. Where does the L1SS configuration
> happen after this vmd_power_on_pci_device()?
I think I found it; a more complete call tree is like this, where the
L1SS configuration is inside the pci_enable_link_state_locked() done
by the vmd_pm_enable_quirk() bus walk:
vmd_enable_domain
pci_scan_child_bus
...
pci_scan_slot
pcie_aspm_init_link_state
pcie_aspm_cap_init
aspm_l1ss_init
+ pci_walk_bus(vmd->bus, vmd_power_on_pci_device, NULL)
...
pci_walk_bus(vmd->bus, vmd_pm_enable_quirk, &features)
vmd_pm_enable_quirk
pci_enable_link_state_locked(PCIE_LINK_STATE_ALL)
__pci_enable_link_state
link->aspm_default |= ...
pcie_config_aspm_link
pcie_config_aspm_l1ss
pci_clear_and_set_config_dword(PCI_L1SS_CTL1) # <--
pcie_config_aspm_dev
pcie_capability_clear_and_set_word(PCI_EXP_LNKCTL)
qcom_pcie_enable_aspm() does a similar pci_set_power_state(PCI_D0)
before calling pci_enable_link_state_locked(). I would prefer to
avoid the D0 precondition, but at the very least, I think we should
add a note to the pci_enable_link_state_locked() kernel-doc saying the
caller must ensure the device is in D0.
I think vmd_pm_enable_quirk() is also problematic because it
configures the LTR Capability *after* calling
pci_enable_link_state_locked(PCIE_LINK_STATE_ALL).
The pci_enable_link_state_locked() will enable ASPM L1.2, but sec
5.5.4 says LTR_L1.2_THRESHOLD must be programmed *before* ASPM L1.2
Enable is set.
Bjorn
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-30 17:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-30 10:00 [PATCH 2/2] PCI: vmd: enable PCI PM's L1 substates of remapped PCIe port and NVMe Jian-Hong Pan
2024-01-30 16:35 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-01-30 17:28 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2024-01-31 7:37 ` Jian-Hong Pan
2024-01-31 8:33 ` Johan Hovold
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240130172801.GA525128@bhelgaas \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=cassel@kernel.org \
--cc=david.e.box@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=jhp@endlessos.org \
--cc=johan+linaro@kernel.org \
--cc=jonathan.derrick@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@endlessos.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=nirmal.patel@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.