All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] eventfs: clean up dentry ops and add revalidate function
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 01:12:46 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240131011246.GP2087318@ZenIV> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240130190355.11486-6-torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 11:03:55AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:

> +void eventfs_d_release(struct dentry *dentry)
>  {
> -	struct eventfs_inode *ei;
> -
> -	mutex_lock(&eventfs_mutex);
> -	ei = dentry->d_fsdata;
> -	if (ei) {
> -		dentry->d_fsdata = NULL;
> -		put_ei(ei);
> -	}
> -	mutex_unlock(&eventfs_mutex);
> +	put_ei(dentry->d_fsdata);
>  }

I'd rather pass ->d_fsdata to that sucker (or exposed put_ei(),
for that matter).

> @@ -857,6 +847,5 @@ void eventfs_remove_events_dir(struct eventfs_inode *ei)
>  	 * sticks around while the other ei->dentry are created
>  	 * and destroyed dynamically.
>  	 */
> -	simple_recursive_removal(dentry, NULL);

That also needs to move earlier in the series - bisect hazard.

> + *
> + * Note that d_revalidate is called potentially under RCU,
> + * so it can't take the eventfs mutex etc. It's fine - if
> + * we open a file just as it's marked dead, things will
> + * still work just fine, and just see the old stale case.

Looks like use after free, unless freeing ei is RCU-delayed...

> +	return !(ei && ei->is_freed);

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-01-31  1:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-30 19:03 [PATCH 1/6] tracefs: avoid using the ei->dentry pointer unnecessarily Linus Torvalds
2024-01-30 19:03 ` [PATCH 2/6] eventfsfs: initialize the tracefs inode properly Linus Torvalds
2024-01-30 19:48   ` Steven Rostedt
2024-01-30 19:56     ` Steven Rostedt
2024-01-30 19:49   ` Steven Rostedt
2024-01-30 19:03 ` [PATCH 3/6] tracefs: dentry lookup crapectomy Linus Torvalds
2024-01-30 23:26   ` Al Viro
2024-01-30 23:55     ` Steven Rostedt
2024-01-31  0:07       ` Al Viro
2024-01-31  0:23   ` Al Viro
2024-01-31  0:39     ` Linus Torvalds
2024-01-30 19:03 ` [PATCH 4/6] eventfs: remove unused 'd_parent' pointer field Linus Torvalds
2024-01-30 19:03 ` [PATCH 5/6] eventfs: get rid of dentry pointers without refcounts Linus Torvalds
2024-01-30 20:55   ` Steven Rostedt
2024-01-30 21:52     ` Linus Torvalds
2024-01-30 22:56       ` Steven Rostedt
2024-01-30 22:58         ` Linus Torvalds
2024-01-30 23:04           ` Steven Rostedt
2024-01-30 22:56       ` Linus Torvalds
2024-01-30 23:06         ` Linus Torvalds
2024-01-30 23:10           ` Steven Rostedt
2024-01-30 23:25             ` Linus Torvalds
2024-01-31  0:48   ` Al Viro
2024-01-31  5:09   ` Steven Rostedt
2024-01-31  5:25     ` Linus Torvalds
2024-01-31  5:33       ` Steven Rostedt
2024-01-31  5:57         ` Linus Torvalds
2024-01-31  6:20           ` Linus Torvalds
2024-01-31 12:57             ` Steven Rostedt
2024-01-31 13:14               ` Steven Rostedt
2024-01-31 18:08                 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-01-31 18:39                   ` Steven Rostedt
2024-01-30 19:03 ` [PATCH 6/6] eventfs: clean up dentry ops and add revalidate function Linus Torvalds
2024-01-30 21:25   ` Steven Rostedt
2024-01-30 21:36     ` Linus Torvalds
2024-01-31  1:12   ` Al Viro [this message]
2024-01-31  2:37     ` Linus Torvalds
2024-01-31  2:46       ` Al Viro
2024-01-31  3:39         ` Linus Torvalds
2024-01-31  4:28           ` Al Viro
2024-01-31 18:00   ` Steven Rostedt
2024-01-31 23:07     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2024-01-31 23:23       ` Steven Rostedt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240131011246.GP2087318@ZenIV \
    --to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.