All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Paul Durrant <paul@xen.org>
Cc: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Wei Liu <wl@xen.org>,
	"xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] xen-netback: properly sync TX responses
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 16:23:36 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240131162336.7d3ba09e@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <980c6c3d-e10e-4459-8565-e8fbde122f00@suse.com>

On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 14:03:08 +0100 Jan Beulich wrote:
> Invoking the make_tx_response() / push_tx_responses() pair with no lock
> held would be acceptable only if all such invocations happened from the
> same context (NAPI instance or dealloc thread). Since this isn't the
> case, and since the interface "spec" also doesn't demand that multicast
> operations may only be performed with no in-flight transmits,
> MCAST_{ADD,DEL} processing also needs to acquire the response lock
> around the invocations.
> 
> To prevent similar mistakes going forward, "downgrade" the present
> functions to private helpers of just the two remaining ones using them
> directly, with no forward declarations anymore. This involves renaming
> what so far was make_tx_response(), for the new function of that name
> to serve the new (wrapper) purpose.
> 
> While there,
> - constify the txp parameters,
> - correct xenvif_idx_release()'s status parameter's type,
> - rename {,_}make_tx_response()'s status parameters for consistency with
>   xenvif_idx_release()'s.

Hi Paul, is this one on your TODO list to review or should 
we do our best? :)
-- 
pw-bot: needs-ack


  reply	other threads:[~2024-02-01  0:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-29 13:03 [PATCH net] xen-netback: properly sync TX responses Jan Beulich
2024-02-01  0:23 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2024-02-01 15:43   ` Paul Durrant
2024-02-01 16:10 ` Paul Durrant
2024-02-01 16:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240131162336.7d3ba09e@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@xen.org \
    --cc=wl@xen.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.