From: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
To: Martin Doucha <mdoucha@suse.cz>
Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] waitpid04: Convert to new API
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 18:21:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240131172148.GA5570@pevik> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240131135026.1562-1-mdoucha@suse.cz>
> Convert waitpid() error state checks to new API, fix bugs in the original
> test and add ESRCH subtest.
Very nice cleanup.
Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
BTW what were these bugs? It looks like old test uses pid O for the first ECHILD
test (not sure how it got defined to 0).
> #include <sys/signal.h>
nit: this should be <signal.h>
warning: #warning redirecting incorrect #include <sys/signal.h> to <signal.h> [-Wcpp]
Can be fixed before merge.
> #include <sys/types.h>
> #include <sys/wait.h>
...
> +#include "tst_test.h"
> +
> +#define TCFMT "waipid(%d, NULL, 0x%x)"
> +#define TCFMTARGS(tc) (tc)->pid, (tc)->flags
checkpatch.pl complains:
waitpid04.c:19: ERROR: Macros with complex values should be enclosed in parentheses
I guess we can ignore this unless you see a quick fix (I guess macro which runs
tst_res() inside would be needed.
> +static struct testcase {
> + pid_t pid;
> + int flags;
> + int err;
> +} testcase_list[] = {
> + {-1, 0, ECHILD}, /* Wait for any child when none exist */
> + {1, 0, ECHILD}, /* Wait for non-child process */
> + {-1, -1, EINVAL}, /* Invalid flags */
> + {INT_MIN, 0, ESRCH}, /* Wait for invalid process group */
> +};
> +
> +void run(unsigned int n)
> {
...
> + const struct testcase *tc = testcase_list + n;
> - if (FORK_OR_VFORK() == 0)
> - exit(0);
> + TEST(waitpid(tc->pid, NULL, tc->flags));
How about using TST_EXP_FAIL2() to avoid code below? It would also help to avoid
macros, right? Or you want to explicitly state what failed?
Kind regards,
Petr
> + if (TST_RET == -1 && TST_ERR == tc->err) {
> + tst_res(TPASS | TTERRNO, TCFMT " failed as expected",
> + TCFMTARGS(tc));
> + return;
> + }
> + if (TST_RET == -1) {
> + tst_res(TFAIL | TTERRNO, TCFMT ": expected error %s, got",
> + TCFMTARGS(tc), tst_strerrno(tc->err));
> + return;
> }
> + if (TST_RET < 0) {
> + tst_res(TFAIL | TTERRNO, TCFMT ": invalid return value %ld",
> + TCFMTARGS(tc), TST_RET);
> + return;
> + }
> + tst_res(TFAIL, TCFMT " returned unexpected PID %ld", TCFMTARGS(tc),
> + TST_RET);
> }
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-31 17:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-31 13:50 [LTP] [PATCH] waitpid04: Convert to new API Martin Doucha
2024-01-31 17:21 ` Petr Vorel [this message]
2024-02-01 11:10 ` Martin Doucha
2024-02-01 11:51 ` Petr Vorel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240131172148.GA5570@pevik \
--to=pvorel@suse.cz \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
--cc=mdoucha@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.