From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
To: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
Cc: "Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
"Kishon Vijay Abraham I" <kishon@kernel.org>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Damien Le Moal" <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] PCI: endpoint: improve pci_epf_alloc_space()
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2024 14:10:23 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240202084023.GD2961@thinkpad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240130193214.713739-3-cassel@kernel.org>
On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 08:32:10PM +0100, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> pci_epf_alloc_space() already performs checks on the requested BAR size,
> and will allocate and set epf_bar->size to a size higher than the
> requested BAR size if some constraint deems it necessary.
>
> However, other than pci_epf_alloc_space() performing these roundups,
> there are checks and roundups in two different places in pci-epf-test.c.
>
> And further checks are proposed to other endpoint function drivers, see:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20240108151015.2030469-1-Frank.Li@nxp.com/
>
> Having these checks spread out at different places in the EPF driver
> (and potentially in multiple EPF drivers) is not maintainable and makes
> the code hard to follow.
>
> Since pci_epf_alloc_space() already performs roundups, move the checks and
> roundups performed by pci-epf-test.c to pci_epf_alloc_space().
>
> Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
Please move the epf-test change to patch 2. Rest LGTM.
- Mani
> ---
> drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c | 8 --------
> drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epf-core.c | 10 +++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
> index 15bfa7d83489..981894e40681 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
> @@ -841,12 +841,6 @@ static int pci_epf_test_alloc_space(struct pci_epf *epf)
> }
> test_reg_size = test_reg_bar_size + msix_table_size + pba_size;
>
> - if (epc_features->bar_fixed_size[test_reg_bar]) {
> - if (test_reg_size > bar_size[test_reg_bar])
> - return -ENOMEM;
> - test_reg_size = bar_size[test_reg_bar];
> - }
> -
> base = pci_epf_alloc_space(epf, test_reg_size, test_reg_bar,
> epc_features, PRIMARY_INTERFACE);
> if (!base) {
> @@ -888,8 +882,6 @@ static void pci_epf_configure_bar(struct pci_epf *epf,
> bar_fixed_64bit = !!(epc_features->bar_fixed_64bit & (1 << i));
> if (bar_fixed_64bit)
> epf_bar->flags |= PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64;
> - if (epc_features->bar_fixed_size[i])
> - bar_size[i] = epc_features->bar_fixed_size[i];
> }
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epf-core.c b/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epf-core.c
> index e44f4078fe8b..37d9651d2026 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epf-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epf-core.c
> @@ -260,6 +260,7 @@ void *pci_epf_alloc_space(struct pci_epf *epf, size_t size, enum pci_barno bar,
> const struct pci_epc_features *epc_features,
> enum pci_epc_interface_type type)
> {
> + u64 bar_fixed_size = epc_features->bar_fixed_size[bar];
> size_t align = epc_features->align;
> struct pci_epf_bar *epf_bar;
> dma_addr_t phys_addr;
> @@ -270,7 +271,14 @@ void *pci_epf_alloc_space(struct pci_epf *epf, size_t size, enum pci_barno bar,
> if (size < 128)
> size = 128;
>
> - if (align)
> + if (bar_fixed_size && size > bar_fixed_size) {
> + dev_err(dev, "requested BAR size is larger than fixed size\n");
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +
> + if (bar_fixed_size)
> + size = bar_fixed_size;
> + else if (align)
> size = ALIGN(size, align);
> else
> size = roundup_pow_of_two(size);
> --
> 2.43.0
>
>
--
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-02 8:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-30 19:32 [PATCH 0/3] pci_epf_alloc_space() cleanups Niklas Cassel
2024-01-30 19:32 ` [PATCH 1/3] PCI: endpoint: refactor pci_epf_alloc_space() Niklas Cassel
2024-01-30 19:45 ` Frank Li
2024-02-02 8:37 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2024-01-30 19:32 ` [PATCH 2/3] PCI: endpoint: improve pci_epf_alloc_space() Niklas Cassel
2024-01-30 19:50 ` Frank Li
2024-01-30 21:37 ` Niklas Cassel
2024-02-02 8:40 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam [this message]
2024-01-30 19:32 ` [PATCH 3/3] PCI: endpoint: pci-epf-vntb: remove superfluous checks Niklas Cassel
2024-01-30 19:51 ` Frank Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240202084023.GD2961@thinkpad \
--to=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=cassel@kernel.org \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=kishon@kernel.org \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.