From: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
To: Daniel Xu <dxu@dxuuu.xyz>
Cc: <oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev>, <lkp@intel.com>, <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-input@vger.kernel.org>, <fsverity@lists.linux.dev>,
<cgroups@vger.kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>, <coreteam@netfilter.org>,
<mhiramat@kernel.org>, <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
<edumazet@google.com>, <fw@strlen.de>, <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
<tytso@mit.edu>, <ast@kernel.org>, <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
<kuba@kernel.org>, <tj@kernel.org>,
<steffen.klassert@secunet.com>, <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
<hawk@kernel.org>, <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
<john.fastabend@gmail.com>, <pablo@netfilter.org>,
<pabeni@redhat.com>, <jikos@kernel.org>, <davem@davemloft.net>,
<alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>, <song@kernel.org>,
<dsahern@kernel.org>, <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
<corbet@lwn.net>, <lizefan.x@bytedance.com>, <andrii@kernel.org>,
<martin.lau@linux.dev>, <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>,
<ebiggers@kernel.org>, <kadlec@netfilter.org>, <shuah@kernel.org>,
<alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>, <olsajiri@gmail.com>,
<quentin@isovalent.com>, <alan.maguire@oracle.com>,
<memxor@gmail.com>, <kpsingh@kernel.org>, <sdf@google.com>,
<haoluo@google.com>, <jolsa@kernel.org>,
<mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>, <mykolal@fb.com>,
<linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 3/3] bpf: treewide: Annotate BPF kfuncs in BTF
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2024 10:41:30 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202402041610.775e7f75-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e55150ceecbf0a5d961e608941165c0bee7bc943.1706491398.git.dxu@dxuuu.xyz>
Hello,
kernel test robot noticed "WARNING:at_kernel/bpf/btf.c:#register_btf_kfunc_id_set" on:
commit: 918c4c7dda155568c619b4082fa83ca90ab578a6 ("[PATCH bpf-next v4 3/3] bpf: treewide: Annotate BPF kfuncs in BTF")
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Daniel-Xu/bpf-btf-Support-flags-for-BTF_SET8-sets/20240129-092732
base: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git master
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/e55150ceecbf0a5d961e608941165c0bee7bc943.1706491398.git.dxu@dxuuu.xyz/
patch subject: [PATCH bpf-next v4 3/3] bpf: treewide: Annotate BPF kfuncs in BTF
in testcase: boot
compiler: clang-17
test machine: qemu-system-x86_64 -enable-kvm -cpu SandyBridge -smp 2 -m 16G
(please refer to attached dmesg/kmsg for entire log/backtrace)
+-----------------------------------------------------------------+------------+------------+
| | 05221438c4 | 918c4c7dda |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------+------------+------------+
| WARNING:at_kernel/bpf/btf.c:#register_btf_kfunc_id_set | 0 | 7 |
| EIP:register_btf_kfunc_id_set | 0 | 7 |
| calltrace:do_softirq_own_stack | 0 | 7 |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------+------------+------------+
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202402041610.775e7f75-lkp@intel.com
[ 49.044594][ T1] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 49.045857][ T1] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 1 at kernel/bpf/btf.c:8048 register_btf_kfunc_id_set (??:?)
[ 49.048024][ T1] Modules linked in:
[ 49.048925][ T1] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G W 6.8.0-rc1-00457-g918c4c7dda15 #6
[ 49.051230][ T1] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.2-debian-1.16.2-1 04/01/2014
[ 49.053616][ T1] EIP: register_btf_kfunc_id_set (??:?)
[ 49.054969][ T1] Code: 04 01 75 0b b8 ea ff ff ff 83 3a 00 74 1c c3 b9 0d 00 00 00 83 f8 20 77 07 8b 0c 85 28 a2 71 d7 55 89 e5 e8 13 00 00 00 5d c3 <0f> 0b c3 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 55 89 e5 53 57
All code
========
0: 04 01 add $0x1,%al
2: 75 0b jne 0xf
4: b8 ea ff ff ff mov $0xffffffea,%eax
9: 83 3a 00 cmpl $0x0,(%rdx)
c: 74 1c je 0x2a
e: c3 retq
f: b9 0d 00 00 00 mov $0xd,%ecx
14: 83 f8 20 cmp $0x20,%eax
17: 77 07 ja 0x20
19: 8b 0c 85 28 a2 71 d7 mov -0x288e5dd8(,%rax,4),%ecx
20: 55 push %rbp
21: 89 e5 mov %esp,%ebp
23: e8 13 00 00 00 callq 0x3b
28: 5d pop %rbp
29: c3 retq
2a:* 0f 0b ud2 <-- trapping instruction
2c: c3 retq
2d: 90 nop
2e: 90 nop
2f: 90 nop
30: 90 nop
31: 90 nop
32: 90 nop
33: 90 nop
34: 90 nop
35: 90 nop
36: 90 nop
37: 90 nop
38: 90 nop
39: 90 nop
3a: 90 nop
3b: 55 push %rbp
3c: 89 e5 mov %esp,%ebp
3e: 53 push %rbx
3f: 57 push %rdi
Code starting with the faulting instruction
===========================================
0: 0f 0b ud2
2: c3 retq
3: 90 nop
4: 90 nop
5: 90 nop
6: 90 nop
7: 90 nop
8: 90 nop
9: 90 nop
a: 90 nop
b: 90 nop
c: 90 nop
d: 90 nop
e: 90 nop
f: 90 nop
10: 90 nop
11: 55 push %rbp
12: 89 e5 mov %esp,%ebp
14: 53 push %rbx
15: 57 push %rdi
[ 49.059550][ T1] EAX: ffffffea EBX: 00000000 ECX: d9356fb0 EDX: d7c2b154
[ 49.061229][ T1] ESI: 00000000 EDI: 0000019a EBP: c028dc48 ESP: c028dc38
[ 49.062886][ T1] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0000 SS: 0068 EFLAGS: 00010246
[ 49.064685][ T1] CR0: 80050033 CR2: 00000000 CR3: 189ab000 CR4: 000406f0
[ 49.066358][ T1] DR0: 00000000 DR1: 00000000 DR2: 00000000 DR3: 00000000
[ 49.068020][ T1] DR6: fffe0ff0 DR7: 00000400
[ 49.069132][ T1] Call Trace:
[ 49.069902][ T1] ? show_regs (??:?)
[ 49.070890][ T1] ? register_btf_kfunc_id_set (??:?)
[ 49.072187][ T1] ? __warn (??:?)
[ 49.073151][ T1] ? register_btf_kfunc_id_set (??:?)
[ 49.074480][ T1] ? register_btf_kfunc_id_set (??:?)
[ 49.075751][ T1] ? report_bug (??:?)
[ 49.076858][ T1] ? exc_overflow (??:?)
[ 49.077925][ T1] ? handle_bug (traps.c:?)
[ 49.078947][ T1] ? exc_invalid_op (??:?)
[ 49.080030][ T1] ? handle_exception (init_task.c:?)
[ 49.081174][ T1] ? get_seg_base_limit (insn-eval.c:?)
[ 49.082393][ T1] ? mutex_lock_killable_nested (??:?)
[ 49.083707][ T1] ? exc_overflow (??:?)
[ 49.084782][ T1] ? register_btf_kfunc_id_set (??:?)
[ 49.086126][ T1] ? mutex_lock_killable_nested (??:?)
[ 49.087468][ T1] ? exc_overflow (??:?)
[ 49.088520][ T1] ? register_btf_kfunc_id_set (??:?)
[ 49.089864][ T1] ? cubictcp_register (tcp_cubic.c:?)
[ 49.090991][ T1] do_one_initcall (??:?)
[ 49.092136][ T1] ? pvclock_clocksource_read_nowd (??:?)
[ 49.093607][ T1] ? __lock_acquire (lockdep.c:?)
[ 49.094756][ T1] ? kvm_sched_clock_read (kvmclock.c:?)
[ 49.095985][ T1] ? sched_clock_noinstr (??:?)
[ 49.097144][ T1] ? local_clock_noinstr (??:?)
[ 49.098393][ T1] ? __lock_acquire (lockdep.c:?)
[ 49.099575][ T1] ? sched_clock_noinstr (??:?)
[ 49.100746][ T1] ? local_clock_noinstr (??:?)
[ 49.101997][ T1] ? pvclock_clocksource_read_nowd (??:?)
[ 49.103439][ T1] ? kvm_sched_clock_read (kvmclock.c:?)
[ 49.104673][ T1] ? pvclock_clocksource_read_nowd (??:?)
[ 49.106095][ T1] ? kvm_sched_clock_read (kvmclock.c:?)
[ 49.107310][ T1] ? sched_clock_noinstr (??:?)
[ 49.109773][ T1] ? local_clock_noinstr (??:?)
[ 49.111018][ T1] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check (??:?)
[ 49.112289][ T1] ? irqtime_account_irq (??:?)
[ 49.113534][ T1] ? irqtime_account_delta (build_policy.c:?)
[ 49.114812][ T1] ? irqentry_exit (??:?)
[ 49.115860][ T1] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check (??:?)
[ 49.117126][ T1] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on (??:?)
[ 49.118370][ T1] ? sysvec_reboot (??:?)
[ 49.119450][ T1] ? trace_hardirqs_on (??:?)
[ 49.120623][ T1] ? irqentry_exit (??:?)
[ 49.121703][ T1] ? sysvec_reschedule_ipi (??:?)
[ 49.122962][ T1] ? handle_exception (init_task.c:?)
[ 49.124130][ T1] ? strlen (??:?)
[ 49.125054][ T1] ? next_arg (??:?)
[ 49.126086][ T1] ? parse_args (??:?)
[ 49.127134][ T1] ? tcp_diag_init (tcp_cubic.c:?)
[ 49.128257][ T1] do_initcall_level (main.c:?)
[ 49.129398][ T1] ? kernel_init (main.c:?)
[ 49.130474][ T1] do_initcalls (main.c:?)
[ 49.131494][ T1] do_basic_setup (main.c:?)
[ 49.132558][ T1] kernel_init_freeable (main.c:?)
[ 49.133781][ T1] ? rest_init (main.c:?)
[ 49.134848][ T1] ? rest_init (main.c:?)
[ 49.135885][ T1] kernel_init (main.c:?)
[ 49.136958][ T1] ret_from_fork (??:?)
[ 49.137979][ T1] ret_from_fork_asm (??:?)
[ 49.139078][ T1] entry_INT80_32 (init_task.c:?)
[ 49.140171][ T1] irq event stamp: 16737757
[ 49.141202][ T1] hardirqs last enabled at (16737765): console_unlock (??:?)
[ 49.143298][ T1] hardirqs last disabled at (16737774): console_unlock (??:?)
[ 49.145355][ T1] softirqs last enabled at (16737610): do_softirq_own_stack (??:?)
[ 49.147553][ T1] softirqs last disabled at (16737605): do_softirq_own_stack (??:?)
[ 49.149757][ T1] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
[ 49.151671][ T1] NET: Registered PF_INET6 protocol family
[ 49.156896][ T1] Segment Routing with IPv6
[ 49.158068][ T1] In-situ OAM (IOAM) with IPv6
[ 49.159300][ T1] sit: IPv6, IPv4 and MPLS over IPv4 tunneling driver
[ 49.162798][ T1] NET: Registered PF_PACKET protocol family
[ 49.164686][ T1] 9pnet: Installing 9P2000 support
[ 49.166257][ T1] start plist test
[ 49.168281][ T1] end plist test
[ 49.173855][ T1] IPI shorthand broadcast: enabled
[ 49.175165][ C0] ... APIC ID: 00000000 (0)
[ 49.176383][ C0] ... APIC VERSION: 00050014
[ 49.177486][ C0] 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
[ 49.177486][ C0] 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000008001000
The kernel config and materials to reproduce are available at:
https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240204/202402041610.775e7f75-lkp@intel.com
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-05 2:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-29 1:24 [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/3] Annotate kfuncs in .BTF_ids section Daniel Xu
2024-01-29 1:24 ` Daniel Xu
2024-01-29 1:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/3] bpf: btf: Support flags for BTF_SET8 sets Daniel Xu
2024-01-29 1:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 2/3] bpf: btf: Add BTF_KFUNCS_START/END macro pair Daniel Xu
2024-01-29 1:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 3/3] bpf: treewide: Annotate BPF kfuncs in BTF Daniel Xu
2024-01-31 9:24 ` Benjamin Tissoires
2024-02-05 2:41 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2024-01-31 9:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/3] Annotate kfuncs in .BTF_ids section Jiri Olsa
2024-01-31 9:47 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-01-31 20:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2024-01-31 20:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2024-02-02 23:09 ` Manu Bretelle
2024-02-02 23:09 ` Manu Bretelle
2024-02-03 1:34 ` Daniel Xu
2024-02-03 1:34 ` Daniel Xu
2024-02-03 14:40 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-02-03 14:40 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-02-03 18:45 ` Manu Bretelle
2024-02-03 18:45 ` Manu Bretelle
2024-02-05 18:43 ` Viktor Malik
2024-02-05 18:43 ` Viktor Malik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202402041610.775e7f75-lkp@intel.com \
--to=oliver.sang@intel.com \
--cc=alan.maguire@oracle.com \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=coreteam@netfilter.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=dxu@dxuuu.xyz \
--cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fsverity@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=jikos@kernel.org \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kadlec@netfilter.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizefan.x@bytedance.com \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mykolal@fb.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=olsajiri@gmail.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=quentin@isovalent.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sdf@google.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.