All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: <oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev>, <lkp@intel.com>,
	Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>, <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Subject: [broonie-misc:kselftest-seccomp-benchmark-ktap] [kselftest/seccomp] 626fa92237: kernel-selftests.seccomp.seccomp_benchmark.fail
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2024 14:27:36 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202402061002.3a8722fd-oliver.sang@intel.com> (raw)



Hello,

kernel test robot noticed "kernel-selftests.seccomp.seccomp_benchmark.fail" on:

commit: 626fa9223749db85f03678573dd49ba2c7b6cd8b ("kselftest/seccomp: Report each expectation we assert as a KTAP test")
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/broonie/misc.git kselftest-seccomp-benchmark-ktap

in testcase: kernel-selftests
version: kernel-selftests-x86_64-60acb023-1_20230329
with following parameters:

	group: group-s



compiler: gcc-12
test machine: 36 threads 1 sockets Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-10980XE CPU @ 3.00GHz (Cascade Lake) with 32G memory

(please refer to attached dmesg/kmsg for entire log/backtrace)




If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202402061002.3a8722fd-oliver.sang@intel.com



# timeout set to 120
# selftests: seccomp: seccomp_benchmark
# TAP version 13
# 1..7
# # Running on:
# # Linux lkp-csl-d01 6.8.0-rc1-00003-g626fa9223749 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Wed Jan 31 08:33:40 CST 2024 x86_64 GNU/Linux
# # Current BPF sysctl settings:
# # /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable:1
# # /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_harden:0
# # Calibrating sample size for 15 seconds worth of syscalls ...
# # Benchmarking 36800370 syscalls...
# # 15.443201110 - 1.042366576 = 14400834534 (14.4s)
# # getpid native: 391 ns
# # 31.586833659 - 15.443583738 = 16143249921 (16.1s)
# # getpid RET_ALLOW 1 filter (bitmap): 438 ns
# # 47.494976754 - 31.587621280 = 15907355474 (15.9s)
# # getpid RET_ALLOW 2 filters (bitmap): 432 ns
# # 66.262898246 - 47.495560365 = 18767337881 (18.8s)
# # getpid RET_ALLOW 3 filters (full): 509 ns
# # 86.089613909 - 66.263287445 = 19826326464 (19.8s)
# # getpid RET_ALLOW 4 filters (full): 538 ns
# # Estimated total seccomp overhead for 1 bitmapped filter: 47 ns
# # Estimated total seccomp overhead for 2 bitmapped filters: 41 ns
# # Estimated total seccomp overhead for 3 full filters: 118 ns
# # Estimated total seccomp overhead for 4 full filters: 147 ns
# # Estimated seccomp entry overhead: 53 ns
# # Estimated seccomp per-filter overhead (last 2 diff): 29 ns
# # Estimated seccomp per-filter overhead (filters / 4): 23 ns
# # Expectations:
# # 	native ≤ 1 bitmap (391 ≤ 438): ✔️
# ok 1 native ≤ 1 bitmap
# # 	native ≤ 1 filter (391 ≤ 509): ✔️
# ok 2 native ≤ 1 filter
# # 	per-filter (last 2 diff) ≈ per-filter (filters / 4) (29 ≈ 23): ❌
# not ok 3 per-filter (last 2 diff) ≈ per-filter (filters / 4)
# # 	1 bitmapped ≈ 2 bitmapped (47 ≈ 41): ❌
# not ok 4 1 bitmapped ≈ 2 bitmapped
# # Skipping constant action bitmap expectations: they appear unsupported.
# ok 5 # SKIP entry ≈ 1 bitmapped
# ok 6 # SKIP entry ≈ 2 bitmapped
# ok 7 # SKIP native + entry + (per filter * 4) ≈ 4 filters total
# # Saw unexpected benchmark result. Try running again with more samples?
# # Totals: pass:2 fail:2 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:3 error:0
not ok 2 selftests: seccomp: seccomp_benchmark # exit=1



The kernel config and materials to reproduce are available at:
https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240206/202402061002.3a8722fd-oliver.sang@intel.com



-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki


                 reply	other threads:[~2024-02-06  6:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202402061002.3a8722fd-oliver.sang@intel.com \
    --to=oliver.sang@intel.com \
    --cc=anders.roxell@linaro.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.