From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev
Subject: [djwong-xfs:timestats-cleanups 547/548] lib/math/mean_and_variance_test.c:33:43: error: field designator 'weight' does not refer to any field in type 'struct mean_and_variance_weighted'
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2024 11:59:40 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202402071103.5jXo7Iym-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/djwong/xfs-linux.git timestats-cleanups
head: d07e8ccdf01715f8c7fbbdea9d7910d89c6684fb
commit: 9c23552695abf8c3bacbae100e838e70ad8921e1 [547/548] mean_and_variance: put struct mean_and_variance_weighted on a diet
config: powerpc-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240207/202402071103.5jXo7Iym-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 19.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 7dd790db8b77c4a833c06632e903dc4f13877a64)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240207/202402071103.5jXo7Iym-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202402071103.5jXo7Iym-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> lib/math/mean_and_variance_test.c:33:43: error: field designator 'weight' does not refer to any field in type 'struct mean_and_variance_weighted'
33 | struct mean_and_variance_weighted s = { .weight = 2 };
| ~^~~~~~~~~~
>> lib/math/mean_and_variance_test.c:35:42: error: too few arguments to function call, expected 4, have 2
35 | mean_and_variance_weighted_update(&s, 10);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/linux/mean_and_variance.h:193:6: note: 'mean_and_variance_weighted_update' declared here
193 | void mean_and_variance_weighted_update(struct mean_and_variance_weighted *s,
| ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
194 | s64 v, bool initted, u8 weight);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
lib/math/mean_and_variance_test.c:36:61: error: too few arguments to function call, expected 2, have 1
36 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, mean_and_variance_weighted_get_mean(s), 10);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/kunit/test.h:882:28: note: expanded from macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ'
882 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, left, right, NULL)
| ^~~~
include/kunit/test.h:887:8: note: expanded from macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG'
887 | left, ==, right, \
| ^~~~
include/kunit/test.h:726:9: note: expanded from macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_INT_ASSERTION'
726 | left, op, right, \
| ^~~~
include/kunit/test.h:693:15: note: expanded from macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION'
693 | const typeof(left) __left = (left); \
| ^~~~
include/linux/mean_and_variance.h:196:5: note: 'mean_and_variance_weighted_get_mean' declared here
196 | s64 mean_and_variance_weighted_get_mean(struct mean_and_variance_weighted s,
| ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
197 | u8 weight);
| ~~~~~~~~~
lib/math/mean_and_variance_test.c:36:61: error: too few arguments to function call, expected 2, have 1
36 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, mean_and_variance_weighted_get_mean(s), 10);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/kunit/test.h:882:28: note: expanded from macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ'
882 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, left, right, NULL)
| ^~~~
include/kunit/test.h:887:8: note: expanded from macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG'
887 | left, ==, right, \
| ^~~~
include/kunit/test.h:726:9: note: expanded from macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_INT_ASSERTION'
726 | left, op, right, \
| ^~~~
include/kunit/test.h:693:31: note: expanded from macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION'
693 | const typeof(left) __left = (left); \
| ^~~~
include/linux/mean_and_variance.h:196:5: note: 'mean_and_variance_weighted_get_mean' declared here
196 | s64 mean_and_variance_weighted_get_mean(struct mean_and_variance_weighted s,
| ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
197 | u8 weight);
| ~~~~~~~~~
lib/math/mean_and_variance_test.c:37:65: error: too few arguments to function call, expected 2, have 1
37 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, mean_and_variance_weighted_get_variance(s), 0);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/kunit/test.h:882:28: note: expanded from macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ'
882 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, left, right, NULL)
| ^~~~
include/kunit/test.h:887:8: note: expanded from macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG'
887 | left, ==, right, \
| ^~~~
include/kunit/test.h:726:9: note: expanded from macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_INT_ASSERTION'
726 | left, op, right, \
| ^~~~
include/kunit/test.h:693:15: note: expanded from macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION'
693 | const typeof(left) __left = (left); \
| ^~~~
include/linux/mean_and_variance.h:198:5: note: 'mean_and_variance_weighted_get_variance' declared here
198 | u64 mean_and_variance_weighted_get_variance(struct mean_and_variance_weighted s,
| ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
199 | u8 weight);
| ~~~~~~~~~
lib/math/mean_and_variance_test.c:37:65: error: too few arguments to function call, expected 2, have 1
37 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, mean_and_variance_weighted_get_variance(s), 0);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/kunit/test.h:882:28: note: expanded from macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ'
882 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, left, right, NULL)
| ^~~~
include/kunit/test.h:887:8: note: expanded from macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG'
887 | left, ==, right, \
| ^~~~
include/kunit/test.h:726:9: note: expanded from macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_INT_ASSERTION'
726 | left, op, right, \
| ^~~~
include/kunit/test.h:693:31: note: expanded from macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION'
693 | const typeof(left) __left = (left); \
| ^~~~
include/linux/mean_and_variance.h:198:5: note: 'mean_and_variance_weighted_get_variance' declared here
198 | u64 mean_and_variance_weighted_get_variance(struct mean_and_variance_weighted s,
| ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
199 | u8 weight);
| ~~~~~~~~~
lib/math/mean_and_variance_test.c:39:42: error: too few arguments to function call, expected 4, have 2
39 | mean_and_variance_weighted_update(&s, 20);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/linux/mean_and_variance.h:193:6: note: 'mean_and_variance_weighted_update' declared here
193 | void mean_and_variance_weighted_update(struct mean_and_variance_weighted *s,
| ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
194 | s64 v, bool initted, u8 weight);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
lib/math/mean_and_variance_test.c:40:61: error: too few arguments to function call, expected 2, have 1
40 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, mean_and_variance_weighted_get_mean(s), 12);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/kunit/test.h:882:28: note: expanded from macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ'
882 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, left, right, NULL)
vim +33 lib/math/mean_and_variance_test.c
92095781e0f607 fs/bcachefs/mean_and_variance_test.c Daniel Hill 2022-08-06 25
92095781e0f607 fs/bcachefs/mean_and_variance_test.c Daniel Hill 2022-08-06 26 /*
92095781e0f607 fs/bcachefs/mean_and_variance_test.c Daniel Hill 2022-08-06 27 * Test values computed using a spreadsheet from the psuedocode at the bottom:
92095781e0f607 fs/bcachefs/mean_and_variance_test.c Daniel Hill 2022-08-06 28 * https://fanf2.user.srcf.net/hermes/doc/antiforgery/stats.pdf
92095781e0f607 fs/bcachefs/mean_and_variance_test.c Daniel Hill 2022-08-06 29 */
92095781e0f607 fs/bcachefs/mean_and_variance_test.c Daniel Hill 2022-08-06 30
92095781e0f607 fs/bcachefs/mean_and_variance_test.c Daniel Hill 2022-08-06 31 static void mean_and_variance_weighted_test(struct kunit *test)
92095781e0f607 fs/bcachefs/mean_and_variance_test.c Daniel Hill 2022-08-06 32 {
92095781e0f607 fs/bcachefs/mean_and_variance_test.c Daniel Hill 2022-08-06 @33 struct mean_and_variance_weighted s = { .weight = 2 };
92095781e0f607 fs/bcachefs/mean_and_variance_test.c Daniel Hill 2022-08-06 34
92095781e0f607 fs/bcachefs/mean_and_variance_test.c Daniel Hill 2022-08-06 @35 mean_and_variance_weighted_update(&s, 10);
92095781e0f607 fs/bcachefs/mean_and_variance_test.c Daniel Hill 2022-08-06 36 KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, mean_and_variance_weighted_get_mean(s), 10);
92095781e0f607 fs/bcachefs/mean_and_variance_test.c Daniel Hill 2022-08-06 37 KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, mean_and_variance_weighted_get_variance(s), 0);
92095781e0f607 fs/bcachefs/mean_and_variance_test.c Daniel Hill 2022-08-06 38
92095781e0f607 fs/bcachefs/mean_and_variance_test.c Daniel Hill 2022-08-06 39 mean_and_variance_weighted_update(&s, 20);
92095781e0f607 fs/bcachefs/mean_and_variance_test.c Daniel Hill 2022-08-06 40 KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, mean_and_variance_weighted_get_mean(s), 12);
92095781e0f607 fs/bcachefs/mean_and_variance_test.c Daniel Hill 2022-08-06 41 KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, mean_and_variance_weighted_get_variance(s), 18);
92095781e0f607 fs/bcachefs/mean_and_variance_test.c Daniel Hill 2022-08-06 42
92095781e0f607 fs/bcachefs/mean_and_variance_test.c Daniel Hill 2022-08-06 43 mean_and_variance_weighted_update(&s, 30);
92095781e0f607 fs/bcachefs/mean_and_variance_test.c Daniel Hill 2022-08-06 44 KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, mean_and_variance_weighted_get_mean(s), 16);
92095781e0f607 fs/bcachefs/mean_and_variance_test.c Daniel Hill 2022-08-06 45 KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, mean_and_variance_weighted_get_variance(s), 72);
92095781e0f607 fs/bcachefs/mean_and_variance_test.c Daniel Hill 2022-08-06 46
92095781e0f607 fs/bcachefs/mean_and_variance_test.c Daniel Hill 2022-08-06 47 s = (struct mean_and_variance_weighted) { .weight = 2 };
92095781e0f607 fs/bcachefs/mean_and_variance_test.c Daniel Hill 2022-08-06 48
92095781e0f607 fs/bcachefs/mean_and_variance_test.c Daniel Hill 2022-08-06 49 mean_and_variance_weighted_update(&s, -10);
92095781e0f607 fs/bcachefs/mean_and_variance_test.c Daniel Hill 2022-08-06 50 KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, mean_and_variance_weighted_get_mean(s), -10);
92095781e0f607 fs/bcachefs/mean_and_variance_test.c Daniel Hill 2022-08-06 51 KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, mean_and_variance_weighted_get_variance(s), 0);
92095781e0f607 fs/bcachefs/mean_and_variance_test.c Daniel Hill 2022-08-06 52
92095781e0f607 fs/bcachefs/mean_and_variance_test.c Daniel Hill 2022-08-06 53 mean_and_variance_weighted_update(&s, -20);
92095781e0f607 fs/bcachefs/mean_and_variance_test.c Daniel Hill 2022-08-06 54 KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, mean_and_variance_weighted_get_mean(s), -12);
92095781e0f607 fs/bcachefs/mean_and_variance_test.c Daniel Hill 2022-08-06 55 KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, mean_and_variance_weighted_get_variance(s), 18);
92095781e0f607 fs/bcachefs/mean_and_variance_test.c Daniel Hill 2022-08-06 56
92095781e0f607 fs/bcachefs/mean_and_variance_test.c Daniel Hill 2022-08-06 57 mean_and_variance_weighted_update(&s, -30);
92095781e0f607 fs/bcachefs/mean_and_variance_test.c Daniel Hill 2022-08-06 58 KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, mean_and_variance_weighted_get_mean(s), -16);
92095781e0f607 fs/bcachefs/mean_and_variance_test.c Daniel Hill 2022-08-06 59 KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, mean_and_variance_weighted_get_variance(s), 72);
92095781e0f607 fs/bcachefs/mean_and_variance_test.c Daniel Hill 2022-08-06 60 }
92095781e0f607 fs/bcachefs/mean_and_variance_test.c Daniel Hill 2022-08-06 61
:::::: The code at line 33 was first introduced by commit
:::::: 92095781e0f607e735971c1a6462ca6dad8826d2 bcachefs: Mean and variance
:::::: TO: Daniel Hill <daniel@gluo.nz>
:::::: CC: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
reply other threads:[~2024-02-07 4:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202402071103.5jXo7Iym-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.