From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Joe Damato <jdamato@fastly.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
chuck.lever@oracle.com, jlayton@kernel.org,
linux-api@vger.kernel.org, brauner@kernel.org,
edumazet@google.com, davem@davemloft.net,
alexander.duyck@gmail.com, sridhar.samudrala@intel.com,
willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com, weiwan@google.com,
David.Laight@ACULAB.COM, arnd@arndb.de, sdf@google.com,
amritha.nambiar@intel.com,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org (open list:FILESYSTEMS (VFS and
infrastructure))
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 1/4] eventpoll: support busy poll per epoll instance
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2024 11:04:13 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240207110413.0cfedc37@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240205210453.11301-2-jdamato@fastly.com>
On Mon, 5 Feb 2024 21:04:46 +0000 Joe Damato wrote:
> Allow busy polling on a per-epoll context basis. The per-epoll context
> usec timeout value is preferred, but the pre-existing system wide sysctl
> value is still supported if it specified.
Why do we need u64 for usecs? I think u16 would do, and u32 would give
a very solid "engineering margin". If it was discussed in previous
versions I think it's worth explaining in the commit message.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-07 19:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-05 21:04 [PATCH net-next v6 0/4] Per epoll context busy poll support Joe Damato
2024-02-05 21:04 ` [PATCH net-next v6 1/4] eventpoll: support busy poll per epoll instance Joe Damato
2024-02-07 19:04 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2024-02-07 19:14 ` Joe Damato
2024-02-07 20:11 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-02-07 20:23 ` Joe Damato
2024-02-07 20:56 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-02-08 17:46 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-02-08 18:06 ` Joe Damato
2024-02-05 21:04 ` [PATCH net-next v6 2/4] eventpoll: Add per-epoll busy poll packet budget Joe Damato
2024-02-07 19:04 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-02-08 17:47 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-02-05 21:04 ` [PATCH net-next v6 3/4] eventpoll: Add per-epoll prefer busy poll option Joe Damato
2024-02-07 19:04 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-02-08 17:49 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-02-05 21:04 ` [PATCH net-next v6 4/4] eventpoll: Add epoll ioctl for epoll_params Joe Damato
2024-02-07 8:37 ` Jiri Slaby
2024-02-07 18:50 ` Joe Damato
2024-02-07 19:07 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-02-07 19:16 ` Joe Damato
2024-02-07 20:18 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-02-06 18:51 ` [PATCH net-next v6 0/4] Per epoll context busy poll support Stanislav Fomichev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240207110413.0cfedc37@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=David.Laight@ACULAB.COM \
--cc=alexander.duyck@gmail.com \
--cc=amritha.nambiar@intel.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jdamato@fastly.com \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sdf@google.com \
--cc=sridhar.samudrala@intel.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=weiwan@google.com \
--cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.