From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>,
Coco Li <lixiaoyan@google.com>,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] selftests: net: cope with slow env in gro.sh test
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2024 18:51:51 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240207185151.4ea8a342@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240207184252.5d7327fa@kernel.org>
On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 18:42:52 -0800 Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Feb 2024 16:27:40 +0100 Paolo Abeni wrote:
> > The gro self-tests sends the packets to be aggregated with
> > multiple write operations.
> >
> > When running is slow environment, it's hard to guarantee that
> > the GRO engine will wait for the last packet in an intended
> > train.
> >
> > The above causes almost deterministic failures in our CI for
> > the 'large' test-case.
> >
> > Address the issue explicitly ignoring failures for such case
> > in slow environments (KSFT_MACHINE_SLOW==true).
> >
> > Fixes: 7d1575014a63 ("selftests/net: GRO coalesce test")
> > Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > Note that the fixes tag is there mainly to justify targeting the net
> > tree, and this is aiming at net to hopefully make the test more stable
> > ASAP for both trees.
> >
> > I experimented with a largish refactory replacing the multiple writes
> > with a single GSO packet, but exhausted by time budget before reaching
> > any good result.
>
> It does make things a lot more stable, but there was still a failure
> recently:
>
> https://netdev-3.bots.linux.dev/vmksft-net-dbg/results/455661/36-gro-sh/stdout
>
> :(
Ah, sorry, I missed the v2. That must have been between v1 and v2.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-08 2:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-06 15:27 [PATCH net] selftests: net: cope with slow env in gro.sh test Paolo Abeni
2024-02-06 15:46 ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-02-07 11:16 ` Matthieu Baerts
2024-02-07 14:35 ` Paolo Abeni
2024-02-07 14:45 ` Matthieu Baerts
2024-02-08 2:42 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-02-08 2:51 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240207185151.4ea8a342@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lixiaoyan@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.