All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Kent Gibson <warthog618@gmail.com>, Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
	"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3 05/24] gpio: don't set label from irq helpers
Date: Thu,  8 Feb 2024 10:59:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240208095920.8035-6-brgl@bgdev.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240208095920.8035-1-brgl@bgdev.pl>

From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>

We will soon serialize access to the descriptor label using SRCU. The
write-side of the protection will require calling synchronize_srcu()
which must not be called from atomic context. We have two irq helpers:
gpiochip_lock_as_irq() and gpiochip_unlock_as_irq() that set the label
if the GPIO is not requested but is being used as interrupt. They are
called with a spinlock held from the interrupt subsystem.

They must not do it if we are to use SRCU so instead let's move the
special corner case to a dedicated getter.

Don't actually set the label to "interrupt" in the above case but rather
use the newly added gpiod_get_label() helper to hide the logic that
atomically checks the descriptor flags and returns the address of a
static "interrupt" string.

Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 21 ++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
index 8331fdbb6faa..fbfddc9860fd 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
@@ -107,7 +107,14 @@ static bool gpiolib_initialized;
 
 const char *gpiod_get_label(struct gpio_desc *desc)
 {
-	return desc->label;
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	flags = READ_ONCE(desc->flags);
+	if (test_bit(FLAG_USED_AS_IRQ, &flags) &&
+	    !test_bit(FLAG_REQUESTED, &flags))
+		return "interrupt";
+
+	return test_bit(FLAG_REQUESTED, &flags) ? desc->label : NULL;
 }
 
 static inline void desc_set_label(struct gpio_desc *d, const char *label)
@@ -3599,14 +3606,6 @@ int gpiochip_lock_as_irq(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset)
 	set_bit(FLAG_USED_AS_IRQ, &desc->flags);
 	set_bit(FLAG_IRQ_IS_ENABLED, &desc->flags);
 
-	/*
-	 * If the consumer has not set up a label (such as when the
-	 * IRQ is referenced from .to_irq()) we set up a label here
-	 * so it is clear this is used as an interrupt.
-	 */
-	if (!desc->label)
-		desc_set_label(desc, "interrupt");
-
 	return 0;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpiochip_lock_as_irq);
@@ -3629,10 +3628,6 @@ void gpiochip_unlock_as_irq(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset)
 
 	clear_bit(FLAG_USED_AS_IRQ, &desc->flags);
 	clear_bit(FLAG_IRQ_IS_ENABLED, &desc->flags);
-
-	/* If we only had this marking, erase it */
-	if (desc->label && !strcmp(desc->label, "interrupt"))
-		desc_set_label(desc, NULL);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpiochip_unlock_as_irq);
 
-- 
2.40.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-02-08  9:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CGME20240213120518eucas1p2d514aac6e6d1e29bbae05f32db6724db@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
2024-02-08  9:58 ` [PATCH v3 00/24] gpio: rework locking and object life-time control Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-08  9:58   ` [PATCH v3 01/24] gpio: protect the list of GPIO devices with SRCU Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-10 11:00     ` Hillf Danton
2024-02-10 11:07       ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-08  9:58   ` [PATCH v3 02/24] gpio: of: assign and read the hog pointer atomically Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-08  9:58   ` [PATCH v3 03/24] gpio: remove unused logging helpers Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-08  9:59   ` [PATCH v3 04/24] gpio: provide and use gpiod_get_label() Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-08  9:59   ` Bartosz Golaszewski [this message]
2024-02-08  9:59   ` [PATCH v3 06/24] gpio: add SRCU infrastructure to struct gpio_desc Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-08  9:59   ` [PATCH v3 07/24] gpio: protect the descriptor label with SRCU Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-12 14:56     ` kernel test robot
2024-02-13 21:16     ` Mark Brown
2024-02-13 22:07       ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-08  9:59   ` [PATCH v3 08/24] gpio: sysfs: use gpio_device_find() to iterate over existing devices Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-08  9:59   ` [PATCH v3 09/24] gpio: remove gpio_lock Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-08  9:59   ` [PATCH v3 10/24] gpio: reinforce desc->flags handling Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-08  9:59   ` [PATCH v3 11/24] gpio: remove unneeded code from gpio_device_get_desc() Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-08  9:59   ` [PATCH v3 12/24] gpio: sysfs: extend the critical section for unregistering sysfs devices Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-08  9:59   ` [PATCH v3 13/24] gpio: sysfs: pass the GPIO device - not chip - to sysfs callbacks Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-08  9:59   ` [PATCH v3 14/24] gpio: cdev: replace gpiochip_get_desc() with gpio_device_get_desc() Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-08  9:59   ` [PATCH v3 15/24] gpio: cdev: don't access gdev->chip if it's not needed Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-08  9:59   ` [PATCH v3 16/24] gpio: sysfs: " Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-08 12:20     ` Linus Walleij
2024-02-08  9:59   ` [PATCH v3 17/24] gpio: don't dereference gdev->chip in gpiochip_setup_dev() Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-08 12:21     ` Linus Walleij
2024-02-08  9:59   ` [PATCH v3 18/24] gpio: reduce the functionality of validate_desc() Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-08  9:59   ` [PATCH v3 19/24] gpio: remove unnecessary checks from gpiod_to_chip() Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-08 17:39     ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-02-08 19:17       ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-08 19:24         ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-02-08 19:34           ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-09 13:59             ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-02-08  9:59   ` [PATCH v3 20/24] gpio: add the can_sleep flag to struct gpio_device Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-08  9:59   ` [PATCH v3 21/24] gpio: add SRCU infrastructure " Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-08  9:59   ` [PATCH v3 22/24] gpio: protect the pointer to gpio_chip in gpio_device with SRCU Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-12 15:09     ` kernel test robot
2024-02-12 16:56       ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-12 21:20       ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-13  8:10         ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-08  9:59   ` [PATCH v3 23/24] gpio: remove the RW semaphore from the GPIO device Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-10  5:37     ` Kent Gibson
2024-02-12  9:53       ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-12  9:57         ` Kent Gibson
2024-02-12  9:59           ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-08  9:59   ` [PATCH v3 24/24] gpio: mark unsafe gpio_chip manipulators as deprecated Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-08 17:43   ` [PATCH v3 00/24] gpio: rework locking and object life-time control Andy Shevchenko
2024-02-12 10:07   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-02-13 12:05   ` Marek Szyprowski
2024-02-13 12:08     ` Bartosz Golaszewski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240208095920.8035-6-brgl@bgdev.pl \
    --to=brgl@bgdev.pl \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org \
    --cc=elder@linaro.org \
    --cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=warthog618@gmail.com \
    --cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.