All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org,willy@infradead.org,timmurray@google.com,surenb@google.com,rppt@kernel.org,peterx@redhat.com,ngeoffray@google.com,Liam.Howlett@oracle.com,kaleshsingh@google.com,jannh@google.com,david@redhat.com,bgeffon@google.com,axelrasmussen@google.com,aarcange@redhat.com,lokeshgidra@google.com,akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: + userfaultfd-move-userfaultfd_ctx-struct-to-header-file.patch added to mm-unstable branch
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2024 13:42:20 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240208214221.6CFC2C433C7@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)


The patch titled
     Subject: userfaultfd: move userfaultfd_ctx struct to header file
has been added to the -mm mm-unstable branch.  Its filename is
     userfaultfd-move-userfaultfd_ctx-struct-to-header-file.patch

This patch will shortly appear at
     https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patches/userfaultfd-move-userfaultfd_ctx-struct-to-header-file.patch

This patch will later appear in the mm-unstable branch at
    git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm

Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
   a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
   b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
   c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
      reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's

*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***

The -mm tree is included into linux-next via the mm-everything
branch at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
and is updated there every 2-3 working days

------------------------------------------------------
From: Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@google.com>
Subject: userfaultfd: move userfaultfd_ctx struct to header file
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2024 13:22:02 -0800

Patch series "per-vma locks in userfaultfd", v4.

Performing userfaultfd operations (like copy/move etc.) in critical
section of mmap_lock (read-mode) causes significant contention on the lock
when operations requiring the lock in write-mode are taking place
concurrently.  We can use per-vma locks instead to significantly reduce
the contention issue.

Android runtime's Garbage Collector uses userfaultfd for concurrent
compaction.  mmap-lock contention during compaction potentially causes
jittery experience for the user.  During one such reproducible scenario,
we observed the following improvements with this patch-set:

- Wall clock time of compaction phase came down from ~3s to <500ms
- Uninterruptible sleep time (across all threads in the process) was
  ~10ms (none in mmap_lock) during compaction, instead of >20s


This patch (of 3):

Move the struct to userfaultfd_k.h to be accessible from mm/userfaultfd.c.
There are no other changes in the struct.

This is required to prepare for using per-vma locks in userfaultfd
operations.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240208212204.2043140-1-lokeshgidra@google.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240208212204.2043140-2-lokeshgidra@google.com
Signed-off-by: Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Cc: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Cc: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>
Cc: kernel-team@android.com
Cc: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Nicolas Geoffray <ngeoffray@google.com>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Cc: Tim Murray <timmurray@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 fs/userfaultfd.c              |   39 --------------------------------
 include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h |   39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/userfaultfd.c~userfaultfd-move-userfaultfd_ctx-struct-to-header-file
+++ a/fs/userfaultfd.c
@@ -50,45 +50,6 @@ static struct ctl_table vm_userfaultfd_t
 
 static struct kmem_cache *userfaultfd_ctx_cachep __ro_after_init;
 
-/*
- * Start with fault_pending_wqh and fault_wqh so they're more likely
- * to be in the same cacheline.
- *
- * Locking order:
- *	fd_wqh.lock
- *		fault_pending_wqh.lock
- *			fault_wqh.lock
- *		event_wqh.lock
- *
- * To avoid deadlocks, IRQs must be disabled when taking any of the above locks,
- * since fd_wqh.lock is taken by aio_poll() while it's holding a lock that's
- * also taken in IRQ context.
- */
-struct userfaultfd_ctx {
-	/* waitqueue head for the pending (i.e. not read) userfaults */
-	wait_queue_head_t fault_pending_wqh;
-	/* waitqueue head for the userfaults */
-	wait_queue_head_t fault_wqh;
-	/* waitqueue head for the pseudo fd to wakeup poll/read */
-	wait_queue_head_t fd_wqh;
-	/* waitqueue head for events */
-	wait_queue_head_t event_wqh;
-	/* a refile sequence protected by fault_pending_wqh lock */
-	seqcount_spinlock_t refile_seq;
-	/* pseudo fd refcounting */
-	refcount_t refcount;
-	/* userfaultfd syscall flags */
-	unsigned int flags;
-	/* features requested from the userspace */
-	unsigned int features;
-	/* released */
-	bool released;
-	/* memory mappings are changing because of non-cooperative event */
-	atomic_t mmap_changing;
-	/* mm with one ore more vmas attached to this userfaultfd_ctx */
-	struct mm_struct *mm;
-};
-
 struct userfaultfd_fork_ctx {
 	struct userfaultfd_ctx *orig;
 	struct userfaultfd_ctx *new;
--- a/include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h~userfaultfd-move-userfaultfd_ctx-struct-to-header-file
+++ a/include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h
@@ -36,6 +36,45 @@
 #define UFFD_SHARED_FCNTL_FLAGS (O_CLOEXEC | O_NONBLOCK)
 #define UFFD_FLAGS_SET (EFD_SHARED_FCNTL_FLAGS)
 
+/*
+ * Start with fault_pending_wqh and fault_wqh so they're more likely
+ * to be in the same cacheline.
+ *
+ * Locking order:
+ *	fd_wqh.lock
+ *		fault_pending_wqh.lock
+ *			fault_wqh.lock
+ *		event_wqh.lock
+ *
+ * To avoid deadlocks, IRQs must be disabled when taking any of the above locks,
+ * since fd_wqh.lock is taken by aio_poll() while it's holding a lock that's
+ * also taken in IRQ context.
+ */
+struct userfaultfd_ctx {
+	/* waitqueue head for the pending (i.e. not read) userfaults */
+	wait_queue_head_t fault_pending_wqh;
+	/* waitqueue head for the userfaults */
+	wait_queue_head_t fault_wqh;
+	/* waitqueue head for the pseudo fd to wakeup poll/read */
+	wait_queue_head_t fd_wqh;
+	/* waitqueue head for events */
+	wait_queue_head_t event_wqh;
+	/* a refile sequence protected by fault_pending_wqh lock */
+	seqcount_spinlock_t refile_seq;
+	/* pseudo fd refcounting */
+	refcount_t refcount;
+	/* userfaultfd syscall flags */
+	unsigned int flags;
+	/* features requested from the userspace */
+	unsigned int features;
+	/* released */
+	bool released;
+	/* memory mappings are changing because of non-cooperative event */
+	atomic_t mmap_changing;
+	/* mm with one ore more vmas attached to this userfaultfd_ctx */
+	struct mm_struct *mm;
+};
+
 extern vm_fault_t handle_userfault(struct vm_fault *vmf, unsigned long reason);
 
 /* A combined operation mode + behavior flags. */
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from lokeshgidra@google.com are

userfaultfd-fix-return-error-if-mmap_changing-is-non-zero-in-move-ioctl.patch
userfaultfd-move-userfaultfd_ctx-struct-to-header-file.patch
userfaultfd-protect-mmap_changing-with-rw_sem-in-userfaulfd_ctx.patch
userfaultfd-use-per-vma-locks-in-userfaultfd-operations.patch


             reply	other threads:[~2024-02-08 21:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-08 21:42 Andrew Morton [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-02-13  0:33 + userfaultfd-move-userfaultfd_ctx-struct-to-header-file.patch added to mm-unstable branch Andrew Morton
2024-02-14 16:08 Andrew Morton
2024-02-15 22:38 Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240208214221.6CFC2C433C7@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
    --cc=bgeffon@google.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=kaleshsingh@google.com \
    --cc=lokeshgidra@google.com \
    --cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ngeoffray@google.com \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=timmurray@google.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.