Re: [PATCH] pidfd: change pidfd_send_signal() to respect PIDFD_THREAD

[Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>]

On 02/09, Christian Brauner wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 04:57:31PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > On 02/08, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > >
> > > Because honestly right now using group_send_sig_info when
> > > the intended target of the signal is not the entire thread
> > > group is very confusing when reading your change.
> >
> > Agreed, so perhaps it makes sense to rename it later. See
>
> Agreed. The function seems misnamed and incorrectly documented. It just
> seems that it's never been used with PIDTYPE_PID but it's perfectly
> capable of doing that. So maybe just put a patch on top renaming it to
> send_sig_info_type() and remove the old comment. But I can live without
> renaming it for now as well.

OK, I'll update the comment, please see below.

It should probably say more about the case when type > PIDTYPE_TGID,
but this is "offtopic" for this patch.

Oleg.

--- a/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/kernel/signal.c
@@ -1437,7 +1437,8 @@ void lockdep_assert_task_sighand_held(struct task_struct *task)
 #endif
 
 /*
- * send signal info to all the members of a group
+ * send signal info to all the members of a thread group or to the
+ * individual thread if type == PIDTYPE_PID.
  */
 int group_send_sig_info(int sig, struct kernel_siginfo *info,
 			struct task_struct *p, enum pid_type type)