From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
To: "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 net-next 12/13] net: remove dev_base_lock from register_netdevice() and friends.
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2024 20:34:27 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240209203428.307351-13-edumazet@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240209203428.307351-1-edumazet@google.com>
RTNL already protects writes to dev->reg_state, we no longer need to hold
dev_base_lock to protect the readers.
unlist_netdevice() second argument can be removed.
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
---
net/core/dev.c | 20 +++++++-------------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 0c158dd534f80c46e66c890628be9a876e85068a..a1cb7d3cab2c521fc28bd5f522c147bffca8d15e 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ static void list_netdevice(struct net_device *dev)
/* Device list removal
* caller must respect a RCU grace period before freeing/reusing dev
*/
-static void unlist_netdevice(struct net_device *dev, bool lock)
+static void unlist_netdevice(struct net_device *dev)
{
struct netdev_name_node *name_node;
struct net *net = dev_net(dev);
@@ -425,13 +425,11 @@ static void unlist_netdevice(struct net_device *dev, bool lock)
netdev_name_node_del(name_node);
/* Unlink dev from the device chain */
- if (lock)
- write_lock(&dev_base_lock);
+ write_lock(&dev_base_lock);
list_del_rcu(&dev->dev_list);
netdev_name_node_del(dev->name_node);
hlist_del_rcu(&dev->index_hlist);
- if (lock)
- write_unlock(&dev_base_lock);
+ write_unlock(&dev_base_lock);
dev_base_seq_inc(dev_net(dev));
}
@@ -10296,9 +10294,9 @@ int register_netdevice(struct net_device *dev)
goto err_ifindex_release;
ret = netdev_register_kobject(dev);
- write_lock(&dev_base_lock);
+
WRITE_ONCE(dev->reg_state, ret ? NETREG_UNREGISTERED : NETREG_REGISTERED);
- write_unlock(&dev_base_lock);
+
if (ret)
goto err_uninit_notify;
@@ -10587,9 +10585,7 @@ void netdev_run_todo(void)
continue;
}
- write_lock(&dev_base_lock);
WRITE_ONCE(dev->reg_state, NETREG_UNREGISTERED);
- write_unlock(&dev_base_lock);
linkwatch_sync_dev(dev);
}
@@ -11096,10 +11092,8 @@ void unregister_netdevice_many_notify(struct list_head *head,
list_for_each_entry(dev, head, unreg_list) {
/* And unlink it from device chain. */
- write_lock(&dev_base_lock);
- unlist_netdevice(dev, false);
+ unlist_netdevice(dev);
WRITE_ONCE(dev->reg_state, NETREG_UNREGISTERING);
- write_unlock(&dev_base_lock);
}
flush_all_backlogs();
@@ -11281,7 +11275,7 @@ int __dev_change_net_namespace(struct net_device *dev, struct net *net,
dev_close(dev);
/* And unlink it from device chain */
- unlist_netdevice(dev, true);
+ unlist_netdevice(dev);
synchronize_net();
--
2.43.0.687.g38aa6559b0-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-09 20:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-09 20:34 [PATCH v3 net-next 00/13] net: complete dev_base_lock removal Eric Dumazet
2024-02-09 20:34 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 01/13] net: annotate data-races around dev->name_assign_type Eric Dumazet
2024-02-09 20:34 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 02/13] ip_tunnel: annotate data-races around t->parms.link Eric Dumazet
2024-02-09 20:34 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 03/13] dev: annotate accesses to dev->link Eric Dumazet
2024-02-09 20:34 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 04/13] net: convert dev->reg_state to u8 Eric Dumazet
2024-02-09 20:34 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 05/13] net-sysfs: convert netdev_show() to RCU Eric Dumazet
2024-02-09 20:34 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 06/13] net-sysfs: use dev_addr_sem to remove races in address_show() Eric Dumazet
2024-02-13 1:58 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-02-13 6:08 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-02-09 20:34 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 07/13] net-sysfs: convert dev->operstate reads to lockless ones Eric Dumazet
2024-02-09 20:34 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 08/13] net-sysfs: convert netstat_show() to RCU Eric Dumazet
2024-02-09 20:34 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 09/13] net: remove stale mentions of dev_base_lock in comments Eric Dumazet
2024-02-09 20:34 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 10/13] net: add netdev_set_operstate() helper Eric Dumazet
2024-02-09 20:34 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 11/13] net: remove dev_base_lock from do_setlink() Eric Dumazet
2024-02-09 20:34 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2024-02-09 20:34 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 13/13] net: remove dev_base_lock Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240209203428.307351-13-edumazet@google.com \
--to=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.