From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Tycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.pizza>,
linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] pidfd: change pidfd_send_signal() to respect PIDFD_THREAD
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2024 14:15:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240210131518.GC27557@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240210-dackel-getan-619c70fefa62@brauner>
On 02/10, Christian Brauner wrote:
>
> The question is what is more useful for userspace when they do:
> pidfd_send_signal(1234, PIDFD_SEND_PROCESS_GROUP)?
>
> (1) They either mean to signal a process group that is headed by 1234.
Yes, this is what I had in mind, see also another email from me.
Simple, clear, and matches kill(-1234).
> (2) Or they want to signal a process group of which 1234 is a member or
> the leader.
Somehow I didn't even consider this option when I thought about
PIDFD_SIGNAL_PGRP...
> From a usability perspective (1) is a lot more restrictive because it
> requires @pidfd to refer to a process group leader.
Yes, but to be honest (2) doesn't fit my head. Probably simply because
I always had (1) in mind...
But I won't argue if you think that (2) has useful usecases.
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-10 13:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-09 13:06 [PATCH v2 1/2] signal: add the "int si_code" arg to prepare_kill_siginfo() Oleg Nesterov
2024-02-09 13:06 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] pidfd: change pidfd_send_signal() to respect PIDFD_THREAD Oleg Nesterov
2024-02-09 15:11 ` Christian Brauner
2024-02-09 15:15 ` Christian Brauner
2024-02-09 15:43 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-02-09 15:49 ` Christian Brauner
2024-02-09 15:56 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-02-10 10:23 ` Christian Brauner
2024-02-10 12:30 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-02-10 12:47 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-02-10 12:54 ` Christian Brauner
2024-02-10 13:15 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2024-02-10 14:26 ` Christian Brauner
2024-02-10 16:51 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-02-10 17:22 ` Christian Brauner
2024-02-14 12:36 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-02-16 12:28 ` Christian Brauner
2024-02-16 13:06 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-02-16 14:46 ` Christian Brauner
2024-02-16 18:12 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-02-20 8:34 ` Christian Brauner
2024-02-20 9:02 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-02-20 9:22 ` Christian Brauner
2024-02-20 11:00 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-02-20 12:59 ` Christian Brauner
2024-02-20 16:22 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-02-21 7:42 ` Christian Brauner
2024-02-21 12:55 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-02-21 13:35 ` Christian Brauner
2024-02-09 19:08 ` Tycho Andersen
2024-02-09 15:10 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] signal: add the "int si_code" arg to prepare_kill_siginfo() Christian Brauner
2024-02-09 16:13 ` Christian Brauner
2024-02-09 16:22 ` Eric W. Biederman
2024-02-09 16:39 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-02-09 19:36 ` Christian Brauner
2024-02-09 19:53 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-02-09 20:01 ` Tycho Andersen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240210131518.GC27557@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=tycho@tycho.pizza \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.