Re: [PATCH v3 2/7] hw/pci: Determine if rombar is explicitly enabled

["Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>]

On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 07:20:30PM +0900, Akihiko Odaki wrote:
> vfio determines if rombar is explicitly enabled by inspecting QDict.
> Inspecting QDict is not nice because QDict is untyped and depends on the
> details on the external interface. Add an infrastructure to determine if
> rombar is explicitly enabled to hw/pci.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@daynix.com>
> ---
>  include/hw/pci/pci_device.h | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/hw/pci/pci_device.h b/include/hw/pci/pci_device.h
> index d3dd0f64b273..7564e9536dbd 100644
> --- a/include/hw/pci/pci_device.h
> +++ b/include/hw/pci/pci_device.h
> @@ -205,6 +205,11 @@ static inline uint16_t pci_get_bdf(PCIDevice *dev)
>      return PCI_BUILD_BDF(pci_bus_num(pci_get_bus(dev)), dev->devfn);
>  }
>  
> +static inline bool pci_rom_bar_explicitly_enabled(PCIDevice *dev)
> +{
> +    return dev->rom_bar > 0;
> +}
> +

I don't get it. rom_bar is uint32_t if it's set to "-1" is is still >0.

How was this patchset tested?


>  uint16_t pci_requester_id(PCIDevice *dev);
>  
>  /* DMA access functions */
> 
> -- 
> 2.43.0