Re: [meta-arago][kirkstone][PATCHv2 2/4] meta-arago: distro: add a bbappend to patch the chromium browser

[Denys Dmytriyenko <denis@denix.org>]

On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 01:17:25PM -0600, Randolph Sapp wrote:
> On 2/13/24 12:59, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
> >On Fri, Feb 09, 2024 at 12:56:33PM -0600, Etheridge, Darren via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote:
> >>From: Darren Etheridge <detheridge@ti.com>
> >>
> >>This applies a patch for meta-browser/chromium-ozone-wayland to make the
> >>sandboxing work with the Imagination GPU components without the need for
> >>the --no-sandbox flag.
> >>
> >>GPU acceleration in Chromium is dependant on IMG DDK 23.3.  It works
> >>across AXE/BXS/8XE GPU's.   No acceleration is expected for SGX.
> >>
> >>Also add an upstream patch to stop Chromium from segfaulting when it is
> >>run with no input devices connected to the board.
> >>Patch was retrieved from:
> >>https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/323077958301bc321d840a2c2b983ab469934753
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Darren Etheridge <detheridge@ti.com>
> >>---
> >>
> >>v2 Fixed typo on bbappend in subject
> >>
> >>  meta-arago-distro/conf/layer.conf             |  2 +
> >>  ...omium-ozone-wayland_111.0.5563.64.bbappend |  8 ++
> >>  ...dbox-allow-access-to-PowerVR-GPU-fro.patch | 74 +++++++++++++++++++
> >>  ...-chromium-32307795-fix-nullprt-deref.patch | 52 +++++++++++++
> >>  4 files changed, 136 insertions(+)
> [snip]
> >
> > Both chromium patches are missing Upstream-Status: tag - I guess
> first should
> > be "Inappropriate [TI RGX specific]" and the second "Backport" if
> it's already
> > merged upstream:
> > https://docs.yoctoproject.org/contributor-guide/recipe-style-guide.html#patch-upstream-status
> >
> 
> One for these patches is directly from upstream Chromium. Only one
> is RGX specific

And that's exactly what I said.


> but thanks for linking the naming reference so we
> can make this clear.