From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: axboe@kernel.dk
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] io_uring/net: fix sr->len for IORING_OP_RECV with MSG_WAITALL" failed to apply to 5.10-stable tree
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 14:16:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2024021340-playable-subsiding-a8db@gregkh> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 5.10-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.10.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x 72bd80252feeb3bef8724230ee15d9f7ab541c6e
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2024021340-playable-subsiding-a8db@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.10.y' HEAD^..
Possible dependencies:
72bd80252fee ("io_uring/net: fix sr->len for IORING_OP_RECV with MSG_WAITALL and buffers")
f9ead18c1058 ("io_uring: split network related opcodes into its own file")
e0da14def1ee ("io_uring: move statx handling to its own file")
a9c210cebe13 ("io_uring: move epoll handler to its own file")
4cf90495281b ("io_uring: add a dummy -EOPNOTSUPP prep handler")
99f15d8d6136 ("io_uring: move uring_cmd handling to its own file")
cd40cae29ef8 ("io_uring: split out open/close operations")
453b329be5ea ("io_uring: separate out file table handling code")
f4c163dd7d4b ("io_uring: split out fadvise/madvise operations")
0d5847274037 ("io_uring: split out fs related sync/fallocate functions")
531113bbd5bf ("io_uring: split out splice related operations")
11aeb71406dd ("io_uring: split out filesystem related operations")
e28683bdfc2f ("io_uring: move nop into its own file")
5e2a18d93fec ("io_uring: move xattr related opcodes to its own file")
97b388d70b53 ("io_uring: handle completions in the core")
de23077eda61 ("io_uring: set completion results upfront")
e27f928ee1cb ("io_uring: add io_uring_types.h")
4d4c9cff4f70 ("io_uring: define a request type cleanup handler")
890968dc0336 ("io_uring: unify struct io_symlink and io_hardlink")
9a3a11f977f9 ("io_uring: convert iouring_cmd to io_cmd_type")
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 72bd80252feeb3bef8724230ee15d9f7ab541c6e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2024 06:42:36 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] io_uring/net: fix sr->len for IORING_OP_RECV with MSG_WAITALL
and buffers
If we use IORING_OP_RECV with provided buffers and pass in '0' as the
length of the request, the length is retrieved from the selected buffer.
If MSG_WAITALL is also set and we get a short receive, then we may hit
the retry path which decrements sr->len and increments the buffer for
a retry. However, the length is still zero at this point, which means
that sr->len now becomes huge and import_ubuf() will cap it to
MAX_RW_COUNT and subsequently return -EFAULT for the range as a whole.
Fix this by always assigning sr->len once the buffer has been selected.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 7ba89d2af17a ("io_uring: ensure recv and recvmsg handle MSG_WAITALL correctly")
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
diff --git a/io_uring/net.c b/io_uring/net.c
index a12ff69e6843..43bc9a5f96f9 100644
--- a/io_uring/net.c
+++ b/io_uring/net.c
@@ -923,6 +923,7 @@ int io_recv(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
if (!buf)
return -ENOBUFS;
sr->buf = buf;
+ sr->len = len;
}
ret = import_ubuf(ITER_DEST, sr->buf, len, &msg.msg_iter);
reply other threads:[~2024-02-13 13:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2024021340-playable-subsiding-a8db@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.