All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>, Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>,
	James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
	John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] security: fix integer overflow in lsm_set_self_attr() syscall
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 16:45:42 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202402141644.808307E71@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a4a77e0e-8d5e-4c9d-aff4-9fe0d8b89cf0@schaufler-ca.com>

On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 08:53:52AM -0800, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> On 2/14/2024 8:05 AM, Jann Horn wrote:
> > security_setselfattr() has an integer overflow bug that leads to
> > out-of-bounds access when userspace provides bogus input:
> > `lctx->ctx_len + sizeof(*lctx)` is checked against `lctx->len` (and,
> > redundantly, also against `size`), but there are no checks on
> > `lctx->ctx_len`.
> > Therefore, userspace can provide an `lsm_ctx` with `->ctx_len` set to a
> > value between `-sizeof(struct lsm_ctx)` and -1, and this bogus `->ctx_len`
> > will then be passed to an LSM module as a buffer length, causing LSM
> > modules to perform out-of-bounds accesses.
> >
> > The following reproducer will demonstrate this under ASAN (if AppArmor is
> > loaded as an LSM):
> > ```
> > #define _GNU_SOURCE
> > #include <unistd.h>
> > #include <stdint.h>
> > #include <stdlib.h>
> > #include <sys/syscall.h>
> >
> > struct lsm_ctx {
> >   uint64_t id;
> >   uint64_t flags;
> >   uint64_t len;
> >   uint64_t ctx_len;

Do we want to take the opportunity to reduce this to u32 for len and u32
for ctx_len? All FS operations are limited to INT_MAX anyway...

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook

  reply	other threads:[~2024-02-15  0:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-14 16:05 [PATCH] security: fix integer overflow in lsm_set_self_attr() syscall Jann Horn
2024-02-14 16:53 ` Casey Schaufler
2024-02-15  0:45   ` Kees Cook [this message]
2024-02-15 13:02     ` Paul Moore
2024-02-14 18:53 ` Paul Moore
2024-02-14 23:24 ` Kees Cook

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202402141644.808307E71@keescook \
    --to=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=john.johansen@canonical.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=serge@hallyn.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.