From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, fw@strlen.de
Subject: [PATCH net 2/3] netfilter: nat: restore default DNAT behavior
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 00:38:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240214233818.7946-3-pablo@netfilter.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240214233818.7946-1-pablo@netfilter.org>
From: Kyle Swenson <kyle.swenson@est.tech>
When a DNAT rule is configured via iptables with different port ranges,
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp -d 10.0.0.2 -m tcp --dport 32000:32010
-j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.0.10:21000-21010
we seem to be DNATing to some random port on the LAN side. While this is
expected if --random is passed to the iptables command, it is not
expected without passing --random. The expected behavior (and the
observed behavior prior to the commit in the "Fixes" tag) is the traffic
will be DNAT'd to 192.168.0.10:21000 unless there is a tuple collision
with that destination. In that case, we expect the traffic to be
instead DNAT'd to 192.168.0.10:21001, so on so forth until the end of
the range.
This patch intends to restore the behavior observed prior to the "Fixes"
tag.
Fixes: 6ed5943f8735 ("netfilter: nat: remove l4 protocol port rovers")
Signed-off-by: Kyle Swenson <kyle.swenson@est.tech>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
---
net/netfilter/nf_nat_core.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_nat_core.c b/net/netfilter/nf_nat_core.c
index c3d7ecbc777c..016c816d91cb 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_nat_core.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_nat_core.c
@@ -551,8 +551,11 @@ static void nf_nat_l4proto_unique_tuple(struct nf_conntrack_tuple *tuple,
find_free_id:
if (range->flags & NF_NAT_RANGE_PROTO_OFFSET)
off = (ntohs(*keyptr) - ntohs(range->base_proto.all));
- else
+ else if ((range->flags & NF_NAT_RANGE_PROTO_RANDOM_ALL) ||
+ maniptype != NF_NAT_MANIP_DST)
off = get_random_u16();
+ else
+ off = 0;
attempts = range_size;
if (attempts > NF_NAT_MAX_ATTEMPTS)
--
2.30.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-14 23:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-14 23:38 [PATCH net 0/3] Netfilter fixes for net Pablo Neira Ayuso
2024-02-14 23:38 ` [PATCH net 1/3] netfilter: nft_set_pipapo: fix missing : in kdoc Pablo Neira Ayuso
2024-02-15 12:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2024-02-14 23:38 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2024-02-14 23:38 ` [PATCH net 3/3] netfilter: nf_tables: fix bidirectional offload regression Pablo Neira Ayuso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240214233818.7946-3-pablo@netfilter.org \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.