From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Alex Elder <elder@ieee.org>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <vireshk@kernel.org>,
Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>, Alex Elder <elder@kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Gustavo A . R . Silva" <gustavo@embeddedor.com>,
greybus-dev@lists.linaro.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] greybus: Avoid fake flexible array for response data
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2024 13:58:39 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202402171357.E671B5589@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <672fafca-547e-443e-8dd8-80ccd2320767@ieee.org>
On Sat, Feb 17, 2024 at 02:17:33PM -0600, Alex Elder wrote:
> On 2/16/24 5:28 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> > FORTIFY_SOURCE has been ignoring 0-sized destinations while the kernel
> > code base has been converted to flexible arrays. In order to enforce
> > the 0-sized destinations (e.g. with __counted_by), the remaining 0-sized
> > destinations need to be handled. Instead of converting an empty struct
> > into using a flexible array, just directly use a pointer without any
> > additional indirection. Remove struct gb_bootrom_get_firmware_response
> > and struct gb_fw_download_fetch_firmware_response.
>
> The only down side I see is that it sort of disrupts a pattern
> used on Greybus request handlers (and the response structure definitions).
>
> I think a one-line comment in place of each of these two
> definitions would be helpful, something like:
> /* gb_fw_download_fetch_firmware_response contains no data */
Er, maybe this should be "no other data" ? Do you want a v2 of this
patch?
> And then add a similar comment above the calls to
> gb_operation_response_alloc().
>
> Otherwise this looks good.
>
> Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Thanks!
--
Kees Cook
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-17 21:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-16 23:28 [PATCH] greybus: Avoid fake flexible array for response data Kees Cook
2024-02-17 20:17 ` Alex Elder
2024-02-17 21:58 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2024-02-18 16:48 ` Alex Elder
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-05-26 11:06 clingfei
2025-05-26 11:37 ` Dan Carpenter
2025-05-27 3:36 ` Kees Cook
2025-05-26 12:21 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202402171357.E671B5589@keescook \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=elder@ieee.org \
--cc=elder@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=greybus-dev@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=gustavo@embeddedor.com \
--cc=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vireshk@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.