From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDD947F464 for ; Sat, 17 Feb 2024 21:32:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.21 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708205571; cv=none; b=DlHAEOS8G0HUu9V+LihS81TDYM9pD+Bplql48FG0fVyrefndFM4US/mCq47J1iIku7lE2eOxfu947rI+IEbE/jgjuxcfuL1k36Y+b7Elh2dg+7tZPk0QIxMVEJ0rxk2lz8/eSFA2NPQJpTwe7QFV0JLj1DUlJIpavDzWo2qGe2Q= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708205571; c=relaxed/simple; bh=k94nrrWCR7y7H4czB8oQVSDh0e4Kx3+XvmtfflkT8PM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=BJ2LLkVZVj+N5bNBsP/3LJ3qMm5rheSp5tMQwLwG3knHUlW1Hf5Zg2nPm3+Lu0qCI0p9I+G3CRxk1/m7BUBW8Ofrwf8w+FlXGEY65iMaHDJNYIhK+OiU1vZWaJU44jNCdVHdErP74pGAryb1yyBRlra7oJT5mXyCB+1PardanEI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=U6O+gGjY; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.21 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="U6O+gGjY" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1708205569; x=1739741569; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=k94nrrWCR7y7H4czB8oQVSDh0e4Kx3+XvmtfflkT8PM=; b=U6O+gGjYJcAWtMJectQuQwICrUuK8d481+mwXizl+YaY4CYpiKB2Mhkp 38C5WVRwe1vzgdV54Xhi+/ls9vjTlO4TeTvr0A4NjHDJOD9LLeGcAoBZu VOA4/ynGymU6CLGra5kIdRKBIiXy8JWnm+yXAzMw3bJWyR1ZGF66ygFgT vyk8I/hhbezUbY+wv99Wy+jsaxnJOKHYpjJNSrAc8HG49ItRM0y9AirkS Isnd5fKEfMmWeiNV7pZf0o7aOeA4Gm9Z6eLvZeX3LQlBA7N2q7GSIrK5l FU3RK4BIzBLtbRcowdhlSMCsNdLPEEt1xaT+jarpQ8hatMGlzlBGUyLc5 Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10987"; a="2221193" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.06,167,1705392000"; d="scan'208";a="2221193" Received: from fmviesa003.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.143]) by orvoesa113.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Feb 2024 13:32:48 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.06,167,1705392000"; d="scan'208";a="8736132" Received: from lkp-server02.sh.intel.com (HELO 3c78fa4d504c) ([10.239.97.151]) by fmviesa003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 17 Feb 2024 13:32:47 -0800 Received: from kbuild by 3c78fa4d504c with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1rbSIe-0002W6-0U; Sat, 17 Feb 2024 21:32:44 +0000 Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2024 05:31:50 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Ben Cheatham Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 6/6] pcie/cxl_timeout: Add CXL.mem Timeout & Isolation interrupt support Message-ID: <202402180558.S6rTa5mq-lkp@intel.com> References: <20240215194048.141411-7-Benjamin.Cheatham@amd.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240215194048.141411-7-Benjamin.Cheatham@amd.com> Hi Ben, [This is a private test report for your RFC patch.] kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on pci/next] [also build test WARNING on pci/for-linus cxl/next cxl/pending linus/master v6.8-rc4 next-20240216] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Ben-Cheatham/cxl-core-Add-CXL-Timeout-Isolation-capability-parsing/20240216-034328 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pci/pci.git next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240215194048.141411-7-Benjamin.Cheatham%40amd.com patch subject: [RFC PATCH 6/6] pcie/cxl_timeout: Add CXL.mem Timeout & Isolation interrupt support config: alpha-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240218/202402180558.S6rTa5mq-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: alpha-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240218/202402180558.S6rTa5mq-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202402180558.S6rTa5mq-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> drivers/pci/pcie/cxl_timeout.c:231:13: warning: no previous prototype for 'cxl_timeout_thread' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 231 | irqreturn_t cxl_timeout_thread(int irq, void *data) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ vim +/cxl_timeout_thread +231 drivers/pci/pcie/cxl_timeout.c 230 > 231 irqreturn_t cxl_timeout_thread(int irq, void *data) 232 { 233 struct cxl_timeout_wq_data *wq_data; 234 struct cxl_timeout *cxlt = data; 235 struct pcie_device *pcie_dev = cxlt->dev; 236 struct pcie_cxlt_data *pdata; 237 struct cxl_dport *dport; 238 u32 status; 239 240 /* 241 * If the CXL core didn't register a cxl_dport with this PCIe device, 242 * then dport enumeration failed and there's nothing to do CXL-wise. 243 */ 244 pdata = get_service_data(pcie_dev); 245 if (!pdata || !pdata->dport) 246 return IRQ_HANDLED; 247 248 dport = pdata->dport; 249 250 status = readl(cxlt->regs + CXL_TIMEOUT_STATUS_OFFSET); 251 if (!(status & CXL_TIMEOUT_STATUS_MEM_ISO 252 || status & CXL_TIMEOUT_STATUS_MEM_TIMEOUT)) 253 return IRQ_HANDLED; 254 255 dport->isolated = true; 256 257 wq_data = kzalloc(sizeof(struct cxl_timeout_wq_data), GFP_NOWAIT); 258 if (!wq_data) 259 return IRQ_NONE; 260 261 wq_data->dport = dport; 262 263 INIT_WORK(&wq_data->w, cxl_timeout_handler); 264 queue_work(cxl_timeout_wq, &wq_data->w); 265 266 return IRQ_HANDLED; 267 } 268 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki