All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Chandan Babu R <chandan.babu@oracle.com>,
	"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] xfs: split xfs_mod_freecounter
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 17:08:58 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240220160858.GA18908@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240220072821.GA10025@lst.de>

On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 08:28:21AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> So we should be fine here, but the code could really use documentation,
> a few more asserts and a slightly different structure that makes this
> more obvious.  I'll throw in a patch for that.

This is what I ended up with:

---
From 22cba925f1f94b22cfa6143a814f1d14a3521621 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 08:35:27 +0100
Subject: xfs: block deltas in xfs_trans_unreserve_and_mod_sb must be positive

And to make that more clear, rearrange the code a bit and add asserts
and a comment.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
 fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c
index 12d45e93f07d50..befb508638ca1f 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c
@@ -594,28 +594,38 @@ xfs_trans_unreserve_and_mod_sb(
 {
 	struct xfs_mount	*mp = tp->t_mountp;
 	bool			rsvd = (tp->t_flags & XFS_TRANS_RESERVE) != 0;
-	int64_t			blkdelta = 0;
-	int64_t			rtxdelta = 0;
+	int64_t			blkdelta = tp->t_blk_res;
+	int64_t			rtxdelta = tp->t_rtx_res;
 	int64_t			idelta = 0;
 	int64_t			ifreedelta = 0;
 	int			error;
 
-	/* calculate deltas */
-	if (tp->t_blk_res > 0)
-		blkdelta = tp->t_blk_res;
-	if ((tp->t_fdblocks_delta != 0) &&
-	    (xfs_has_lazysbcount(mp) ||
-	     (tp->t_flags & XFS_TRANS_SB_DIRTY)))
+	/*
+	 * Calculate the deltas.
+	 *
+	 * t_fdblocks_delta and t_frextents_delta can be positive or negative:
+	 *
+	 *  - positive values indicate blocks freed in the transaction.
+	 *  - negative values indicate blocks allocated in the transaction
+	 *
+	 * Negative values can only happen if the transaction has a block
+	 * reservation that covers the allocated block.  The end result is
+	 * that the calculated delta values must always be positive and we
+	 * can only put back previous allocated or reserved blocks here.
+	 */
+	ASSERT(tp->t_blk_res || tp->t_fdblocks_delta >= 0);
+	if (xfs_has_lazysbcount(mp) || (tp->t_flags & XFS_TRANS_SB_DIRTY)) {
 	        blkdelta += tp->t_fdblocks_delta;
+		ASSERT(blkdelta >= 0);
+	}
 
-	if (tp->t_rtx_res > 0)
-		rtxdelta = tp->t_rtx_res;
-	if ((tp->t_frextents_delta != 0) &&
-	    (tp->t_flags & XFS_TRANS_SB_DIRTY))
+	ASSERT(tp->t_rtx_res || tp->t_frextents_delta >= 0);
+	if (tp->t_flags & XFS_TRANS_SB_DIRTY) {
 		rtxdelta += tp->t_frextents_delta;
+		ASSERT(rtxdelta >= 0);
+	}
 
-	if (xfs_has_lazysbcount(mp) ||
-	     (tp->t_flags & XFS_TRANS_SB_DIRTY)) {
+	if (xfs_has_lazysbcount(mp) || (tp->t_flags & XFS_TRANS_SB_DIRTY)) {
 		idelta = tp->t_icount_delta;
 		ifreedelta = tp->t_ifree_delta;
 	}
-- 
2.39.2


  reply	other threads:[~2024-02-20 16:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-19  6:34 bring back RT delalloc support Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-19  6:34 ` [PATCH 1/9] xfs: make XFS_TRANS_LOWMODE match the other XFS_TRANS_ definitions Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-19  6:34 ` [PATCH 2/9] xfs: move RT inode locking out of __xfs_bunmapi Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-19 23:55   ` Dave Chinner
2024-02-20  5:10     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-19  6:34 ` [PATCH 3/9] xfs: split xfs_mod_freecounter Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-19 23:21   ` Dave Chinner
2024-02-20  7:28     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-20 16:08       ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2024-02-21  0:00         ` Dave Chinner
2024-02-19  6:34 ` [PATCH 4/9] xfs: reinstate RT support in xfs_bmapi_reserve_delalloc Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-19  6:34 ` [PATCH 5/9] xfs: cleanup fdblock/frextent accounting in xfs_bmap_del_extent_delay Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-19  6:34 ` [PATCH 6/9] xfs: support RT inodes in xfs_mod_delalloc Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-19 23:30   ` Dave Chinner
2024-02-20  5:14     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-19  6:34 ` [PATCH 7/9] xfs: look at m_frextents in xfs_iomap_prealloc_size for RT allocations Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-19  6:34 ` [PATCH 8/9] xfs: stop the steal (of data blocks for RT indirect blocks) Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-19 23:47   ` Dave Chinner
2024-02-20  5:13     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-02-19  6:34 ` [PATCH 9/9] xfs: reinstate delalloc for RT inodes (if sb_rextsize == 1) Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240220160858.GA18908@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=chandan.babu@oracle.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.