From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>,
Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@microchip.com>,
Arun Ramadoss <arun.ramadoss@microchip.com>,
kernel@pengutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/1] net: dsa: microchip: Add support for bridge port isolation
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 17:53:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240221175357.GE722610@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240221093429.802077-1-o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 10:34:29AM +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> Implement bridge port isolation for KSZ switches. Enabling the isolation
> of switch ports from each other while maintaining connectivity with the
> CPU and other forwarding ports. For instance, to isolate swp1 and swp2
> from each other, use the following commands:
> - bridge link set dev swp1 isolated on
> - bridge link set dev swp2 isolated on
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
> Acked-by: Arun Ramadoss <arun.ramadoss@microchip.com>
> ---
> changes v2:
> - add comments and new lines
>
> drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_common.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++---
> drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_common.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_common.c b/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_common.c
> index 7cd37133ec05..efe54c9492e8 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_common.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_common.c
> @@ -1898,6 +1898,29 @@ static void ksz_get_strings(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
> }
> }
>
> +/**
> + * ksz_adjust_port_member - Adjust port forwarding rules based on STP state and
> + * isolation settings.
> + * @dev: A pointer to the struct ksz_device representing the device.
> + * @port: The port number to adjust.
> +
> + * This function dynamically adjusts the port membership configuration for a
> + * specified port and other device ports, based on Spanning Tree Protocol (STP)
> + * states and port isolation settings. Each port, including the CPU port, has a
> + * membership register, represented as a bitfield, where each bit corresponds
> + * to a port number. A set bit indicates permission to forward frames to that
> + * port. This function iterates over all ports, updating the membership register
> + * to reflect current forwarding permissions:
> + *
> + * 1. Forwards frames only to ports that are part of the same bridge group and
> + * in the BR_STATE_FORWARDING state.
> + * 2. Takes into account the isolation status of ports; ports in the
> + * BR_STATE_FORWARDING state with BR_ISOLATED configuration will not forward
> + * frames to each other, even if they are in the same bridge group.
> + * 3. Ensures that the CPU port is included in the membership based on its
> + * upstream port configuration, allowing for management and control traffic
> + * to flow as required.
> + */
> static void ksz_update_port_member(struct ksz_device *dev, int port)
...
Hi Oleksij,
I haven't looked over this patch closely.
But it does seem to have some Kernel doc problems.
.../ksz_common.c:1905: warning: bad line:
.../ksz_common.c:1924: warning: expecting prototype for ksz_adjust_port_member(). Prototype was for ksz_update_port_member() instead
You can observe these by running ./scripts/kernel-doc -none
I'm going to flag this as Changes Requested in patchwork
as typically this kind of problem gets flagged by bots sooner or later.
pw-bot: changes-requested
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-21 17:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-21 9:34 [PATCH net-next v2 1/1] net: dsa: microchip: Add support for bridge port isolation Oleksij Rempel
2024-02-21 17:53 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2024-02-22 7:33 ` Oleksij Rempel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240221175357.GE722610@kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=arun.ramadoss@microchip.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=woojung.huh@microchip.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.