From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org,shuah@kernel.org,usama.anjum@collabora.com,akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: [merged mm-stable] selftests-mm-mlock-random-test-conform-test-to-tap-format-output.patch removed from -mm tree
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 16:02:35 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240222000235.97D9DC433C7@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
The quilt patch titled
Subject: selftests/mm: mlock-random-test: conform test to TAP format output
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
selftests-mm-mlock-random-test-conform-test-to-tap-format-output.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into the mm-stable branch
of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
------------------------------------------------------
From: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@collabora.com>
Subject: selftests/mm: mlock-random-test: conform test to TAP format output
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2024 16:31:11 +0500
Conform the layout, informational and status messages to TAP. No
functional change is intended other than the layout of output messages.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240202113119.2047740-5-usama.anjum@collabora.com
Signed-off-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@collabora.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
tools/testing/selftests/mm/mlock-random-test.c | 136 +++++----------
1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 82 deletions(-)
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/mlock-random-test.c~selftests-mm-mlock-random-test-conform-test-to-tap-format-output
+++ a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/mlock-random-test.c
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
#include <sys/ipc.h>
#include <sys/shm.h>
#include <time.h>
+#include "../kselftest.h"
#include "mlock2.h"
#define CHUNK_UNIT (128 * 1024)
@@ -31,14 +32,14 @@ int set_cap_limits(rlim_t max)
new.rlim_cur = max;
new.rlim_max = max;
if (setrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, &new)) {
- perror("setrlimit() returns error\n");
+ ksft_perror("setrlimit() returns error\n");
return -1;
}
/* drop capabilities including CAP_IPC_LOCK */
if (cap_set_proc(cap)) {
- perror("cap_set_proc() returns error\n");
- return -2;
+ ksft_perror("cap_set_proc() returns error\n");
+ return -1;
}
return 0;
@@ -52,27 +53,24 @@ int get_proc_locked_vm_size(void)
unsigned long lock_size = 0;
f = fopen("/proc/self/status", "r");
- if (!f) {
- perror("fopen");
- return -1;
- }
+ if (!f)
+ ksft_exit_fail_msg("fopen: %s\n", strerror(errno));
while (fgets(line, 1024, f)) {
if (strstr(line, "VmLck")) {
ret = sscanf(line, "VmLck:\t%8lu kB", &lock_size);
if (ret <= 0) {
- printf("sscanf() on VmLck error: %s: %d\n",
- line, ret);
fclose(f);
- return -1;
+ ksft_exit_fail_msg("sscanf() on VmLck error: %s: %d\n",
+ line, ret);
}
fclose(f);
return (int)(lock_size << 10);
}
}
- perror("cannot parse VmLck in /proc/self/status\n");
fclose(f);
+ ksft_exit_fail_msg("cannot parse VmLck in /proc/self/status: %s\n", strerror(errno));
return -1;
}
@@ -91,10 +89,8 @@ int get_proc_page_size(unsigned long add
size_t size;
smaps = seek_to_smaps_entry(addr);
- if (!smaps) {
- printf("Unable to parse /proc/self/smaps\n");
- return 0;
- }
+ if (!smaps)
+ ksft_exit_fail_msg("Unable to parse /proc/self/smaps\n");
while (getline(&line, &size, smaps) > 0) {
if (!strstr(line, "MMUPageSize")) {
@@ -105,12 +101,9 @@ int get_proc_page_size(unsigned long add
}
/* found the MMUPageSize of this section */
- if (sscanf(line, "MMUPageSize: %8lu kB",
- &mmupage_size) < 1) {
- printf("Unable to parse smaps entry for Size:%s\n",
- line);
- break;
- }
+ if (sscanf(line, "MMUPageSize: %8lu kB", &mmupage_size) < 1)
+ ksft_exit_fail_msg("Unable to parse smaps entry for Size:%s\n",
+ line);
}
free(line);
@@ -136,7 +129,7 @@ int get_proc_page_size(unsigned long add
* return value: 0 - success
* else: failure
*/
-int test_mlock_within_limit(char *p, int alloc_size)
+static void test_mlock_within_limit(char *p, int alloc_size)
{
int i;
int ret = 0;
@@ -145,11 +138,9 @@ int test_mlock_within_limit(char *p, int
int page_size = 0;
getrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, &cur);
- if (cur.rlim_cur < alloc_size) {
- printf("alloc_size[%d] < %u rlimit,lead to mlock failure\n",
- alloc_size, (unsigned int)cur.rlim_cur);
- return -1;
- }
+ if (cur.rlim_cur < alloc_size)
+ ksft_exit_fail_msg("alloc_size[%d] < %u rlimit,lead to mlock failure\n",
+ alloc_size, (unsigned int)cur.rlim_cur);
srand(time(NULL));
for (i = 0; i < TEST_LOOP; i++) {
@@ -169,13 +160,11 @@ int test_mlock_within_limit(char *p, int
ret = mlock2_(p + start_offset, lock_size,
MLOCK_ONFAULT);
- if (ret) {
- printf("%s() failure at |%p(%d)| mlock:|%p(%d)|\n",
- is_mlock ? "mlock" : "mlock2",
- p, alloc_size,
- p + start_offset, lock_size);
- return ret;
- }
+ if (ret)
+ ksft_exit_fail_msg("%s() failure at |%p(%d)| mlock:|%p(%d)|\n",
+ is_mlock ? "mlock" : "mlock2",
+ p, alloc_size,
+ p + start_offset, lock_size);
}
/*
@@ -183,18 +172,12 @@ int test_mlock_within_limit(char *p, int
*/
locked_vm_size = get_proc_locked_vm_size();
page_size = get_proc_page_size((unsigned long)p);
- if (page_size == 0) {
- printf("cannot get proc MMUPageSize\n");
- return -1;
- }
- if (locked_vm_size > PAGE_ALIGN(alloc_size, page_size) + page_size) {
- printf("test_mlock_within_limit() left VmLck:%d on %d chunk\n",
- locked_vm_size, alloc_size);
- return -1;
- }
+ if (locked_vm_size > PAGE_ALIGN(alloc_size, page_size) + page_size)
+ ksft_exit_fail_msg("%s left VmLck:%d on %d chunk\n",
+ __func__, locked_vm_size, alloc_size);
- return 0;
+ ksft_test_result_pass("%s\n", __func__);
}
@@ -213,7 +196,7 @@ int test_mlock_within_limit(char *p, int
* return value: 0 - success
* else: failure
*/
-int test_mlock_outof_limit(char *p, int alloc_size)
+static void test_mlock_outof_limit(char *p, int alloc_size)
{
int i;
int ret = 0;
@@ -221,11 +204,9 @@ int test_mlock_outof_limit(char *p, int
struct rlimit cur;
getrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, &cur);
- if (cur.rlim_cur >= alloc_size) {
- printf("alloc_size[%d] >%u rlimit, violates test condition\n",
- alloc_size, (unsigned int)cur.rlim_cur);
- return -1;
- }
+ if (cur.rlim_cur >= alloc_size)
+ ksft_exit_fail_msg("alloc_size[%d] >%u rlimit, violates test condition\n",
+ alloc_size, (unsigned int)cur.rlim_cur);
old_locked_vm_size = get_proc_locked_vm_size();
srand(time(NULL));
@@ -240,56 +221,47 @@ int test_mlock_outof_limit(char *p, int
else
ret = mlock2_(p + start_offset, lock_size,
MLOCK_ONFAULT);
- if (ret == 0) {
- printf("%s() succeeds? on %p(%d) mlock%p(%d)\n",
- is_mlock ? "mlock" : "mlock2",
- p, alloc_size,
- p + start_offset, lock_size);
- return -1;
- }
+ if (ret == 0)
+ ksft_exit_fail_msg("%s() succeeds? on %p(%d) mlock%p(%d)\n",
+ is_mlock ? "mlock" : "mlock2",
+ p, alloc_size, p + start_offset, lock_size);
}
locked_vm_size = get_proc_locked_vm_size();
- if (locked_vm_size != old_locked_vm_size) {
- printf("tests leads to new mlocked page: old[%d], new[%d]\n",
- old_locked_vm_size,
- locked_vm_size);
- return -1;
- }
+ if (locked_vm_size != old_locked_vm_size)
+ ksft_exit_fail_msg("tests leads to new mlocked page: old[%d], new[%d]\n",
+ old_locked_vm_size,
+ locked_vm_size);
- return 0;
+ ksft_test_result_pass("%s\n", __func__);
}
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
char *p = NULL;
- int ret = 0;
+
+ ksft_print_header();
if (set_cap_limits(MLOCK_RLIMIT_SIZE))
- return -1;
+ ksft_finished();
+
+ ksft_set_plan(2);
p = malloc(MLOCK_WITHIN_LIMIT_SIZE);
- if (p == NULL) {
- perror("malloc() failure\n");
- return -1;
- }
- ret = test_mlock_within_limit(p, MLOCK_WITHIN_LIMIT_SIZE);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
+ if (p == NULL)
+ ksft_exit_fail_msg("malloc() failure: %s\n", strerror(errno));
+
+ test_mlock_within_limit(p, MLOCK_WITHIN_LIMIT_SIZE);
munlock(p, MLOCK_WITHIN_LIMIT_SIZE);
free(p);
-
p = malloc(MLOCK_OUTOF_LIMIT_SIZE);
- if (p == NULL) {
- perror("malloc() failure\n");
- return -1;
- }
- ret = test_mlock_outof_limit(p, MLOCK_OUTOF_LIMIT_SIZE);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
+ if (p == NULL)
+ ksft_exit_fail_msg("malloc() failure: %s\n", strerror(errno));
+
+ test_mlock_outof_limit(p, MLOCK_OUTOF_LIMIT_SIZE);
munlock(p, MLOCK_OUTOF_LIMIT_SIZE);
free(p);
- return 0;
+ ksft_finished();
}
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from usama.anjum@collabora.com are
selftests-mm-hugetlb_reparenting_test-do-not-unmount.patch
selftests-mm-run_vmtests-remove-sudo-and-conform-to-tap.patch
selftests-mm-run_vmtests-remove-sudo-and-conform-to-tap-fix.patch
selftests-mm-save-and-restore-nr_hugepages-value.patch
selftests-mm-protection_keys-save-restore-nr_hugepages-settings.patch
selftests-mm-run_vmtestssh-add-missing-tests.patch
selftests-mm-run_vmtestssh-add-missing-tests-fix.patch
reply other threads:[~2024-02-22 0:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240222000235.97D9DC433C7@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=usama.anjum@collabora.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.