[merged mm-stable] mm-memory-ignore-writable-bit-in-folio_pte_batch.patch removed from -mm tree

[Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>]

The quilt patch titled
     Subject: mm/memory: ignore writable bit in folio_pte_batch()
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     mm-memory-ignore-writable-bit-in-folio_pte_batch.patch

This patch was dropped because it was merged into the mm-stable branch
of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm

------------------------------------------------------
From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Subject: mm/memory: ignore writable bit in folio_pte_batch()
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 13:46:49 +0100

...  and conditionally return to the caller if any PTE except the first
one is writable.  fork() has to make sure to properly write-protect in
case any PTE is writable.  Other users (e.g., page unmaping) are expected
to not care.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240129124649.189745-16-david@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Cc: Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@rivosinc.com>
Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>
Cc: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>
Cc: Russell King (Oracle) <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 mm/memory.c |   30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

--- a/mm/memory.c~mm-memory-ignore-writable-bit-in-folio_pte_batch
+++ a/mm/memory.c
@@ -968,7 +968,7 @@ static inline pte_t __pte_batch_clear_ig
 		pte = pte_mkclean(pte);
 	if (likely(flags & FPB_IGNORE_SOFT_DIRTY))
 		pte = pte_clear_soft_dirty(pte);
-	return pte_mkold(pte);
+	return pte_wrprotect(pte_mkold(pte));
 }
 
 /*
@@ -976,21 +976,32 @@ static inline pte_t __pte_batch_clear_ig
  * pages of the same folio.
  *
  * All PTEs inside a PTE batch have the same PTE bits set, excluding the PFN,
- * the accessed bit, dirty bit (with FPB_IGNORE_DIRTY) and soft-dirty bit
- * (with FPB_IGNORE_SOFT_DIRTY).
+ * the accessed bit, writable bit, dirty bit (with FPB_IGNORE_DIRTY) and
+ * soft-dirty bit (with FPB_IGNORE_SOFT_DIRTY).
+ *
+ * If "any_writable" is set, it will indicate if any other PTE besides the
+ * first (given) PTE is writable.
  */
 static inline int folio_pte_batch(struct folio *folio, unsigned long addr,
-		pte_t *start_ptep, pte_t pte, int max_nr, fpb_t flags)
+		pte_t *start_ptep, pte_t pte, int max_nr, fpb_t flags,
+		bool *any_writable)
 {
 	unsigned long folio_end_pfn = folio_pfn(folio) + folio_nr_pages(folio);
 	const pte_t *end_ptep = start_ptep + max_nr;
 	pte_t expected_pte = __pte_batch_clear_ignored(pte_next_pfn(pte), flags);
 	pte_t *ptep = start_ptep + 1;
+	bool writable;
+
+	if (any_writable)
+		*any_writable = false;
 
 	VM_WARN_ON_FOLIO(!pte_present(pte), folio);
 
 	while (ptep != end_ptep) {
-		pte = __pte_batch_clear_ignored(ptep_get(ptep), flags);
+		pte = ptep_get(ptep);
+		if (any_writable)
+			writable = !!pte_write(pte);
+		pte = __pte_batch_clear_ignored(pte, flags);
 
 		if (!pte_same(pte, expected_pte))
 			break;
@@ -1003,6 +1014,9 @@ static inline int folio_pte_batch(struct
 		if (pte_pfn(pte) == folio_end_pfn)
 			break;
 
+		if (any_writable)
+			*any_writable |= writable;
+
 		expected_pte = pte_next_pfn(expected_pte);
 		ptep++;
 	}
@@ -1024,6 +1038,7 @@ copy_present_ptes(struct vm_area_struct
 {
 	struct page *page;
 	struct folio *folio;
+	bool any_writable;
 	fpb_t flags = 0;
 	int err, nr;
 
@@ -1044,7 +1059,8 @@ copy_present_ptes(struct vm_area_struct
 		if (!vma_soft_dirty_enabled(src_vma))
 			flags |= FPB_IGNORE_SOFT_DIRTY;
 
-		nr = folio_pte_batch(folio, addr, src_pte, pte, max_nr, flags);
+		nr = folio_pte_batch(folio, addr, src_pte, pte, max_nr, flags,
+				     &any_writable);
 		folio_ref_add(folio, nr);
 		if (folio_test_anon(folio)) {
 			if (unlikely(folio_try_dup_anon_rmap_ptes(folio, page,
@@ -1058,6 +1074,8 @@ copy_present_ptes(struct vm_area_struct
 			folio_dup_file_rmap_ptes(folio, page, nr);
 			rss[mm_counter_file(folio)] += nr;
 		}
+		if (any_writable)
+			pte = pte_mkwrite(pte, src_vma);
 		__copy_present_ptes(dst_vma, src_vma, dst_pte, src_pte, pte,
 				    addr, nr);
 		return nr;
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from david@redhat.com are

mm-memory-factor-out-zapping-of-present-pte-into-zap_present_pte.patch
mm-memory-handle-page-case-in-zap_present_pte-separately.patch
mm-memory-further-separate-anon-and-pagecache-folio-handling-in-zap_present_pte.patch
mm-memory-factor-out-zapping-folio-pte-into-zap_present_folio_pte.patch
mm-mmu_gather-pass-delay_rmap-instead-of-encoded-page-to-__tlb_remove_page_size.patch
mm-mmu_gather-define-encoded_page_flag_delay_rmap.patch
mm-mmu_gather-add-tlb_remove_tlb_entries.patch
mm-mmu_gather-add-__tlb_remove_folio_pages.patch
mm-mmu_gather-improve-cond_resched-handling-with-large-folios-and-expensive-page-freeing.patch
mm-memory-optimize-unmap-zap-with-pte-mapped-thp.patch