[merged mm-stable] mm-hugetlb-improve-the-handling-of-hugetlb-allocation-failure-for-freed-or-in-use-hugetlb.patch removed from -mm tree

[Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>]

The quilt patch titled
     Subject: mm: hugetlb: improve the handling of hugetlb allocation failure for freed or in-use hugetlb
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     mm-hugetlb-improve-the-handling-of-hugetlb-allocation-failure-for-freed-or-in-use-hugetlb.patch

This patch was dropped because it was merged into the mm-stable branch
of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm

------------------------------------------------------
From: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Subject: mm: hugetlb: improve the handling of hugetlb allocation failure for freed or in-use hugetlb
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2024 11:08:11 +0800

alloc_and_dissolve_hugetlb_folio() preallocates a new hugetlb page before
it takes hugetlb_lock.  In 3 out of 4 cases the page is not really used
and therefore the newly allocated page is just freed right away.  This is
wasteful and it might cause pre-mature failures in those cases.

Address that by moving the allocation down to the only case (hugetlb page
is really in the free pages pool).  We need to drop hugetlb_lock to do so
and therefore need to recheck the page state after regaining it.

The patch is more of a cleanup than an actual fix to an existing problem. 
There are no known reports about pre-mature failures.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/62890fd60b1ecd5bf1cdc476c973f60fe37aa0cb.1707181934.git.baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com
Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 mm/hugetlb.c |   32 ++++++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

--- a/mm/hugetlb.c~mm-hugetlb-improve-the-handling-of-hugetlb-allocation-failure-for-freed-or-in-use-hugetlb
+++ a/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -3029,21 +3029,9 @@ static int alloc_and_dissolve_hugetlb_fo
 {
 	gfp_t gfp_mask = htlb_alloc_mask(h) | __GFP_THISNODE;
 	int nid = folio_nid(old_folio);
-	struct folio *new_folio;
+	struct folio *new_folio = NULL;
 	int ret = 0;
 
-	/*
-	 * Before dissolving the folio, we need to allocate a new one for the
-	 * pool to remain stable.  Here, we allocate the folio and 'prep' it
-	 * by doing everything but actually updating counters and adding to
-	 * the pool.  This simplifies and let us do most of the processing
-	 * under the lock.
-	 */
-	new_folio = alloc_buddy_hugetlb_folio(h, gfp_mask, nid, NULL, NULL);
-	if (!new_folio)
-		return -ENOMEM;
-	__prep_new_hugetlb_folio(h, new_folio);
-
 retry:
 	spin_lock_irq(&hugetlb_lock);
 	if (!folio_test_hugetlb(old_folio)) {
@@ -3073,6 +3061,16 @@ retry:
 		cond_resched();
 		goto retry;
 	} else {
+		if (!new_folio) {
+			spin_unlock_irq(&hugetlb_lock);
+			new_folio = alloc_buddy_hugetlb_folio(h, gfp_mask, nid,
+							      NULL, NULL);
+			if (!new_folio)
+				return -ENOMEM;
+			__prep_new_hugetlb_folio(h, new_folio);
+			goto retry;
+		}
+
 		/*
 		 * Ok, old_folio is still a genuine free hugepage. Remove it from
 		 * the freelist and decrease the counters. These will be
@@ -3100,9 +3098,11 @@ retry:
 
 free_new:
 	spin_unlock_irq(&hugetlb_lock);
-	/* Folio has a zero ref count, but needs a ref to be freed */
-	folio_ref_unfreeze(new_folio, 1);
-	update_and_free_hugetlb_folio(h, new_folio, false);
+	if (new_folio) {
+		/* Folio has a zero ref count, but needs a ref to be freed */
+		folio_ref_unfreeze(new_folio, 1);
+		update_and_free_hugetlb_folio(h, new_folio, false);
+	}
 
 	return ret;
 }
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com are

mm-compaction-limit-the-suitable-target-page-order-to-be-less-than-cc-order.patch